Literature DB >> 35918339

Chromosome-level assembly of Gymnocypris eckloni genome.

Fayan Wang1, Lihan Wang1, Dan Liu1, Qiang Gao1, Miaomiao Nie1, Shihai Zhu2, Yan Chao3, Chaojie Yang1, Cunfang Zhang1, Rigui Yi1, Weilin Ni1, Fei Tian4, Kai Zhao4, Delin Qi5.   

Abstract

Gymnocypris eckloni is widely distributed in isolated lakes and the upper reaches of the Yellow River and play significant roles in the trophic web of freshwater communities. In this study, we generated a chromosome-level genome of G. eckloni using PacBio, Illumina and Hi-C sequencing data. The genome consists of 23 pseudo-chromosomes that contain 918.68 Mb of sequence, with a scaffold N50 length of 43.54 Mb. In total, 23,157 genes were annotated, representing 94.80% of the total predicted protein-coding genes. The phylogenetic analysis showed that G. eckloni was most closely related to C. carpio with an estimated divergence time of ~34.8 million years ago. For G. eckloni, we identified a high-quality genome at the chromosome level. This genome will serve as a valuable genomic resource for future research on the evolution and ecology of the schizothoracine fish in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35918339      PMCID: PMC9346132          DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01595-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   8.501


Background & Summary

The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) is the highest and one of the biggest plateaus on earth, covering 2.5 × 106 square kilometers with an elevation of 3000–5000 m for most parts of the area. The intensive uplifts of QTP resulted from collision of the India plate and the Eurasia plate had a profound impact on the climate and environment[1,2]. Characterized by high altitude, low oxygen partial pressure (hypoxia), low temperatures, dramatic temperature fluctuations, and high UV radiation, the QTP environment posed harsh challenges to the endemic animals[3,4]. Recently, comparative genomic studies of animals endemic to the QTP provide valuable clues for scientists to understand the molecular mechanism of environmental adaptation[4-8]. However, the genome information of fish species in QTP is still lacking. Schizothoracine fish (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) are the largest and most diverse taxon within the QTP ichthyofauna and their radiation has been correlated with the plateau’s rapid upheaval[9,10]. The schizothoracine fish, confined to regions at either high altitudes or high latitudes, have evolved a number of unique traits (i.e., degeneration of body scales, slow growth, and late sexual maturity) that adapt to the extreme environment of the QTP and play significant roles in the trophic web of QTP freshwater communities[10-13]. Therefore, the schizothoracine fish have been accepted as ideal models for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptation to harsh environments[11-13]. The schizothoracine fish comprises 11 or 12 genera and approximately 100 species and are mainly distributed in cold tributaries and lakes of the QTP and adjacent areas at 2000 m above sea level[10,11]. The phylogenetic analysis based on morphological traits revealed that the schizothoracine fishes can be divided into three sub-groups including primitive, specialized and highly specialized group[10], which was proposed to be associated with the tectonic upshifts of the QTP[14-16]. Previous studies have shown that the karyotypes of the schizothoracine fish range from 90 to 446 and that almost all species were polyploid[17-20]. A recent genomic study confirmed that Schizothorax o’connori of Schizothoracinae was a young tetraploid that underwent a fourth whole-genome duplication (4 R WGD) after the teleost-specific third WGD (3 R WGD)[21]. Other studies indicated that the globin gene superfamily, toll-like receptor family, and interferon regulatory factors in a representative species from this subfamily underwent adaptive evolution in response to the plateau environment, specifically gene loss, and gain events as a result of genome and/or gene duplications[13,22-24]. Gymnocypris eckloni is a representative species of the highly specialized schizothoracine fish that is widely distributed in isolated lakes and the upper reaches of the Yellow River, and is very well adapted to the plateau’s aqueous environment[9,10]. Investigating the genomic evolution of G. eckloni may shed light on the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in high-altitude adaptations in schizothoracine fish of the QTP. In the present study, we integrated PacBio long-read sequencing, Illumina short-read sequencing, and high-throughput chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) technology to generate a high-quality chromosome-level reference genome for G. eckloni. The reference genome obtained in this study will provide a foundation for future investigations on the evolution and adaptation of schizothoracine fish.

Methods

Experimental fish and sequencing

G. eckloni genomic DNA were extracted from the muscle samples of a healthy female individuals obtained from the Native Fish Artificial Proliferation and Release Station, Xunhua, Qinghai Province, China (Fig. s1). For genome assembly, two libraries with insert sizes of 300 bp and 20 kb were separately constructed using an Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA Library Prep Kit and SMRT bell Template Prep Kit. The two libraries were subsequently sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq X Ten instrument and a PacBio Sequel platform[25]. For the PacBio platform, a total of 312.2 Gb PacBio long sequencing reads were generated, and 239.0 Gb subreads (334.6 × coverage) with an average length of 23,706 bp were obtained after removing adaptors in polymerase reads (Table 1). For the Illumina HiSeq X Ten sequencing platform, a total of 251.7 Gb short sequencing reads were generated. After filtering, 215.2 Gb (231.2 × coverage) of clean Illumina data were retained to perform a genome survey.
Table 1

Sequencing data used for the genome G. eckloni assembly.

Library typesInsert size (bp)Raw data (Gb)Clean data (Gb)Read length (bp)Sequence coverage (X)
Illumina reads300215.7215.2150231.2
PacBio reads20000312.2239.023706334.6
Hi-C reads257.3257.3300275.8
RNA reads30067.7666.43150
Total852.96777.93
Sequencing data used for the genome G. eckloni assembly. To conduct chromosome-level assembly of the G. eckloni genome, a Hi-C library was generated using the Mbo I restriction enzyme following previously described standard protocol with minor modifications[26]. In brief, the purified DNA from the fresh muscle sample was digested with Mbo I restriction enzyme and labelled by incubating with Biotin-14-dATP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and then ligated by T4 DNA Ligase. After incubating overnight to reverse crosslinks, the ligated DNA was sheared into 200–600 bp fragments, and then blunt-end repaired and A-tailed, followed by purification through biotin-streptavidin-mediated pull down. Finally, the Hi-C libraries were quantified and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform (Illumina, USA) using a PE-150 module, generating a total of 257.3 Gb (275.8 × coverage) clean data after using the same filter criteria with short reads (Table 1). To provide evidence of transcripts for genome structure annotation, we conducted RNA-seq for muscle, skin, gill, liver, gut, spleen, kidney, heart, eye and blood samples. RNA was extracted using Ambion MagMAX-96 total RNA isolation kit (Life Sciences, United States) for all samples, and DNase I treatment was performed to eliminate DNA contamination. After the quality assessment of the extracted RNAs using NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (Implen, United States), RNA-seq libraries were constructed according to the protoco and were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq4000 in paired-end 150 bp mode, resulting in a total of 66.43 Gb clean transcriptome data (Table 1).

De novo assembly of G. eckloni genome

We used the k-mer method to survey the genomic features of the G. eckloni. The k-mer count histogram was obtained from Illumina paired-end sequencing data using Jellyfish v2.99[27]. Based on the total number of 169,021,371,761 17-mers and a peak 17-mer depth of 181, the genome size of G. eckloni was estimated to be 927.13 Mb, and the estimated heterozygosity rate was approximately 1.82% (Table s1). The 239.0 Gb subreads from the PacBio Sequel platform were used for genome assembly using wtdbg2[28] followed by Quiver[29] and Pilon[30] polishing using the 215.2 Gb of Illumina HiSeq clean reads, which produced a 918.45 Mb genome assembly, consisting of 3,170 contigs with a contig N50 size of 4.19 Mb (Table 2).
Table 2

The statistics of length and number for the de novo assembled G. eckloni genome.

TermLengthNo.
Contig (bp)Scaffold (bp)ContigScaffold
Total918,450,624918,681,4883,170711
Max22,682,26089,391,071
Number >  = 20003,058711
N504,192,82443,543,958568
N602,476,20434,715,9278511
N701,500,51332,896,10813313
N80641,41629,129,54622916
N90146,68525,669,04555320
The statistics of length and number for the de novo assembled G. eckloni genome. Hi-C technology was applied to conduct the chromosome-level genome assembly of G. eckloni. Clean reads sequenced from the Hi-C library were aligned to the contig-level genome with an end-to-end algorithm implemented in Bowtie v2.3.5 according to the Hi-C-Pro strategy[31,32]. Juicer v1.6.2 and 3D de novo assembly (3D-DNA) pipelines were used to assemble the contigs into the chromosome-level genome[33,34]. Ultimately, the assembled sequences were further anchored and orientated onto 23 pseudo-chromosomes using Hi-C data. The 23 pseudo-chromosomes ranged in size from 15.91 to 89.39 Mb (Fig. 1 and Table s2), covering ~98.52% of the whole genome. Finally, the G. eckloni genome was obtained with 711 scaffolds and a total length of 918,681,488 bp, a contig N50 of 4.19 Mb, and scaffold N50 of 43.54 Mb (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Characteristics of the G. eckloni genome. (a) Hi-C intra-chromosomal contact map of the G. eckloni genome assembly. (b) Circos plot of the G. eckloni genome assembly. 1) Pseudo-chromosomes; 2) gene distribution; 3) GC content; 4) repeat distribution; 5) rRNA distribution; 6) tRNA distribution; 7) miRNA distribution; 8) snRNA distribution. All data were obtained using a sliding window of 10 Kb.

Characteristics of the G. eckloni genome. (a) Hi-C intra-chromosomal contact map of the G. eckloni genome assembly. (b) Circos plot of the G. eckloni genome assembly. 1) Pseudo-chromosomes; 2) gene distribution; 3) GC content; 4) repeat distribution; 5) rRNA distribution; 6) tRNA distribution; 7) miRNA distribution; 8) snRNA distribution. All data were obtained using a sliding window of 10 Kb. The completeness of the genome assembly was assessed by the single copy orthologs (BUSCO, version 5.3.2)[35] and CEGMA[36] software. The BUSCO analysis based on the actinopterygii_odb10 database showed that 87.5% (single-copy genes: 83.0%, duplicated genes: 4.5%) of the 3,640 single-copy genes were identified as complete, 1.3% were fragmented, and 11.2% were missing from the assembled genome. The CEGMA analysis revealed that 221 conserved genes (89.11% of the core eukaryotic genes) supported the completeness of the assembled genome. Illumina short reads were mapped to the assembled genome using BWA[37] software to evaluate completeness of the genome assembly. The results showed that 93.40% of the reads could be mapped, covering 96.34% of the assembled genome.

Repetitive element and non-coding gene annotation in the G. eckloni genome

A combined strategy using homology alignments and de novo searches to identify whole-genome repeats was applied in our repeat annotation pipeline. Tandem repeats were extracted using TRF (http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html) by ab initio prediction. For homolog prediction, Repbase (http://www.girinst.org /repbase) employing RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) software and its in-house scripts (RepeatProteinMask) with default parameters was used to extract repeat regions. Additionally, ab initio prediction based on the de novo repetitive elements database was conducted by LTR_FINDER (http://tlife.fudan.edu.cn/ltr_finder/), RepeatScout (http://www.repeatmasker.org/), and RepeatModeler (http://www.repeatmasker.org/RepeatModeler.html) with default parameters. Then, all repeat sequences with lengths > 100 bp and gap ‘N’ < 5% were used to construct the raw transposable element (TE) library. A custom library (a combination of Repbase and our de novo TE library, which was processed by uclust to yield a non-redundant library) was supplied to RepeatMasker for DNA-level repeat identification. The results showed revealed that 47.63% of the G. eckloni genome was annotated as repetitive elements (Table s3), of which LTRs were the most abundant with a total length of 356.79 Mb, accounting for 38.84% of the whole genome. SINEs were the rarest with a total length of 2.37 Mb and represented 0.26% of the whole genome (Table s4). The tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan-SE (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/), and the rRNA sequences were predicted using BLAST. The results showed that a total of 12,157 tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan-SE, and 1,780 rRNA genes were annotated using BLASTN tool with an E-value of 1E-1032 against human rRNA sequence. Other ncRNAs, including miRNAs and snRNAs, were identified by searching against the Rfam database with default parameters using infernal software (http://infernal.janelia.org/) (Table s5).

Annotation of protein-coding genes

Gene predictions were conducted through a combination of homology, de novo, and transcriptome-based prediction methods. For homology-based predictions, the protein sequences of seven fish species, including Oryzias latipes, Ctenopharyngodon idellus, Ictalurus punctatus, Cyprinus carpio, Takifugu rubripes, Danio rerio, and Astyanax mexicanus, were downloaded from Ensembl database (http://asia.ensembl.org/index. html). Protein sequences were aligned to the genome using TblastN v2.2.26 with an e-value of 1e−5 [38]. Then, matching proteins were aligned to homologous genome sequences for accurate spliced alignments using GeneWise v2.4.1[39] (referred to “Homolog” in Table 3), which was subsequently used to predict gene structure of each protein region. RNA-sequencing data derived from nine tissues and blood samples were assembled using Trinity v2.1.1[40], and were aligned against the G. eckloni genome using Program to Assemble Spliced Alignment (PASA)[41] (referred to “PASA” in Table 3). To optimize genome annotation, RNA-seq reads from different tissues were aligned to G. eckloni genome fasta using TopHat package v2.0.11 with default parameters to identify exons region and splice positions[42]. The alignment results were then used as inputs for Cufflinks package v2.2.1 with default parameters for genome-based transcript assembly[43] (referred to “Cufflinks”in Table 3). Finally, EvidenceModeler v1.1.1 was used to combine the gene models into weighted consensus gene structures with masked repetitive elements[41]. Additionally, PASA was used to update the final gene models, thereby adding information of alternatively spliced sites and untranslated regions (UTR) (referred to “Pasa-update” in Table 3). Ultimately, a total of 24,430 protein-coding genes were predicted in the G. eckloni genome. The average transcript length was 16,219.34 bp with an average coding sequence (CDS) length of 1,536.71 bp. The average exon number per gene was 8.88 with an average exon length of 173.00 bp and average intron length of 1,862.69 bp (Table 3). The statistics of gene models, including lengths of a gene, CDS, intron, and exon in G. eckloni were comparable to those for close-related species (Table s6 and Fig. 2).
Table 3

Gene annotation of G. eckloni genome via three methods.

MethodGene setNumberAverage length (bp)Exons No. per gene
TranscriptCDSExonIntron
De novoAugustus38,4319,427.681,102.72181.261,637.576.08
GlimmerHMM88,3729,368.19580.21146.672,973.053.96
SNAP47,47820,534.02796.89143.554,336.445.55
Geneid32,71617,045.391,223.45216.313,398.155.66
Genscan32,71219,569.141,429.87189.782,775.947.53
HomologOryzias latipes18,84511,159.321,293.66179.221,586.587.22
Ctenopharyngodon idellus24,6029,475.911,264.07184.131,400.126.87
Ictalurus punctatus19,53513,585.621,522.10182.891,647.478.32
Cyprinus carpio23,77610,240.811,276.54182.361,494.047.00
Takifugu rubripes18,02813,503.981,497.61181.741,658.258.24
Danio rerio20,92913,270.631,510.71180.451,595.288.37
Astyanax mexicanus20,09011,862.971,393.39185.721,610.037.50
RNAseqPASA91,22014,128.661,240.08165.121,979.727.51
Transcripts66,83731,133.652,702.91300.163,551.639.00
  EVM35,93111,908.941,192.33176.571,862.876.75
  Pasa-update35,59912,447.201,220.20177.471,910.776.88
  Final set24,43016,219.341,536.71173.001,862.698.88

Note that CDS refers to coding sequence; GlimmerHMM was a new genefinder based on a Generalized Hidden Markov Model (GHMM); SNAP refers to Semi-HMM-based Nucleic Acid Parser; EVM refers to Evidence modeler.

Fig. 2

The composition of gene elements in the G. eckloni genome to other species. (a) CDS length distribution and comparison with other species. (b) Exon length distribution and comparison with other species. (c) Exon number distribution and comparison with other species. (d) Gene length distribution and comparison with other species. (e) Intron length distribution and comparison with other species.

Gene annotation of G. eckloni genome via three methods. Note that CDS refers to coding sequence; GlimmerHMM was a new genefinder based on a Generalized Hidden Markov Model (GHMM); SNAP refers to Semi-HMM-based Nucleic Acid Parser; EVM refers to Evidence modeler. The composition of gene elements in the G. eckloni genome to other species. (a) CDS length distribution and comparison with other species. (b) Exon length distribution and comparison with other species. (c) Exon number distribution and comparison with other species. (d) Gene length distribution and comparison with other species. (e) Intron length distribution and comparison with other species. Public biological function databases of NR, SwissProt[44], InterPro[45], and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases[46] were used for the functional annotation of protein-coding genes using BLASTX and BLASTN utilities[46] with an e-value threshold of 1e−5. InterPro database was used to predict protein function based on the conserved protein domains by InterproScan tool[47]. A total of 23,157 genes (94.8%) were successfully annotated by at least one public database (Table s7 and Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Venn diagram of number of genes with homology or functional classification by each method.

Venn diagram of number of genes with homology or functional classification by each method.

Evolutionary and comparative genomic analysis

To examine G. eckloni evolution, we used OthoMCL[48] to cluster its genes with those from 13 other vertebrates: Astyanax mexicanus, Ictalurus punctatus, Danio rerio, C. carpio, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Oreochromis niloticus, Oryzias latipes, Takifugu rubripes, Gallus gallus, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Xenopus tropicalis, and Petromyzon marinus. From these 14 species, we identified 597 one-to-one single-copy genes that were used to construct a maximum likelihood (ML) tree using RaxML with the GTRGAMMA model[49]. Divergence times between species were calculated using the MCMC tree program implemented by PAML package[50]. According to the time-calibrated phylogeny, the age of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the teleost fish was estimated to be 211.8–254.1 million years ago. The G. eckloni with the closest relationship to C. carpio shared an MRCA at ~ 34.8 million years ago (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree based on single-copy genes from 14 species shows the estimated divergence time (blue numbers), topology and expansion (green numbers), and contraction (red numbers) of gene families.

Phylogenetic tree based on single-copy genes from 14 species shows the estimated divergence time (blue numbers), topology and expansion (green numbers), and contraction (red numbers) of gene families. A total of 24,619 gene families were identified among the 14 species (Table s8), of which 2,739 core gene families were shared by all 14 species and 856 gene families is unique for G. eckloni including 1,488 genes. Analysis of the expansion and contraction of the gene families revealed that there were 464 (1650 genes) expanded and 743 (192 genes) contracted gene families in G. eckloni when compared to its MRCA (Fig. 4). The expanded gene families included ABC transporters, Peroxisome, Herpes simplex virus 1 infection, Staphylococcus aureus infection, Axon guidance, Dorso-ventral axis formation, Pertussis, Legionellosis, Rap1 signaling pathway and so on, and the contracted gene families included Tight junction, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection, Gap junction, Alcoholism, Pertussis, Ascorbate and aldarate metabolism, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and so on.

Data Records

All raw data of the whole genome have been deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA database (Experiments for SRP377513) under BioProject accession number PRJNA835611[51]. The assembled genome has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAMHKY000000000[52]. Data of the expansion and contraction of the gene families, gene functional annotations, repeat annotation and results of evolutionary analysis had been deposited at Figshare[53].

Technical Validation

RNA integrity

The transcriptomes for nine tissues and blood from three fish individuals were sequenced. Before constructing RNA-Seq libraries, RNA purity was analyzed with a NanoPhotometer Spectrophotometer (Implen, United States). The RNA concentration was quantified with a Qubit RNA Assay Kit in a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, United States). RNA integrity was analyzed using a RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, United States). The total amount of RNA, RNA integrity and rRNA ratio were used to estimate the quality, content and degradation level of RNA samples. In the present study, RNAs samples with a total RNA amount ≥ 10 μg, RNA integrity number ≥ 8, and rRNA ratio ≥ 1.5 were finally subjected to construct the sequencing library.

Comparative genomic analyses

The protein sequences of 13 vertebrates, including A. mexicanus, I. punctatus, D. rerio, C. carpio, C. idella, O. niloticus, O. latipes, T. rubripes, G. gallus, H. sapiens, M. musculus, X. tropicalis, and P. marinus, were downloaded from the Ensembl database (Release 98). Orthologous relationships between the genes from G. eckloni and the 13 other vertebrates were inferred through all-against-all protein sequence similarity searches using OthoMCL[48]. Only the longest predicted transcript per locus was retained. In the all-against-all BLASTP comparisons, a cutoff e-value of 1e−5 was used. The MCL inflation index was set to 1.5. For each gene family, an alignment was produced using Muscle (http://www.drive5.com/muscle/), and ambiguously aligned positions were trimmed using Gblocks (http://molevol.cmima.csic.es/castresana/Gblocks.html). The tree was inferred using RAxML[49]. The best-scoring ML tree was inferred by a rapid bootstrap algorithm and ML searches after performing 1000 rapid bootstrap replications. Divergence times between species were calculated using the MCMC tree program implemented by PAML package[50]. The divergence times for D. rerio vs C. idella (48–75 Ma), A. mexicanus vs C. carpio (137–174 Ma), C. carpio vs T. rubripes (206–252 Ma), G. gallus vs X. tropicalis (347.6–358.3 Ma), T. rubripes vs G. gallus (413–443 Ma), and G. gallus vs P. marinus (515–646 Ma) were obtained from the TimeTree database then used to calibrate divergence dates of other nodes on the phylogenetic tree[54]. According to the divergence times and phylogenetic relationships, CAFÉ was used to analyze the expansion and constriction of gene families in the G. eckloni genome based on the gene families identified by OrthoMCL[55]. The phylogenetic tree topology and branch lengths were taken into account when inferring the significance of change in the gene family size of each branch. Enrichment analyses based on the Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG annotations were performed to identify the functional implications of expanded and contracted genes (Fisher’s exact test, adjusted p-value < 0.05). Supplementary information of Chromosome-level assembly of Gymnocypris eckloni genome
Measurement(s)Genome
Technology Type(s)Whole Genome Sequencing
Sample Characteristic - OrganismGymnocypris eckloni
Sample Characteristic - Environmentfresh water
Sample Characteristic - LocationLittle Yellow River
  43 in total

1.  GeneWise and Genomewise.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; Michele Clamp; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Suleski; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; David H Alexander; Patrick Marks; Aaron A Klammer; James Drake; Cheryl Heiner; Alicia Clum; Alex Copeland; John Huddleston; Evan E Eichler; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Adaptive evolution of interferon regulatory factors is not correlated with body scale reduction or loss in schizothoracine fish.

Authors:  Delin Qi; Yan Chao; Jian Liang; Qiang Gao; Rongrong Wu; Ian Mather; Yongli Zhao; Qichang Chen
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.581

7.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Teresa K Attwood; Patricia C Babbitt; Alex Bateman; Peer Bork; Alan J Bridge; Hsin-Yu Chang; Zsuzsanna Dosztányi; Sara El-Gebali; Matthew Fraser; Julian Gough; David Haft; Gemma L Holliday; Hongzhan Huang; Xiaosong Huang; Ivica Letunic; Rodrigo Lopez; Shennan Lu; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Huaiyu Mi; Jaina Mistry; Darren A Natale; Marco Necci; Gift Nuka; Christine A Orengo; Youngmi Park; Sebastien Pesseat; Damiano Piovesan; Simon C Potter; Neil D Rawlings; Nicole Redaschi; Lorna Richardson; Catherine Rivoire; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Christian Sigrist; Ian Sillitoe; Ben Smithers; Silvano Squizzato; Granger Sutton; Narmada Thanki; Paul D Thomas; Silvio C E Tosatto; Cathy H Wu; Ioannis Xenarios; Lai-Su Yeh; Siew-Yit Young; Alex L Mitchell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing.

Authors:  Nicolas Servant; Nelle Varoquaux; Bryan R Lajoie; Eric Viara; Chong-Jian Chen; Jean-Philippe Vert; Edith Heard; Job Dekker; Emmanuel Barillot
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Transcriptome Analysis Provides Insights Into the Adaptive Responses to Hypoxia of a Schizothoracine Fish (Gymnocypris eckloni).

Authors:  Delin Qi; Yan Chao; Rongrong Wu; Mingzhe Xia; Qichang Chen; Zhiqin Zheng
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.