| Literature DB >> 35914137 |
Amanda K Casey1, Hillery F Gray1,2, Suneeta Chimalapati1,2, Genaro Hernandez1, Andrew T Moehlman3, Nathan Stewart1,2, Hazel A Fields1, Burak Gulen1, Kelly A Servage1,2, Karoliina Stefanius1,2,4, Aubrie Blevins1, Bret M Evers5, Helmut Krämer3,4, Kim Orth1,2,6.
Abstract
The proper balance of synthesis, folding, modification, and degradation of proteins, also known as protein homeostasis, is vital to cellular health and function. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is activated when the mechanisms maintaining protein homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum become overwhelmed. However, prolonged or strong UPR responses can result in elevated inflammation and cellular damage. Previously, we discovered that the enzyme filamentation induced by cyclic-AMP (Fic) can modulate the UPR response via posttranslational modification of binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP) by AMPylation during homeostasis and deAMPylation during stress. Loss of fic in Drosophila leads to vision defects and altered UPR activation in the fly eye. To investigate the importance of Fic-mediated AMPylation in a mammalian system, we generated a conditional null allele of Fic in mice and characterized the effect of Fic loss on the exocrine pancreas. Compared to controls, Fic-/- mice exhibit elevated serum markers for pancreatic dysfunction and display enhanced UPR signaling in the exocrine pancreas in response to physiological and pharmacological stress. In addition, both fic-/- flies and Fic-/- mice show reduced capacity to recover from damage by stress that triggers the UPR. These findings show that Fic-mediated AMPylation acts as a molecular rheostat that is required to temper the UPR response in the mammalian pancreas during physiological stress. Based on these findings, we propose that repeated physiological stress in differentiated tissues requires this rheostat for tissue resilience and continued function over the lifetime of an animal.Entities:
Keywords: AMPylation; ER stress; Fic; pancreas; unfolded protein response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35914137 PMCID: PMC9371680 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2208317119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779
Fig. 1.Conditional deletion of Fic. (A) A schematic representation of wild-type and floxed allele of Fic (Fic) in which LoxP sites were inserted into intron 2 and exon 3 of the Fic gene. A 6 amino acid FLAG sequence was added to the C terminus of the Fic ORF. (B) Quantification of Fic and BiP mRNA analyzed by qPCR from Fic (blue bar) and Fic (orange bar) mouse liver after 12 h fasting. n = 3. Bars indicate mean relative expression and error bars represent SE. Fic mRNA was below detection cutoff in Fic samples. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using an unpaired t test. N.D., not detected; ns, not significant; ***P < 0.001. (C) Representative image of Fic and vimentin immunohistochemistry in coronal section of murine third ventricle. (Scale bar, 200 μM.) (D) Representative Western blot of liver lysates isolated from Fic and Fic mice. Blots were probed with anti-AMP, anti-BiP, and anti-actin antibodies. Asterisks (*) indicate reactivity to AMP antibody unrelated to Fic expression.
Fig. 2.Response of fasted-fed Ficfl/fl and Fic−/− pancreata. (A) A schematic representation of fasted, fasted-fed, and fasted-fed-recovery experimental conditions. (B) Quantification of serum amylase in Fic mice under fasted, fasted-fed, and fasted-fed-recovery conditions. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using a two-way ANOVA. n = 8. Bars indicate mean and error bars represent SE. (C) Quantification of serum lipase in Fic mice under fasted, fasted-fed, and fasted-fed-recovery conditions. n = 8. Bars indicate mean and error bars represent SE. (D) Representative Western blot of P2 lysate fractions isolated from Fic and Fic pancreas. Blots were probed with anti-AMP, anti-BiP, and anti-tubulin antibodies. (E) Quantification of relative anti-phospho-eiF2α to anti-p-eiF2α shown in Fig. S8. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using two-way ANOVA. n = 3. (F) Quantification of relative phospho-Ire1 shown in Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using a two-way ANOVA. n = 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 3.UPR signaling in fasted-fed Ficfl/fl and Fic−/− pancreata. (A–F) Quantification of BiP, ATF4, Xbp1s, Chop, ATF3, and Fgf21 mRNA analyzed by qPCR from Fic (blue bar) and Fic (orange bar) mouse pancreas after fasting, fast-feeding, and fast-feed-recovery. Expression values were normalized to that of the housekeeping gene U36B4. Bars indicate mean relative expression compared to fasted controls, and error bars represent SE. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using a two-way ANOVA. n = 8. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Fig. 4.Caerulein-induced pancreatitis in Ficfl/fl and Fic−/− mice. (A) A schematic representation of caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis induction. (B, C) Quantification of serum amylase and lipase in Fic mice over 72 h of caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. Bars indicate mean and error bars represent SE. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using an two-way ANOVA. n = 5–7. ****P < 0.0001.
Fig. 5.Fic is required for recovery after stress. (A) Quantification of flies possessing intact deep DPPs at each indicated time. Bars indicate mean, and error bars represent SE. N = ∼150. (B) Quantification of serum amylase and lipase in Fic mice 7 d after caerulein-induced acute pancreatitis. Bars indicate mean, and error bars represent SE. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using an two-way ANOVA. n = 6–8. (C) Representative hematoxylin and eosin stained images of pancreas of Fic and Fic mice 7 d after treatment with saline or caerulein. (D) Quantification of pancreas with fibrosis, Fic and Fic mice 7 d after treatment with saline or caerulein. Bars indicate mean, and error bars represent SE. Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 using an 2-way ANOVA. n = 13–16. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Histopathological scoring of caerulein pancreatitis after 1 wk recovery
| Genotype | Treatment | Edema | Inflammation | Necrosis | Fibrosis | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Saline | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
|
| Caerulein | 0 ± 0 | 0.13 ± 0.085 | 0 ± 0 | 0.31 ± 0.18 | 0.44 ± 0.24 |
|
| Saline | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
|
| Caerulein | 0.08 ± 0.077 | 0.39 ± 0.18 | 0.077 ± 0.077 | 0.92 ± 0.25 | 1.46 ± 0.48 |
Average scores +/− SEM.
Fig. 6.Model of Fic tempering of UPR.