| Literature DB >> 35909823 |
Edeh Michael Onyema1, Khalid K Almuzaini2, Fergus Uchenna Onu3, Devvret Verma4, Ugboaja Samuel Gregory5, Monika Puttaramaiah6, Rockson Kwasi Afriyie7.
Abstract
The study examines the prospects and challenges of machine learning (ML) applications in academic forecasting. Predicting academic activities through machine learning algorithms presents an enhanced means to accurately forecast academic events, including the academic performances and the learning style of students. The use of machine learning algorithms such as K-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest, bagging, artificial neural network (ANN), and Bayesian neural network (BNN) has potentials that are currently being applied in the education sector to predict future events. Many gaps in the traditional forecasting techniques have greatly been bridged by the use of artificial intelligence-based machine learning algorithms thereby aiding timely decision-making by education stakeholders. ML algorithms are deployed by educational institutions to predict students' learning behaviours and academic achievements, thereby giving them the opportunity to detect at-risk students early and then develop strategies to help them overcome their weaknesses. However, despite the benefits associated with the ML approach, there exist some limitations that could affect its correctness or deployment in forecasting academic events, e.g., proneness to errors, data acquisition, and time-consuming issues. Nonetheless, we suggest that machine learning remains one of the promising forecasting technologies with the power to enhance effective academic forecasting that would assist the education industry in planning and making better decisions to enrich the quality of education.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909823 PMCID: PMC9337975 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5624475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Summary of related works.
| Authors | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Musso et al. [ | The study successfully forecasted students' academic success one year ahead using the ANN based on cognitive and demographic traits |
| Hudson and Cristiano [ | The results suggest that ML can generate dependable results in prediction |
| Elhaj et al. [ | The study was empirical, and it showed the ability of KNN in prediction of learning patterns of students |
| Ahajjam et al. [ | The paper provided AI-based solutions to track students' performance and was able to recommend diagnosis for the Moroccan students |
| Pranav et al. [ | The paper provided evidence on the significance of AI in management of education data and decision-making |
| Lidia et al. [ | The paper concluded that ML will be required more in the future because of the need to assist students to overcome learning difficulties and also enhance their productivity in learning |
| Phauk and Takeo [ | The study recommended the use of the hybrid machine learning algorithm approach to solve misclassification issues and improve academic prediction accuracy |
| Onan and Korukoğlu [ | The research proposed an ensemble method to feature selection that combines the results of numerous independent feature lists generated by various features that may be used in education |
| Onan [ | The study provided a better approach for managing students' information system via ML |
| Hassen et al. [ | The study showed that the student's success with the aid of machine learning can be monitored using their previous performance data before they engaged in the current program |
| Ibtehal [ | The study affirmed the applicability of ML in education technology development and deployment |
| Feders and Anders [ | They developed a smart algorithm that assessed the teaching methods of teachers and how it affects the understanding of their lessons by students in the class taking into consideration the former knowledge of students |
| Popenici and Kerr [ | They examined the various implications of ML and other relevant AI-driven systems in higher education |
Machine learning-based forecasting vs. traditional forecasting technique.
| Machine learning forecasting | Traditional forecasting |
|---|---|
| It gives more accurate predictions with minimal loss function [ | Forecast errors are more likely to occur [ |
| The approach is more scientifically driven [ | Suffers a lot from assumptions leading to subjective conclusions at times [ |
| Very demanding in computation [ | Less demanding computation |
| It is more prone to underfitting and overfitting issues [ | Less prone to underfitting and overfitting issues |
| Focuses more on result or outcome, but silent relationships among variables. | Relationship between variables are often highlighted |
| Highly recommended in applications where the goal is to learn from datasets with a large number of characteristics [ | Suitable in univariate applications often meant to assess and summarize data. |
| It can work with massive data | It works with limited or historical data |
Figure 1The traditional forecasting approach [41].
Figure 2Machine learning forecasting approach [41].
Figure 3Benefits of machine learning in academic setting and forecasting.