Literature DB >> 9428088

Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature.

A L Greil1.   

Abstract

This essay reviews the literature on the social psychological impact of infertility, paying special attention to the relationship between gender and the infertility experience. It is convenient to divide the literature into articles which explore the possibility that infertility may have psychological causes (Psychogenic Hypothesis) and those which examine the psychological consequences of infertility (Psychological Consequences Hypothesis). The psychogenic hypothesis is now rejected by most researchers, but a related hypothesis, which states that stress may be a causal factor in infertility, is worthy of exploration. The descriptive literature on the psychological consequences of infertility presents infertility as a devastating experience, especially for women. Attempts to test the psychological consequences hypothesis have produced more equivocal results. In general, studies which look for psychopathology have not found significant differences between the infertile and others. Studies which employ measures of stress and self-esteem have found significant differences. The psychological consequences literature is characterized by a number of flaws, including over sampling of women, small sample size, non-representative samples, failure to study those who have not sought treatment, primitive statistical techniques, and an over-reliance on self-reports. Studies on infertility and psychological distress need to take into consideration both the duration of infertility and the duration of treatment. Finding an appropriate set of "controls" is a particularly intractable problem for this area of research. In general, the psychological distress literature shows little regard for the social construction of infertility. By taking what should be understood as a characteristic of a social situation and transforming it into an individual trait, the literature presents what is essentially a medical model of the psycho-social impact of infertility. Most researchers conclude that infertility is a more stressful experience for women than it is for men. Most studies have found that the relationship between gender and infertility distress is not affected by which partner has the reproductive impairment. Future research needs to be better informed by theoretical considerations. Scholars need to pay more attention to the way the experience of infertility is conditioned by social structural realities. New ways need to be developed for better taking into account the processual nature of the infertility experience. Efforts need to be make to include under-studied portions of the infertile population. Finally, more effort needs to be made to better integrate the empirical study of the experience of infertility with important social policy questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9428088     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  118 in total

1.  Infertile Partners' Coping Strategies Are Interrelated - Implications for Targeted Psychological Counseling.

Authors:  L Volmer; S Rösner; B Toth; T Strowitzki; T Wischmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Agatha M Gallo; Karen Kavanaugh; Ellen Olshansky; Alan Schwartz; Ilan Tur-Kaspa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Predictors of Depression in Iranian Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

Authors:  Mojgan Mirghafourvand; Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi; Tahereh Behroozi Lak; Fatemeh Aliasghari
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-11-14

4.  Fertility-related quality of life from two RCT cohorts with infertility: unexplained infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; J C Trussell; LaTasha B Craig; Clarisa Gracia; Hao Huang; Ruben Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory Christman; Christos Coutifaris; Michael Diamond; Susan Jin; Richard S Legro; Randal D Robinson; William D Schlaff; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Complementary and alternative medicine use in infertility: cultural and religious influences in a multicultural Canadian setting.

Authors:  Suzanne C Read; Marie-Eve Carrier; Rob Whitley; Ian Gold; Togas Tulandi; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.579

6.  Responding to Infertility: Lessons From a Growing Body of Research and Suggested Guidelines for Practice.

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2017-10

7.  Normalization as a Strategy for Maintaining Quality of Life While Coping with Infertility in a Pronatalist Culture.

Authors:  Yael Benyamini; Miri Gozlan; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen Slauson-Blevins; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-12-09

9.  Women with spontaneous 46,XX primary ovarian insufficiency (hypergonadotropic hypogonadism) have lower perceived social support than control women.

Authors:  Susan A Orshan; June L Ventura; Sharon N Covington; Vien H Vanderhoof; James F Troendle; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Emotional reaction to diagnosis of infertility in Kuwait and successful clients' perception of nurses' role during treatment.

Authors:  Florence E Omu; Alexander E Omu
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2010-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.