| Literature DB >> 35911259 |
Parth Belapurkar1, Arpita Jaiswal1, Sparsh Madaan1.
Abstract
Background Infertility is presently an emanating preventive medicine issue with some severe societal repercussions associated with it. In India, approximately a score percent of couples bear the burden of infertility. Moreover, the declining fertility rates despite effective artificial reproductive techniques and increasing development of modern reproductive medicine from the last two censuses pose an alarm to the demographic progression data. Many studies have highlighted the importance of shifting the research focus to endometrial receptivity for increasing clinical pregnancy. Objective This research aims to compare the efficacy of treatments of vaginal sildenafil citrate and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) intrauterine injection in increasing endometrial thickness (ET). Methodology This was a randomized control trial (RCT) conducted over a two months period. Women seeking infertility treatment were recruited from the hospital's gynecological outpatient department (OPD). After the subjects gave informed consent, their history, clinical examination, and investigations were assessed. From the sixth day of the menstrual cycle, group A and group B had serial trans-vaginal ultra-sonographic evaluations for baseline endometrial thickness measurements. From day six to day 12 of the menstrual cycle, patients of group A were requested to self-administer per vaginal sildenafil citrate 25 mg every six hours. ET was evaluated sonographically on day 12 and day 14 of their menstrual cycle. Patients of group B received G-CSF 300 mcg/ml as intrauterine instillation on day 10 and were evaluated sonographically on day 12 and day 14 of their menstrual cycle. Patients then underwent additional therapy in the form of intrauterine injection (IUI), intracytoplasmic sperm injection with/without embryo transfer (ICSI/ET), or a natural cycle. Paired as well as unpaired t-tests were applied to the study groups to detect significant differences in the measurement of endometrial thickness before and after treatment. Results It was noticed that both sildenafil and G-CSF are agents for increasing endometrial thickness. The mean increase in endometrial thickness in the sildenafil treated group was 3.87 mm, while the mean increase in endometrial thickness in G-CSF treated group was 3.27 mm. Conclusion This study has evidence of better results in improving endometrial thickness in infertile women by using vaginal sildenafil with respect to endometrial growth with an intrauterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim, G-CSF).Entities:
Keywords: efficacy; endometrial thickness (et); granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; infertility; sildenafil
Year: 2022 PMID: 35911259 PMCID: PMC9335401 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Mean baseline characteristics of interventional groups
BMI - body mass index measured as weight in kilograms divided by height in squared meters.
| Measurement points | Group A (mean ± SD) | Group B (mean ± SD) |
| Age (years) at screening | 31.69 ± 6.87 | 31.34 ± 6.37 |
| BMI | 23.32 ± 2.38 | 22.66 ± 2.60 |
Mean difference of endometrial thickness post-treatment in the interventional groups
* significant
ET - endometrial thickness
| Study parameter | Group A | Group B | ||
| Mean difference | p-value | Mean difference | p-value | |
| Baseline ET - 14th day ET | -3.86 | 0.00* | -3.27 | 0.00* |
Figure 1Mean increment in endometrial thickness in study groups on 12th and 14th days
Group A: study group (green) treated with vaginal sildenafil
Group B: study group (blue) treated with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)
ET - endometrial thickness
The comparison of results of different studies regarding pre- and post-infusion endometrial thickness
ET - endometrial thickness; G-CSF - granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
*significant as per the researcher's setting
| Study | Drug intervention | Baseline ET (mm) | Post-infusion ET (mm) | Difference (mm) | p-value |
| This study | vaginal sildenafil | 4.23 ± 0.76 | 8.09 ± 1.08 | 3.87 ± 1.32 | p < 0.05 |
| Al-Assadi et al.[ | vaginal sildenafil | 5.21 ± 1.28 | 7.64 ± 2.02 | 2.43 ± 2.39 | p < 0.001 |
| Takasaki et al. [ | vaginal sildenafil | - | p < 0.001 | ||
| Razieh Dehghani et al. [ | vaginal sildenafil | Mean post-infusion ET = 9.8mm | p < 0.0001 | ||
| Mangal et al.[ | vaginal sildenafil | 5.42 | 9.42 | 4.0 | p < 0.14* |
| This study | G-CSF | 3.93 ± 0.65 | 7.20 ± 0.91 | 3.27 ± 1.12 | p < 0.05 |
| Gleicher et al. [ | G-CSF | 5.2 ± 1.4 | 9.3 ± 2.1 | 2.9 ± 2.0 | p < 0.001 |
| Michal et al. [ | G-CSF | 6.74 ± 1.75 | 8.42 ± 1.73 | 1.68 ± 1.05 | p < 0.0001 |
| Vineet et al. [ | G-CSF | 5.86 ± 0.58 | 6.58 ± 0.84 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | p < 0.001 |
| Davari-tanha et al. [ | G-CSF | 3.6 ± 0.98 | 7.12 ± 0.84 | 3.53 ± 0.88 | p < 0.001 |
Mean endometrial thickness on different days for the interventional groups
ET - endometrial thickness
| Measurement points | Group A (mean ± SD) | Group B (mean ± SD) |
| Baseline ET, mm | 4.22 ± 0.76 | 3.93 ± 0.65 |
| 12th day ET, mm | 6.43 ± 0.98 | 5.94 ± 0.82 |
| 14th day ET, mm | 8.09 ± 1.08 | 7.20 ± 0.91 |