Literature DB >> 35912027

In vitro marginal and internal adaptation of four different base materials used to elevate proximal dentin gingival margins.

Hoda S Ismail1, Ashraf I Ali1, Rabab El Mehesen1, Franklin Garcia-Godoy2,3, Salah H Mahmoud1.   

Abstract

Background: There is still debate about the most appropriate restorative material category to relocate the proximal deep cervical margins, thus, this study aimed to compare the marginal and internal adaptation of four base materials used for deep margin elevation, and to evaluate each base material/overlying composite interface. Material and
Methods: Fifty six molars received class II cavities with dentin/cementum gingival margins. They were divided into four groups and their gingival margins were elevated using either; resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI), highly viscous conventional glass ionomer (HV-GIC), flowable bulk fill resin composite (Bulk Flow) and bioactive ionic resin (Activa). The rest of the cavities were completed with the same overlying composite. Half of each group was either; kept in sterile water for 1 week, or subjected to 18 months water storage and 15,000 thermal cycles. Base materials/gingival dentin interfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope at different magnifications, and percentage of continuous margin (% CM) and maximum gap width (MGW) were analyzed, in addition to base materials/overlying composite interfaces evaluations. % CM values were statistically analyzed using Two-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc tests (at p<0.05) and Pearson's correlation while MGW values were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U tests and Spearmen correlation.
Results: Both Bulk Flow and Activa had better marginal integrity than RMGI and HV-GIC. All base materials were adversely affected by aging. All base materials/overlying composite interfaces were continuous and age defying. Conclusions: In terms of marginal integrity, Bulk Flow and Activa might be preferable for proximal dentin margin elevation under direct restoration compared to the other tested base materials. Key words:Deep proximal margin, interface analysis, marginal quality, open sandwich technique. Copyright:
© 2022 Medicina Oral S.L.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35912027      PMCID: PMC9328484          DOI: 10.4317/jced.59652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent        ISSN: 1989-5488


  29 in total

1.  Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.

Authors:  Andrea Fabianelli; Alessandro Sgarra; Cecilia Goracci; Amerigo Cantoro; Sarah Pollington; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Application of Calcium Silicate Materials After Acid Etching May Preserve Resin-Dentin Bonds.

Authors:  V Aggarwal; S S Bhasin
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.

Authors:  F Al-Harbi; D Kaisarly; A Michna; A ArRejaie; D Bader; M El Gezawi
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Norbert Krämer; Andreas Appelt; Michael Naumann; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations.

Authors:  D Dietschi; R Spreafico
Journal:  Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

6.  Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.

Authors:  Philippe Francois; Elsa Vennat; Stéphane Le Goff; Nathalie Ruscassier; Jean-Pierre Attal; Elisabeth Dursun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Dental adhesion: mechanism, techniques and durability.

Authors:  N Manuja; R Nagpal; I K Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.065

8.  Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region.

Authors:  R A Bresser; D Gerdolle; I A van den Heijkant; L M A Sluiter-Pouwels; M S Cune; M M M Gresnigt
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Efficacy of Direct Restorative Materials in Proximal Box Elevation on the Margin Quality and Fracture Resistance of Molars Restored With CAD/CAM Onlays.

Authors:  T D Grubbs; M Vargas; J Kolker; E C Teixeira
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on CAD/CAM-Fabricated Ceramic Inlays.

Authors:  T J Vertolli; B D Martinsen; C M Hanson; R S Howard; S Kooistra; L Ye
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.