| Literature DB >> 35910637 |
Luis Daniel Prada-Salcedo1,2,3, Juan Pablo Prada-Salcedo4, Anna Heintz-Buschart1,3,5, François Buscot1,3, Kezia Goldmann1.
Abstract
Depending on their tree species composition, forests recruit different soil microbial communities. Likewise, the vertical nutrient gradient along soil profiles impacts these communities and their activities. In forest soils, bacteria and fungi commonly compete, coexist, and interact, which is challenging for understanding the complex mechanisms behind microbial structuring. Using amplicon sequencing, we analyzed bacterial and fungal diversity in relation to forest composition and soil depth. Moreover, employing random forest models, we identified microbial indicator taxa of forest plots composed of either deciduous or evergreen trees, or their mixtures, as well as of three soil depths. We expected that forest composition and soil depth affect bacterial and fungal diversity and community structure differently. Indeed, relative abundances of microbial communities changed more across soil depths than in relation to forest composition. The microbial Shannon diversity was particularly affected by soil depth and by the proportion of evergreen trees. Our results also reflected that bacterial communities are primarily shaped by soil depth, while fungi were influenced by forest tree species composition. An increasing proportion of evergreen trees did not provoke differences in main bacterial metabolic functions, e.g., carbon fixation, degradation, or photosynthesis. However, significant responses related to specialized bacterial metabolisms were detected. Saprotrophic, arbuscular mycorrhizal, and plant pathogenic fungi were related to the proportion of evergreen trees, particularly in topsoil. Prominent microbial indicator taxa in the deciduous forests were characterized to be r-strategists, whereas K-strategists dominated evergreen plots. Considering simultaneously forest composition and soil depth to unravel differences in microbial communities, metabolic pathways and functional guilds have the potential to enlighten mechanisms that maintain forest soil functionality and provide resistance against disturbances.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial pathways; deciduous/evergreen; fungal guilds; microbial indicator taxa; r/K-strategists; random forest
Year: 2022 PMID: 35910637 PMCID: PMC9328770 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.920618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Relative abundances of (A) bacterial and (B) fungal phyla in relation to forest composition, split between deciduous, mixture, and evergreen forests (vertical panels), and soil depths. The data represent values of taxa with a relative abundance higher than 0.1 (for statistical details see Supplementary Tables 3, 4).
Figure 2Diversity and community composition associated with forest compositions and soil depth: (A) Bacterial and (B) Fungal Shannon diversity in relation to evergreen proportions, lines represents linear model estimates and shaded areas represent 95% confidence; (C) Bacterial and (D) Fungal community composition depicted as NMDS scaling based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, and different colors represent the strongest impacting variables according to PERMANOVA (for statistical details see Supplementary Tables 5, 6).
Figure 3GLM of bacterial pathways related to evergreen tree proportion (A) and soil depth (B). Estimates are the intercept of the model and the color represents the slope. Diamonds represent specific pathways that respond with significant differences according to ANOVA (p < 0.05) of the GLM. Pathways with significant effects in relation to evergreen tree proportion and soil depth were labeled with specific pathways (Level 2), and model details are provided in Supplementary Tables 7, 8.
Figure 4GLM of fungal guilds related to evergreen tree proportion (A) and soil depth (B). Estimates are the intercept of the model and the color represents the slope. Diamonds represent specific guilds that respond significantly according to ANOVA (p < 0.05) of the GLM. Fungal guilds with significant effects in relation to evergreen tree proportion and soil depth were labeled with specific guilds (Guild 2), and model details are given in Supplementary Tables 9, 10.
Top 10 bacterial and fungal genera associated with forest composition based on our RF model.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
| GOUTA6 | 4.796 |
| 3.969 |
| 4.147 |
|
| 4.288 |
| 3.707 |
| 3.579 |
|
| 3.975 |
| 3.544 |
| 3.252 |
|
| 3.268 |
| 3.175 |
| 3.043 |
|
| 3.209 |
| 3.135 | OLB12 | 2.926 |
| Unclassified | 3.191 | mle1-7 | 3.003 |
| 2.668 |
| Candidatus Xiphinematobacter | 3.174 |
| 2.904 | Candidatus Xiphinematobacter | 2.592 |
|
| 3.107 |
| 2.627 | JGI_0001001-H03 | 2.569 |
|
| 2.791 |
| 2.614 | GOUTA6 | 2.565 |
|
| 2.66 |
| 2.499 |
| 2.467 |
|
| |||||
|
| 7.339 |
| 7.41 |
| 6.998 |
|
| 6.14 |
| 5.236 |
| 4.999 |
|
| 5.52 | Unclassified Bionectriaceae | 4.778 |
| 4.67 |
|
| 4.316 |
| 4.43 | Unclassified Saccharomycetales | 4.126 |
|
| 4.226 |
| 4.199 |
| 3.682 |
|
| 3.542 |
| 3.947 |
| 3.627 |
|
| 3.478 |
| 3.722 |
| 3.546 |
|
| 3.428 |
| 3.716 |
| 3.336 |
| Unclassified | 3.409 |
| 3.022 |
| 3.238 |
| Unclassified bionectriaceae | 3.295 | Unclassified Saccharomycetales | 2.982 |
| 3.199 |
Genus order is based on the mean decrease in accuracy estimator by each forest composition.
Top 10 bacterial and fungal genera associated with soil depth based on our RF model.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
| Devosia | 7.661 | Devosia | 6.831 | 1921-3 | 6.796 |
| Ferruginibacter | 7.452 | Cytophaga | 4.969 | Rhodoplanes | 5.394 |
| Chthoniobacter | 7.358 | Ferruginibacter | 4.841 | Caulobacter | 5.02 |
| Granulicella | 7.342 | Pandoraea | 4.736 | Devosia | 4.776 |
| Puia | 5.778 | Conexibacter | 3.789 | Mucilaginibacter | 4.687 |
| Pandoraea | 5.774 | Granulicella | 3.604 | HSB OF53-F07 | 4.383 |
| Acidipila | 5.7 | Luteibacter | 3.452 | Paenibacillus | 4.148 |
| Occallatibacter | 5.596 | Nakamurella | 3.338 | Occallatibacter | 4.004 |
| Phenylobacterium | 5.399 | Nocardioides | 3.276 | Edaphobacter | 3.92 |
| Pajaroellobacter | 5.386 | Unclassified | 2.964 | Granulicella | 3.850 |
|
| |||||
| Tomentella | 8.115 | Ilyonectria | 5.032 | Tomentella | 8.936 |
| Cortinarius | 6.979 | Unclassified Agaricomycetes | 4.061 | Unclassified Hyaloscyphaceae | 7.889 |
| Mycena | 6.805 | Unclassified Mortierellales | 3.878 | Neobulgaria | 6.753 |
| Meliniomyces | 6.253 | Neobulgaria | 3.774 | Unclassified Lecanoromycetes | 5.867 |
| Unclassified Mortierellales | 6.176 | Mycena | 3.265 | Elaphomyces | 4.644 |
| Cladophialophora | 6.041 | Cladosporium | 3.107 | Exophiala | 4.38 |
| Unclassified | 5.625 | Ascobolus | 2.963 | Ilyonectria | 4.322 |
| Chloridium | 5.393 | Metarhizium | 2.858 | Cortinarius | 4.103 |
| Unclassified venturiaceae | 5.352 | Unclassified | 2.792 | Hygrophorus | 4.077 |
| Lactarius | 5.245 | Cladophialophora | 2.738 | Unclassified Saccharomycetales | 4.053 |
Genus order is based on the mean decrease accuracy estimator by each soil depth.