| Literature DB >> 35910125 |
Syed M Hussain1, B Shankar Goud2, Prakash Madheshwaran3, Wasim Jamshed4, Amjad Ali Pasha5, Rabia Safdar6, Misbah Arshad7, Rabha W Ibrahim8, Mohammad Kalimuddin Ahmad1.
Abstract
During thermal radiation treatments, heat therapies, and examination procedures like scans and X-rays, the cylindrical blood vessels may get stretched; meanwhile, the blood flow through those blood vessels may get affected due to temperature variations around them. To overcome this issue, this work was framed to explore the impact of heat transmission in a Carreau fluid flow (CFF) through a stretching cylinder in terms of the nonlinear stretching rate and irregular heat source/sink. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and thermal radiation are taken into consideration in this study. To tranform complicated partial differential equations into ordinary differential equations, appropriate similarity variables are used. For a limited set of instances, the derived series solutions are compared to previously published results. For linear and nonlinear stretching rates, graphs and tables are used to examine the influence of an irregular heat source/sink on fluid movement and heat transfer. The research outcomes demonstrate that the heat source and nonlinear stretching rate cause a disruption in the temperature distribution in the fluid region, which can alter the blood flow through the vessels. In all conditions except for the heat in an internal heat sink, the nonlinear stretching situation improves the velocity and heat profile. Furthermore, with the increase in the values of the Weissenberg number, the temperature profile shows opposing features in a shear-thickening fluid and shear-thinning fluid. For the former n > 1, the blood fluidity gets affected, restricting the free movement of blood. For the latter, n < 1, the phenomenon is reversed. Other industrial applications of this work are wire coating, plastic coverings, paper fabrication, fiber whirling, etc. In all of those processes, the fluid flow is manipulated by thermal conditions.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35910125 PMCID: PMC9330264 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic flow geometry diagram of the problem.
Figure 2Flow chart of the shooting technique.
Comparison of CRe1/2 for Various Values of We = 0, n = 1, and m = 1 for Various Values of λ
| Rangi and
Naseem[ | Poply et
al.[ | Hashim et
al.[ | Gangadhar
et al.[ | present study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | –1.0000 | –1.000000 | –1.0000000000 | –1.000000 | |
| 0.1 | –1.036977 | –1.036979 | –1.0369802848 | –1.036980 | |
| 0.25 | –1.094378 | –1.094373 | –1.0943686524 | –1.094368 | |
| 0.3 | –1.111138 | –1.111165 | –1.1111501278 | –1.111150 | |
| 0.5 | –1.188715 | –1.188727 | –1.1886949950 | –1.188694 | |
| 0.7 | –1.257011 | –1.257045 | –1.2570201314 | –1.257024 | |
| 0.75 | –1.281833 | –1.281819 | –1.2818036624 | –1.281803 | |
| 1 | –1.459308 | –1.363865 | –1.453373 | –1.3638700839 | –1.363870 |
Figure 3Velocity vs m.
Figure 4Temperature vs m.
Figure 5Velocity vs n.
Figure 6Temperature vs n.
Figure 7Velocity vs We.
Figure 8Temperature vs We.
Figure 9Velocity vs λ.
Figure 10Temperature vs λ.
Figure 11Temperature vs Pr.
Figure 12Temperature vs ε.
Figure 13Temperature vs Rd.
Figure 14Temperature vs A.
Figure 15Temperature vs B.
Figure 16Nusselt number vs Rd with various values of A.
Figure 18Nusselt number vs Rd with various values of ε.
Values of and with Various Values of m, We, and n and Other Parameters That Are Fixed, i.e., λ = 0.2, m = 0.2, ε = 0.2, Rd = 1, Pr = 6.8, A = 0.3, B = 0.3
| CPU time (sec) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | –0.596090 | 1.388809 | 1.006499 |
| 0.5 | –0.843136 | 1.744996 | 1.013205 | ||
| 1.0 | –1.072648 | 2.114902 | 1.007747 | ||
| 0.1 | 0.3 | –0.593764 | 1.386978 | 1.017418 | |
| 0.5 | –0.588925 | 1.383087 | 1.011327 | ||
| 1 | –0.560993 | 1.358253 | 1.007588 | ||
| 0.3 | –0.596126 | 1.388837 | 1.008981 | ||
| 0.5 | –0.596197 | 1.388893 | 1.029734 |
Values of with Various Values of Pr, Rd, A, and B and the Other Parameters That Are Fixed, i.e., n = 0.2, We = 0.1, λ = 0.2, m = 0.1, e = 0.2
| CPU time (sec) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.264584 | 1.010932 |
| 6.8 | 1.388809 | 1.015686 | |||
| 7 | 1.430511 | 1.007600 | |||
| 3 | 2 | 1.603729 | 1.019074 | ||
| 3 | 1.752820 | 1.017067 | |||
| 4 | 1.893894 | 1.003206 | |||
| 1 | 0.2 | 1.500242 | 1.008116 | ||
| 0 | 1.721061 | 1.004597 | |||
| 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.473194 | 1.005410 | ||
| 0 | 1.629949 | 1.012281 |