| Literature DB >> 35915676 |
Sewar H Abuarqob1, Brooke E Kania1, Ariana R Tagliaferri1, Sherif Roman1, Rajapriya Manickam2.
Abstract
Skin and soft-tissue infections are common in critically ill patients, especially with gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus or Staphylococcus species. However, it is imperative to consider gram-negative infections in atypical presentations of bullous cellulitis, where patients do not initially respond to common empiric therapy for skin infections. Serratia marcescens is a gram-negative organism that manifests in nosocomial settings due to its affinity for moisture-rich environments. This bacteria is often difficult to treat due to extensive antibiotic resistance, and thus treatment is generally catered towards culture sensitivity. Rarely, this bacteria is an infective agent of infective endocarditis. We present a case of a 44-year-old gentleman who presented with stroke-like symptoms and was found to have bullous cellulitis with deep wound cultures growing S. marcescens. This case report highlights an atypical, severe presentation, and aims to provide a literature review of this rare manifestation of S. marcescens in skin and soft-tissue infections. We intend to improve rapid diagnosis and proper treatment for future critically-ill patients with skin and soft-tissue infections.Entities:
Keywords: bullous cellulitis; gram-negative bacteria; sepsis; serratia marcescens; skin and soft tissue infections
Year: 2022 PMID: 35915676 PMCID: PMC9337789 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Photographs of the patient’s bilateral lower extremities demonstrating skin changes due to cellulitis. Significant hyperpigmentation and venous stasis changes of the bilateral lower extremities from ankles to knees with pitting edema bilaterally, and without evidence of crepitus were noted.
Figure 2CT of the chest showing nodular infiltrates in both lung fields, suggestive of septic emboli.
Figure 3CT of the head without contrast (axial view) was negative for intracranial hemorrhage. There was no evidence of an acute cortical infarct, mass effect, midline shift or, hydrocephalus.