| Literature DB >> 35911739 |
Katarzyna Stefańska1, Martyna Tomaszewicz2, Joanna Dębska-Zielkowska2, Dorota Zamkowska1, Karolina Piekarska2, Justyna Sakowska2, Maciej Studziński2, Bogusław Tymoniuk3, Przemysław Adamski1, Joanna Jassem-Bobowicz4, Piotr Wydra2, Katarzyna Leszczyńska1, Renata Świątkowska-Stodulska5, Sebastian Kwiatkowski6, Krzysztof Preis1, Piotr Trzonkowski2, Natalia Marek-Trzonkowska7,8, Maciej Zieliński2.
Abstract
Hypothesis: The activity of natural killer (NK) cells is considered an important factor for the tolerance of the fetus during pregnancy. The complications of pregnancy, such as hypertensive disorders (HDP), may be therefore associated with this immune compartment.Entities:
Keywords: KIR HLA ligand; gestational hypertension (GH); hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy; immunology; natural killer (NK); preeclampsia (PE)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911739 PMCID: PMC9336683 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.868175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 3Dot plot analysis, CD16 and CD56 antigens on the NK lymphocyte population [3.1]. Expression of CD279, CD94 and perforin in NK subsets from HDP patients (blue) and healthy control patients (green). The cut-off value [#1] was established for the statistically significant parameters: [3.2] CD279 on 56 + 16-, [3.3] CD279 on CD56-16+ NK cells, and [3,4] perforin in CD56+16+NK cells, based on the unstained negative sample signal as a reference [beige].
Figure 1KIR- HLA interactions. KIR receptors present on the NK cells are divided into inhibitory and activating receptors. HLA ligands for the KIR receptors are classified into HLA-C1, -C2, and HLA- Bw4.
Figure 2Study flow diagram.
Patient’s characteristics.
| Patients’ status | HDP n = 41 | Control n = 21 | p* |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 30 ± 4.96 | 31 ± 3.70 | 0.2 |
|
| 36 | 39 | 0.0007* |
|
| 30, 23/41 | 27, 22/36 | 0.0002* |
|
| |||
|
| 30 | 15 | NT |
| | 7 | 4 | NT |
| | 4 | 2 | NT |
Patients did not differ in age, but there was a statistically significant difference in two parameters: length of gestation (p=0.0007) and BMI (p=0.0002).
*Mann-Whitney U-test comparing HDP and control, p<0.05 was considered significant; NT- not tested.
The distribution of missing KIR ligands that occurred in the HDP (PE and GH) and in the healthy control group.
| Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDPs) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| activating KIR | inhibitory KIR | ||||
| number of missing KIR ligands | N | % | number of missing KIR ligands | n | % |
| 0 | 8 | 42 | 0 | 4 | 21 |
| ≥1 | 11 | 58 | ≥1 | 12 | 79 |
| ≥2 | 2 | 11 | ≥2 | 11 | 58 |
| Preeclampsia (PE) | |||||
| activating KIR | inhibitory KIR | ||||
| number of missing KIR ligands | N | % | number of missing KIR ligands | n | % |
| 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| ≥1 | 7 | 78 | ≥1 | 8 | 89 |
| ≥2 | 1 | 11 | ≥2 | 6 | 67 |
| Gestational Hypertension (GH) | |||||
| number of missing KIR ligands | n | % | number of missing KIR ligands | n | % |
| 0 | 6 | 60 | 0 | 3 | 30 |
| ≥1 | 4 | 40 | ≥1 | 7 | 70 |
| ≥2 | 1 | 10 | ≥2 | 5 | 50 |
| Healthy Control (HC) | |||||
| number of missing KIR ligands | n | % | number of missing KIR ligands | n | % |
| 0 | 14 | 74 | 0 | 9 | 47 |
| ≥1 | 5 | 26 | ≥1 | 10 | 53 |
| ≥2 | 1 | 5 | ≥2 | 5 | 26 |
Figure 4Clustering and heatmap analysis of the missing KIR ligand frequency in preeclampsia (PE), gestational hypertension (GH), and control group. Both rows and columns are clustered using the average linkage and the euclidean distance measurement method.
Figure 5Mother-child KIR mismatches in the study groups: Control – healthy control patients, GH - Gestational Hypertension, and PE – Preeclampsia. p<0.05 is considered significant. *p<0.05; ns- not significant.
The AA to Bx KIR phenotype ratio in HDPs and control women.
| Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDPs) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | GH | ||
| AA | Bx | AA | Bx |
| 22% (n=2) | 78% (n=7) | 50% (n=5) | 50% (n=5) |
| Healthy Control (HC) | |||
| AA | Bx | ||
| 47% (n=9) | 53% (n=10) | ||
Figure 6Significant correlations between the number of missing KIR ligands (MSLs) and the percentages of NK subsets. Nonparametric Spearman correlation with 95% confidence interval lines, p<0.05 is considered significant. *p<0.05; **p<0.01, ns- not significant. All – all patients, Control – healthy control patients, HDP- hypertensive disorders of pregnancy patients.
Figure 7Box and whiskers graphs and ROC curves presenting statistically significant parameters that differ between the HDP and the control group. CD279 on CD56+16-, CD56-16+ and perforin in CD56+16+ NK cells. Statistics performed with the U Mann Whitney test, p<0.01,***p<0.001.
Figure 8Box and whiskers graphs show differences when the HDP group is divided into PE and GH. Statistics performed with the Kruskal Wallis test, p<0.05 is considered significant. *p<0.05; **p<0.01, ns- not significant.