| Literature DB >> 35912300 |
Roghayeh Dehghan1, Mahdiyeh Behnam2, Mansoor Salehi1,3,4, Roya Kelishadi5.
Abstract
Bardet-Biedl syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive form of syndromic obesity which is characterized by retinal degeneration, obesity, polydactyly, cognitive impairment, and renal and urogenital anomalies. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to investigate the underlying mutations in four Iranian children from consanguineous families with a clinical diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS). In three out of four children, we identified one previously reported frameshifting variant in the BBS12 gene (c.265-266delTT, p.L89fs) and two novel nonsense variants in MKKS (c.1196T>G, p.L399X) and BBS7 genes (c.1636C>T, p.Q546X). In the other child, no mutations were detected in known genes for BBS. However, we identified a novel variant in the ALMS1 gene (c.10996delC, p.Q3666fs) indicative of Alström syndrome. All variants were interpreted as pathogenic according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines and confirmed through Sanger sequencing. In conclusion, our results not only expand the spectrum of mutations in BBS and ALMS1 genes but also accentuate the importance of genetic testing for differentiating BBS from Alström syndrome.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35912300 PMCID: PMC9334124 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6110775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Ophthalmol Med
Figure 1Genetic pedigrees supported the autosomal recessive inheritance of syndromic obesity in the cases. (a, b, d) The Sanger sequencing chromatograms of homozygous affected, homozygous normal, and heterozygous carrier individuals for the novel variants in MKKS (BBS6), BBS7, and ALMS1 genes. (c) The confirmation of the known pathogenic variant in the BBS12 gene through Sanger sequencing in the proband.
The interpretation of variants according to the ACMG guideline. LOF = loss of function.
| Case | Candidate variant | The ACMG criteria for pathogenicity met by identified variants | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | c.1196T>G (p.L399X) in | Predicted null variant in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease (PVS1) | Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members (PP1) | Absent in population databases (PM2) | 1 very strong (PVS1) + 1 moderate (PM2) + 1 supporting (PP1) = pathogenic |
| Case 2 | c.1636C>T (p.Q546X) in | Predicted null variant in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease (PVS1) | Cosegregation with disease in multiple affected family members (PP1) | Absent in population databases (PM2) | 1 very strong (PVS1) + (moderate (PM2) + 1 supporting (PP1) = pathogenic |
| Case 3 | c.265-266delTT (p.L89fs) in | Predicted null variant in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease (PVS1) | Reported as pathogenic by a reputable source (PP5) | Absent in population databases (PM2) | 1 very strong (PVS1) + 1 moderate (PM2) + 1 supporting (PP5) = pathogenic |
| Case 4 | c.10996delC (p.Q3666fs) in | Predicted null variant in a gene where LOF is a known mechanism of disease (PVS1) | Variant is within a mutational hot spot (PM1) | Absent in population databases (PM2) | 1 very strong (PVS1) + 2 moderate (PM1 and PM2) = pathogenic |
Figure 2The schematic workflow of WES analysis described from obtaining FASTQ files to Sanger sequencing.