| Literature DB >> 35281546 |
K R Pradeep1, Syam Machinathu Parambil Gangadharan2, Wesam Atef Hatamleh3, Hussam Tarazi4, Piyush Kumar Shukla5, Basant Tiwari6.
Abstract
The field of image processing is distinguished by the variety of functions it offers and the wide range of applications it has in biomedical imaging. It becomes a difficult and time-consuming process for radiologists to do the manual identification and categorization of the tumour. It is a complex and time-consuming procedure conducted by radiologists or clinical professionals to remove the contaminated tumour region from magnetic resonance (MR) pictures. It is the goal of this study to improve the performance and reduce the complexity of the image segmentation process by investigating FCM predicted image segmentation procedures in order to reduce the intricacy of the process. Furthermore, relevant characteristics are collected from each segmented tissue and aligned as input to the classifiers for autonomous identification and relegation of encephalon cancers in order to increase the accuracy and quality rate of the neural network classifier. An evaluation, validation, and presentation of the experimental performance of the suggested approach have been completed. A unique APSO (accelerated particle swarm optimization) based artificial neural network model (ANNM) for the relegation of benign and malignant tumours is presented in this study effort, which allows for the automated identification and categorization of brain tumours. Using APSO training to improve the suggested ANNM model parameters would give a unique method to alleviate the stressful work of radiologists performing manual identification of encephalon cancers from MR images. The use of an APSO-based ANNM (artificial neural network model) model for automated brain tumour classification has been presented in order to demonstrate the resilience of the classification model. It has been suggested to utilise the improved enhanced fuzzy c means (IEnFCM) method for image segmentation, while the GLCM (gray level co-occurrence matrix) feature extraction approach has been employed for feature extraction from magnetic resonance imaging (MR pictures).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281546 PMCID: PMC8913064 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1128217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1General functions involved in tumor diagnosis process.
Figure 2Work process of (APSO (accelerated particle swarm optimization) based artificial neural network model (ANNM).
Figure 3Process of applying median filter in MRI brain image: (a) image with noise and (b) image after noise removal.
Figure 4(a) Input image and (b) after edge detection.
Figure 5ANN structure.
Parameters definition for ANN.
| Parameters | Initial values |
|---|---|
| Activation functions | “Purelin” and “tansig” |
| Nodes in hidden layer | 16 |
| Learning model | Levenberg–Marquadrt backpropagation |
| Learning rate | 0.005 |
| Number of epochs | 500 |
| Mean square error | 10–5 |
| Minimum error | 0.002 |
| Momentum rate | 0.6 |
| Training time | 50 seconds |
Figure 6Sample brain images from DICOM data set.
Figure 7Brian images diagnosed with tumor.
Figure 8Performance analysis graph.
Figure 9Accuracy rate comparisons.
Figure 10Evaluation of methods with performance measures.
Figure 11Processing time comparisons.
Figure 12Training images.
Figure 13Testing images.
Input feature parameters using feature extraction.
| Images/features | Mean | Standard deviation | Entropy (bits/pixel) | Contrast | Correlation | Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9280 | 16.4988 | 0.0567 | 0.0689 | 0.6971 | 0.3648 |
| 2 | 0.5689 | 17.3836 | 0.0697 | 0.6791 | 0.8799 | 0.5678 |
| 3 | 0.3598 | 16.9167 | 0.0689 | 0.0359 | 0.6946 | 0.7861 |
| 4 | 0.8857 | 13.8738 | 0.0689 | 0.0264 | 0.9647 | 0.6871 |
| 5 | 0.2678 | 12.4463 | 0.0698 | 0.0698 | 0.9764 | 0.8674 |
Performance metrics comparison
| Performance metrics | SVM [ | Fuzzy logic [ | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 95.5. | 97.68 | 99.875 |
| Sensitivity | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Specificity | 0.85 | 0.90 | 1.0 |