| Literature DB >> 35110577 |
Abstract
In this research study, numerical and statistical explorations are accomplished to capture the flow features of the dynamics of ethylene glycol-based hybrid nanofluid flow over an exponentially stretchable sheet with velocity and thermal slip conditions. Physical insight of viscous dissipation, heat absorption and thermal radiation on the flow-field is scrutinized by dissolving the nanoparticles of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and graphene into ethylene glycol. The governing mathematical model is transformed into the system of similarity equations by utilizing the apt similarity variables. The numerical solution of resulting similarity equations with associated conditions are obtained employing three-stages Lobatto-IIIa-bvp4c-solver based on a finite difference scheme in MATLAB. The effects of emerging flow parameters on the flow-field are enumerated through various graphical and tabulated results. Additionally, to comprehend the connection between heat transport rate and emerging flow parameters, a quadratic regression approximation analysis on the numerical entities of local Nusselt numbers and skin friction coefficients is accomplished. The findings disclose that the suction and thermal radiation have an adverse influence on the skin friction coefficients and heat transport rate. Further, a slight augmentation in the thermal slip factor causes a considerable variation in the heat transport rate in comparison to the radiation effect.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35110577 PMCID: PMC8810919 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05703-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Physical representation of the problem.
Thermophysical properties and relations of hybrid nanofluids[56,57].
| Properties | Hybrid nanofluid |
|---|---|
| Heat capacity | |
| Dynamic viscosity | |
| Density | |
| Thermal conductivity | |
| Electrical conductivity |
The physical properties of ethylene glycol, graphene and MoS2[2,35].
| Ethylene glycol | Graphene | MoS2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1115 | 2250 | 5060 | |
| 0.253 | 2500 | 904.4 | |
| 2430 | 2100 | 397.21 | |
| 0.20 | 0.025 | 0.030 |
Comparison of obtained numerical entities of with existing results of Wahid et al.[37].
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.459270 | 1.459271 |
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.513239 | 1.513242 |
| 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.565144 | 1.565149 |
| 0.3 | 0.2 | 2.156547 | 2.156546 |
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.165551 | 1.165554 |
| 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.513240 | 1.513242 |
Figure 2Effects of M on the dispersal profiles of hybrid (a) velocity and (b) temperature .
Figure 3Effects of on the dispersal profiles of hybrid (a) velocity and (b) temperature .
Figure 4Effects of on the dispersal profiles of hybrid (a) velocity and (b) temperature .
Figure 5Effects of on the dispersal profiles of hybrid (a) velocity and (b) temperature .
Figure 6Hybrid temperature dispersal profiles for varying (a) and (b) .
Figure 7Hybrid temperature dispersal profiles for varying (a) and (b) .
Numerical findings of with velocity slip and without slip conditions.
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.984548 | 0.566347 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.117289 | 0.626290 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.235613 | 0.674850 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.343110 | 0.715361 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.057414 | 0.599995 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.150075 | 0.640188 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.235613 | 0.674850 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 1.315349 | 0.705207 | |
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 1.235613 | 0.674850 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 1.380478 | 0.723757 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 1.538953 | 0.773212 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 1.710059 | 0.822208 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.235613 | 1.064193 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.380478 | 0.952448 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.538953 | 0.854313 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.710059 | 0.768793 | ||
The varying values of influencing parameters are highlighted with bold numbers.
Numerical findings of with velocity slip and without slip conditions.
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.644858 | 1.558717 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.485001 | 1.440140 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | ||
| 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.209569 | 1.266830 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.557357 | 1.492048 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.445241 | 1.412804 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | |
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.243565 | 1.286309 | |
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.500815 | 1.559598 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.675067 | 1.802270 | ||
| 2.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.858951 | 2.064318 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.155368 | 1.107529 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.041537 | 0.974620 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 0.976806 | 0.903437 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 0.869066 | 0.791272 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.214229 | 1.233974 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.340256 | 1.342592 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.452727 | 1.438924 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.554612 | 1.526204 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.444444 | 1.465916 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.537046 | 1.570846 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 0.1 | 1.621544 | 1.664534 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.668457 | 1.470400 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.013742 | 1.219595 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.686294 | 1.094193 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 1.341105 | 1.344997 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 1.035557 | 1.082022 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.843402 | 0.905065 | ||
| 2.2 | 0.2 | − 0.2 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 0.711398 | 0.777853 | ||
The varying values of influencing parameters are highlighted with bold numbers.
Quadratic regression approximated coefficients of owing to variations in S and L and optimum relative error bound are tabulated as mentioned below.
| 0.5 | − 0.9763 | − 0.4911 | 1.4216 | 0.0136 | − 1.1786 | 0.5344 | 0.0125 |
| 1.5 | − 1.1097 | − 0.4060 | 1.6048 | 0.0308 | − 1.2562 | 0.4880 | 0.0144 |
| 2.5 | − 1.2006 | − 0.4460 | 1.8042 | 0.0208 | − 1.4661 | 0.5127 | 0.0077 |
| 3.5 | − 1.2938 | − 0.3564 | 1.8335 | 0.0368 | − 1.3291 | 0.4544 | 0.0060 |
Quadratic regression approximated coefficients of owing to variations in and Tr and also optimum relative error bound are obtained as under.
| 0.04 | − 1.4635 | 2.0210 | − 0.4476 | − 1.6153 | 0.0881 | − 0.1500 | 0.0021 |
| 0.10 | − 1.3098 | 1.8087 | − 0.4229 | − 1.4882 | 0.0728 | − 0.0924 | 0.0024 |
| 0.16 | − 1.1588 | 1.6332 | − 0.3970 | − 1.4195 | 0.0626 | − 0.0831 | 0.0030 |
| 0.22 | − 1.0032 | 1.4118 | − 0.3805 | − 1.2201 | 0.0570 | − 0.0345 | 0.0035 |