| Literature DB >> 35915088 |
Bingdong Sui1, Jin Liu2,3, Chenxi Zheng1, Lei Dang2, Ji Chen1, Yuan Cao1, Kaichao Zhang1,4, Lu Liu1, Minyan Dang1,4, Liqiang Zhang1,4, Nan Chen1, Tao He1, Kun Xuan1, Fang Jin1, Ge Zhang2, Yan Jin5,6, Chenghu Hu7,8,9,10.
Abstract
Sympathetic cues via the adrenergic signaling critically regulate bone homeostasis and contribute to neurostress-induced bone loss, but the mechanisms and therapeutics remain incompletely elucidated. Here, we reveal an osteoclastogenesis-centered functionally important osteopenic pathogenesis under sympatho-adrenergic activation with characterized microRNA response and efficient therapeutics. We discovered that osteoclastic miR-21 was tightly regulated by sympatho-adrenergic cues downstream the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) signaling, critically modulated osteoclastogenesis in vivo by inhibiting programmed cell death 4 (Pdcd4), and mediated detrimental effects of both isoproterenol (ISO) and chronic variable stress (CVS) on bone. Intriguingly, without affecting osteoblastic bone formation, bone protection against ISO and CVS was sufficiently achieved by a (D-Asp8)-lipid nanoparticle-mediated targeted inhibition of osteoclastic miR-21 or by clinically relevant drugs to suppress osteoclastogenesis. Collectively, these results unravel a previously underdetermined molecular and functional paradigm that osteoclastogenesis crucially contributes to sympatho-adrenergic regulation of bone and establish multiple targeted therapeutic strategies to counteract osteopenias under stresses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35915088 PMCID: PMC9343357 DOI: 10.1038/s41368-022-00193-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oral Sci ISSN: 1674-2818 Impact factor: 24.897
Fig. 1Sympatho-adrenergic regulation of bone involves osteoclastic miR-21 response. a, b Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. c, d Calcein labeling of mineralized femoral surface and quantification of bone formation rates. Bars: 50 μm. e, f Toluidine blue staining showing osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 12.5 μm. g, h TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. i, j ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. k MiR-21 expression levels in isolated osteoclasts (Oc). n = 6 per group (a–j) and n = 3 per group (k). WT or β2AR knock-out mice received the ISO challenge or PBS injection. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant
Fig. 2Selective suppression of osteoclastic miR-21 retards osteoclastogenesis and ameliorates osteopenia provoked by ISO. a MiR-21 expression levels in isolated osteoclasts (Oc) and osteoblasts (Ob). b, c Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. d, e TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. f, g Calcein labeling of mineralized femoral surface and quantification of bone formation rates. Bars: 50 μm. h, i Toluidine blue staining showing osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 12.5 μm. j ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. n = 3 per group (a) and N = 5 per group (b–j). Osteoclast-targeted delivery of antagomir-21 (Oc-antagomir-21) or its negative control (Oc-NC) was performed under the ISO challenge. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant
Fig. 3RANKL blockade retards ISO-induced osteopenia through inhibiting osteoclastic miR-21. a TRAP staining of osteoclasts (Oc) formed in direct co-culture with osteoblasts (Ob). Bars: 100 μm. *P < 0.05 compared to the WT-Ob without ISO group; #P < 0.05 compared to the WT-Ob with ISO group. b MiR-21 expression levels in isolated osteoclasts (Oc) and osteoblasts (Ob). c, d Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. e, f TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. g, h Calcein labeling of mineralized femoral surface and quantification of bone formation rates. Bars: 50 μm. i, j Toluidine blue staining showing osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 12.5 μm. k ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. n = 4 per group (a), n = 3 per group (b) and n = 5 per group (c–k). RANK-Fc injected with or without osteoclast-targeted delivery of agomir-21 (Oc-agomir-21) was performed under the ISO challenge. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant
Fig. 4Antiresorptive therapy by clodronate is sufficient to ameliorate bone loss against the ISO challenge. a, b IF staining of the macrophage markers, F4/80 and Cd11c, in distal femora. Bars: 100 μm. c MiR-21 expression levels in femoral samples. d, e TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. f, g Calcein labeling of mineralized femoral surface and quantification of bone formation rates. Bars: 50 μm. h, i Toluidine blue staining showing osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 12.5 μm. j ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. k, l Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. n = 6 per group (a, c–l) and n = 3 per group (b). Clodronate injection was performed under the ISO challenge. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant
Fig. 5Targeted inhibition of osteoclastic miR-21 counteracts osteopenia triggered by psychological stress. a, b Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. c, d TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. e ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. f–h Calcein double labeling and toluidine blue images of mineralized femoral surface and osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 50 μm (up) and 12.5 μm (down). n = 5 per group. Osteoclast-targeted delivery of antagomir-21 (Oc-antagomir-21) or its negative control (Oc-NC) was performed under the CVS modeling. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant
Fig. 6Protection of bone mass under psychological stress is achieved by pharmacological suppression of osteoclastogenesis. a, b Micro-CT analysis of femoral bone mass and trabecular parameters. Bars: 500 μm. c, d TRAP staining for osteoclasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. White dashed lines indicate borders of the trabecular bone. Bars: 12.5 μm. e ELISA analysis of serum bone remodeling markers. f–h Calcein double labeling and toluidine blue images of mineralized femoral surface and osteoblasts (black arrows indicated) and the quantification. Bars: 50 μm (up) and 12.5 μm (down). n = 6 per group. RANK-Fc or clodronate was injected under the CVS modeling. Mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; NS not significant