Literature DB >> 35916924

Safety of office-based flexible endoscopic procedures of the pharynx and larynx under topical anesthesia.

Virginie Woisard1,2,3, Marine Alexis4, Sabine Crestani4, Yohan Gallois5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Flexible endoscopic procedures (FEP) using a working channel allowed otolaryngologists to perform more procedures on the pharynx and the larynx under local anesthesia. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of this technique by studying the adverse effects of this practice in an office-based setting.
METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective cohort study. We searched the database using the French procedural code for FEP performed in an outpatient setting between January 2005 and December 2020. Data regarding the patient's characteristics, indications, and periprocedural complications were extracted.
RESULTS: In total, we included 231 patients with a total of 308 FEP: 36% biopsy, 20% hyaluronic acid injection (including 3.5% at the level of the cavum), 20% injection of other substances (in descending order: botulinum toxin, cidofovir, physiological serum, cortisone), 20% exploration for an occult tumor, 3% samples for microbiological analysis, 1% other procedures. Of the 308 FEP included in this study, 24 patients (10.3%) had complications corresponding to 7.8% of the procedures performed. During the procedures, reported complications include minor laryngeal bleeding (n = 5), vasovagal syncope (n = 5), laryngospasm (n = 1) or nausea (n = 3), dysphagia (n = 3), and voice disorders (n = 3). Post-procedural complications were hypertensive crisis (n = 1), asthma attack (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1), laryngitis (n = 1). Using the Clavien-Dindo classification system, these complications could be defined as grade I (laryngeal bleeding, vasovagal syncope, laryngospasm, dysphagia, nausea, voice disorders, and laryngitis) and grade II (hypertensive crisis, asthma attack, pneumonia) in 9.1% and 1.2% of cases, respectively. Most of these complications were self-limiting, while asthma attacks, pneumonia, laryngitis, and voice disorders required a medical intervention. All complications were managed without sequelae. There was no serious complication grade (no grade III, IV or V).
CONCLUSIONS: FEP, which is now well standardized in our institution, makes it possible to carry out a wide range of interventions with little morbidity. These results are in line with those of literature but this technique remains out of nomenclature in France. Our experience led to the development of an evidence-based standard of care that can serve as a framework for practitioners on a nationwide level, while the work to establish official guidelines by the French society of phoniatrics and laryngology is in progress.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexible endoscopic procedures; Laryngeal disorders; Local anesthesia; Office based procedures; Velopharyngeal deficit

Year:  2022        PMID: 35916924     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07525-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   3.236


  13 in total

1.  In-office biopsy of upper airway lesions: safety, tolerance, and effect on time to treatment.

Authors:  Dylan Lippert; Matthew R Hoffman; Phat Dang; Timothy M McCulloch; Gregory K Hartig; Seth H Dailey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The utility of office-based biopsy for laryngopharyngeal lesions: comparison with surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Amanda L Richards; Manikandan Sugumaran; Jonathan E Aviv; Peak Woo; Kenneth W Altman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Complications and Failures of Office-Based Endoscopic Angiolytic Laser Surgery Treatment.

Authors:  Anthony G Del Signore; Rupali N Shah; Nikita Gupta; Kenneth W Altman; Peak Woo
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors.

Authors:  Harini Naidu; J Pieter Noordzij; Arang Samim; Scharukh Jalisi; Gregory A Grillone
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Safety and length of benefit of restylane for office-based injection medialization-a retrospective review of one institution's experience.

Authors:  Ashleigh A Halderman; Paul C Bryson; Michael S Benninger; Rebecca Chota
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Comparison of trans-nasal laryngoscopic office based biopsy of laryngopharyngeal lesions with traditional operative biopsy.

Authors:  Craig H Zalvan; Darnell J Brown; Stanley J Oiseth; Rick M Roark
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Office-Based Lower Airway Endoscopy: Feasibility and Safety.

Authors:  Eulalia Amador; William S Tierney; Brandon Hopkins
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Safety of flexible endoscopic biopsy of the pharynx and larynx under topical anesthesia.

Authors:  David J Wellenstein; Joey K de Witt; Henrieke W Schutte; Jimmie Honings; Frank J A van den Hoogen; Henri A M Marres; Robert P Takes; Guido B van den Broek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Transoral flexible laryngoscope biopsy: Safety and accuracy.

Authors:  Nabeel Humayun Hassan; Rahila Usman; Muhammad Yousuf; Ahmad Nawaz Ahmad; Ismail Hirani
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-17

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.