| Literature DB >> 31316487 |
Binu M Tripathi1, Hye Min Kim2, Ji Young Jung1, Sungjin Nam1, Hyeon Tae Ju1, Mincheol Kim1, Yoo Kyung Lee1.
Abstract
Permafrost-underlain tundra soils in Northern Hemisphere are one of the largest reservoirs of terrestrial carbon, which are highly sensitive to microbial decomposition due to climate warming. However, knowledge about the taxonomy and functions of microbiome residing in different horizons of permafrost-underlain tundra soils is still limited. Here we compared the taxonomic and functional composition of microbiome between different horizons of soil cores from a moist tussock tundra ecosystem in Council, Alaska, using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The composition, diversity, and functions of microbiome varied significantly between soil horizons, with top soil horizon harboring more diverse communities than sub-soil horizons. The vertical gradient in soil physico-chemical parameters were strongly associated with composition of microbial communities across permafrost soil horizons; however, a large fraction of the variation in microbial communities remained unexplained. The genes associated with carbon mineralization were more abundant in top soil horizon, while genes involved in acetogenesis, fermentation, methane metabolism (methanogenesis and methanotrophy), and N cycling were dominant in sub-soil horizons. The results of phylogenetic null modeling analysis showed that stochastic processes strongly influenced the composition of the microbiome in different soil horizons, except the bacterial community composition in top soil horizon, which was largely governed by homogeneous selection. Our study expands the knowledge on the structure and functional potential of microbiome associated with different horizons of permafrost soil, which could be useful in understanding the effects of environmental change on microbial responses in tundra ecosystems.Entities:
Keywords: Arctic tundra; metagenomics; microbiome; permafrost soil; phylogenetic null modeling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31316487 PMCID: PMC6610311 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1(A) The 2D-electrical resistivity tomographic (ERT) survey result of three coring points. Average relative abundance of dominant (B) bacterial and (C) archaeal taxa associated with different horizons of soil cores sampled from three coring points. Number of samples analyzed in each horizon is given in brackets.
Relative abundance of dominant bacterial and archaeal taxa in different horizons across all soil cores.
| Oi | Oe | OA | A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.7 ± 6.5 (ab) | 22.6 ± 11.0 (a) | 12.6 ± 6.6 (bc) | 5.6 ± 4.9 (c) | |
| 1.5 ± 1.1 (c) | 7.9 ± 4.5 (ab) | 11.2 ± 5.1 (a) | 6.3 ± 4.6 (b) | |
| 6.0 ± 1.9 (a) | 2.4 ± 1.7 (b) | 1.0 ± 0.5 (b) | 2.4 ± 2.2 (b) | |
| 23.0 ± 5.8 | 19.5 ± 8.7 | 28.9 ± 14.8 | 27.1 ± 10.1 | |
| 20.4 ± 6.8 (a) | 14.1 ± 7.5 (b) | 5.7 ± 2.9 (c) | 3.5 ± 3.7 (c) | |
| 0.7 ± 0.7 (b) | 0.7 ± 0.5 (b) | 2.2 ± 2.7 (b) | 13.4 ± 9.0 (a) | |
| AD3 | 1.1 ± 0.6 (b) | 8.8 ± 5.8 (a) | 8.4 ± 8.3 (a) | 1.6 ± 1.5 (b) |
| TM7 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 1.6 | 5.4 ± 10.9 |
| 2.6 ± 1.2 (b) | 1.9 ± 1.8 (b) | 3.5 ± 2.4 (ab) | 5.9 ± 3.8 (a) | |
| 0.1 ± 0.2 (b) | 0.1 ± 0.2 (b) | 1.3 ± 4.6 (b) | 10.1 ± 8.0 (a) | |
| 8.3 ± 4.5 (a) | 6.3 ± 4.4 (a) | 2.9 ± 1.7 (b) | 1.4 ± 1.2 (b) | |
| OD1 | 0.4 ± 0.9 (b) | 1.9 ± 2.5 (ab) | 3.7 ± 2.9 (ab) | 4.2 ± 4.6 (a) |
| 0.3 ± 0.6 (c) | 2.7 ± 1.9 (b) | 5.6 ± 2.4 (a) | 2.8 ± 1.5 (b) | |
| 5.2 ± 1.2 (a) | 1.2 ± 1.0 (b) | 0.4 ± 0.3 (c) | 0.4 ± 0.4 (c) | |
| 2.3 ± 0.6 (a) | 0.7 ± 0.3 (b) | 0.5 ± 0.5 (b) | 0.4 ± 0.5 (b) | |
| MCG | 26.5 ± 30.1 (b) | 38.6 ± 25.0 (b) | 52.8 ± 31.9 (ab) | 68.4 ± 24.7 (a) |
| 70.9 ± 32.5 (a) | 51.9 ± 27.1 (ab) | 36.2 ± 32.0 (b) | 6.3 ± 9.2 (c) | |
| 1.1 ± 2.4 (b) | 1.7 ± 2.8 (b) | 2.0 ± 1.9 (ab) | 15.6 ± 27.4 (a) | |
| 0.4 ± 1.0 (b) | 5.3 ± 8.9 (a) | 4.5 ± 5.5 (a) | 6.0 ± 8.6 (a) | |
Data represent mean ± standard deviation. Within each row, values followed by different letters (in brackets) are statistically different (p < 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 2Non-metric multidimensional scaling plots based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of (A) bacterial and (B) archaeal communities between samples of different soil horizons.
Figure 3Box plot showing variation in Shannon diversity index of (A) bacterial and (B) archaeal communities according to soil horizons.
Figure 4Canonical correspondence analysis of (A) bacterial and (B) archaeal OTU compositions in samples of four different soil horizons.
Figure 5(A) Composition and (B) diversity of functional genes (KEGG level 3) in different soil horizons of permafrost soil cores.
Figure 6Genetic potential for carbon and N metabolism in different horizons of permafrost soil cores. (A) Heatmap of scaled relative abundance of genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). (B) Relative abundance of genes involved in acetogenesis and fermentation. (C) Relative abundance of genes encoding sub-units of key enzymes involved in methanogenesis (methyl coenzyme M reductase, mcrABG) and methanotrophy (particulate methane monooxygenase-pmoABC and soluble methane monooxygenase-mmoXYZ). (D) Relative abundance of genes associated with N cycle. The circle size corresponds to the relative abundance of each gene.
Figure 7The contribution of various deterministic (homogeneous and variable selection) and stochastic processes (homogenizing dispersal, dispersal limitation and drift) that governed the assembly of (A) bacterial and (B) archaeal communities.