| Literature DB >> 35915802 |
Huijuan Zhang1, Jun Yang2, Ying Xiong3.
Abstract
To explore the effect of nutritional support program on gastrointestinal function, complication rate, and prognosis in elderly patients with cerebral infarction (CI), 200 elderly patients with CI from January 2020 to January 2021 are investigated in this study. The patients were randomly divided into a study set and a control group, with 100 cases in each set. All sets were given routine treatment, the control set was given parenteral nutrition support on a routine basis, and the study set was given enteral nutrition support on a routine basis. First, the clinical efficacy of the two sets after treatment was compared. Next, the constipation symptom score was adopted to compare the intestinal function of the two sets of patients before and after one month of treatment. The nutritional indicators, including serum albumin (ALB) and serum total protein (TP) levels, were compared between the two sets of patients before and after one month of treatment. Furthermore, the complications of the two sets of patients and the prognosis of the two groups of patients are analyzed. For elderly CI patients, enteral nutrition support therapy can significantly improve the clinical treatment effect, the gastrointestinal function, and nutritional index level. Also, it can reduce the incidence of complications and enhance the prognosis, survival rate, and quality of life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35915802 PMCID: PMC9338853 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3198272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Contrast of clinical efficacy between the two sets of sufferers.
| Set | Get well | Efficient | Progress | Invalid | Total efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast set ( | 23 (23.00) | 26 (26.00) | 24 (24.00) | 27 (27.00) | 73 (73.00) |
| Study set ( | 59 (59.00) | 21 (21.00) | 15 (15.00) | 5 (5.00) | 95 (95.00) |
|
| 16.893 | ||||
|
| <0.001 |
Contrast of intestinal function changes between the two sets at different time points.
| Set | Constipation symptom score (points) | |
|---|---|---|
| Before therapy | 1 month after therapy | |
| Contrast set ( | 11.01 ± 2.96 | 8.21 ± 1.63∗ |
| Study set ( | 10.85 ± 2.89 | 5.19 ± 1.06∗ |
|
| 0.951 | 14.563 |
|
| 0.218 | <0.001 |
Contrast of changes in nutritional indicators between the two sets at different time points.
| Set | ALB (g/l) | TP (g/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before therapy | 1 month after therapy | Before therapy | 1 month after therapy | |
| Contrast set ( | 26.49 ± 1.53 | 31.41 ± 4.51∗ | 60.96 ± 4.29 | 64.12 ± 4.33∗ |
| Study set ( | 26.75 ± 1.45 | 36.15 ± 5.27∗ | 61.53 ± 4.17 | 70.17 ± 4.53∗ |
|
| 0.631 | 11.851 | 0.775 | 10.571 |
|
| 0.501 | <0.001 | 0.453 | <0.001 |
Contrast of complications between the two sets.
| Set | Lung infection | Electrolyte imbalance | Gastrointestinal bleeding | Total incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast set ( | 8 (8.00) | 7 (7.00) | 9 (9.00) | 24 (24.00) |
| Study set ( | 2 (2.00) | 2 (2.00) | 2 (2.00) | 6 (6.00) |
|
| 15.417 | |||
|
| <0.001 |
Figure 1Contrast of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two sets.
Figure 2Contrast of survival in the two sets within one year.
Contrast of the quality of life between the two sets at different time points.
| Project | Set | Before therapy | 1 year after therapy |
|---|---|---|---|
| PF | Study set ( | 52.56 ± 4.25 | 85.56 ± 5.26∗& |
| Contrast set ( | 53.66 ± 4.19 | 65.33 ± 5.17∗ | |
| RP | Study set ( | 62.23 ± 4.79 | 89.42 ± 3.38∗& |
| Contrast set ( | 62.81 ± 4.91 | 70.10 ± 3.35∗ | |
| BP | Study set ( | 76.56 ± 3.15 | 83.34 ± 4.57∗ |
| Contrast set ( | 76.35 ± 3.56 | 80.55 ± 4.79∗ | |
| GH | Study set ( | 75.31 ± 5.12 | 86.69 ± 3.03∗& |
| Contrast set ( | 75.81 ± 5.62 | 82.10 ± 3.34∗ | |
| VT | Study set ( | 55.75 ± 5.31 | 63.17 ± 3.36∗ |
| Contrast set ( | 56.24 ± 5.34 | 60.67 ± 3.17∗ | |
| SF | Study set ( | 55.99 ± 3.16 | 66.15 ± 3.04∗& |
| Contrast set ( | 55.60 ± 3.32 | 61.65 ± 3.13∗ | |
| RE | Study set ( | 74.74 ± 5.18 | 82.75 ± 3.51∗ |
| Contrast set ( | 75.10 ± 5.57 | 80.22 ± 2.06∗ | |
| MH | Study set ( | 68.12 ± 5.68 | 73.19 ± 3.49∗ |
| Contrast set ( | 67.17 ± 5.70 | 71.75 ± 3.66∗ |