| Literature DB >> 35909460 |
Abobakr Almansob1, Ali H Bahkali1, Ahmed Albarrag2, Mohammad Alshomrani3, Abdulwahab Binjomah3, Waleed A Hailan4, Fuad Ameen1.
Abstract
Drug resistance in filamentous fungus to antifungal medicines is a huge problem in biomedical applications; so, an effective strategy for treating opportunistic fungal infections is needed. Mentha piperita is a very fascinating plant to treat a variety of ailments as home remedies. Eighteen strains of Aspergillus species were used for this study which are having a unique antifungal resistance profile in presence of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). AgNPs were prepared, using an aqueous extract of M. Piperita and characterized it by various techniques. Structural properties of AgNPs were systematically studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and Raman measurement, which emanate the single-phase fcc structure of silver nanoparticles. The spherical nature and elemental analysis of as-synthesized AgNPs were confirmed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, respectively. The optical study has been analyzed using UV-Vis spectroscopy and band gap was calculated as 2.51 eV, using Tauc plot. To analyze and validate the good efficacy of the disc approach, antifungal activity of AgNPs nanoparticles in different concentrations against isolates was achieved in both disc and broth microdilution. The extracellular enzymatic activity of A. fumigatus was found to explore the precise impact of nanoparticles on fungal metabolism. The antifungal efficacy of AgNPs against all fungi was highly successful in disc method. The broth approach underlined the favorable results of the disc method. It provided more precise results in determining the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC), as well as the minimum effective concentration (MEC). A. fumigatus (AM6) enzymatic activity was boosted by AgNPs. Also, ß-galactosidase, ß-glucuronidase, and ß-glucosidase are necessary enzymes whose activity has been boosted. Consequently, M. piperita AgNPs can play a major and intriguing function against resistant Aspergillus species with a significant shift in the enzymatic activity profile of fungi due to this action. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; Enzymatic activity; Mentha piperita; Silver nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909460 PMCID: PMC9307438 DOI: 10.1007/s13204-022-02539-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Nanosci ISSN: 2190-5517 Impact factor: 3.869
List of isolated fungi and their Genbank accession numbers
| No | Fungi and (strain) | NCBI | Similarity% | Practical code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OK396684 | 100% | 1.1 | |
| 2 | OK396685 | 100% | 1.2 | |
| 3 | OK396686 | 100% | 1.3 | |
| 4 | OK396687 | 100% | 1.4 | |
| 5 | OK396688 | 100% | 1.5 | |
| 6 | OK396689 | 100% | 2.1 | |
| 7 | OK396690 | 100% | 2.2 | |
| 8 | OK396691 | 100% | 3.1 | |
| 9 | OK396692 | 100% | 3.2 | |
| 10 | OK396693 | 100% | 4 | |
| 11 | OK396694 | 100% | 5 | |
| 12 | OK396695 | 100% | 6 | |
| 13 | OK396696 | 100% | 7 | |
| 14 | – | – | 8 | |
| 15 | OK396697 | 100% | 9 | |
| 16 | OK396698 | 100% | 10 | |
| 17 | OK396699 | 100% | 11 | |
| 18 | OK396700 | 100% | 12 |
Fig. 1AgNPs formation using Mentha piperita (1 min-4 h)
Fig. 2XRD spectrum of AgNPs using Mentha piperita with JCPDS spectrum (04–0783)
Fig. 3TEM micrograph (a): insets show the corresponding HRTEM fringe pattern and SAED ring pattern, and particle size distribution using Gaussian curve fitting (b) of AgNPs
Fig. 4FT-IR spectrum of AgNPs using Mentha piperita
Fig. 5Raman spectrum of AgNPs using Mentha piperita
Fig. 6EDX analysis of AgNPs using Mentha piperita: inset shows the corresponding SEM image
Fig. 7UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs (a): inset shows the Tauc plot for band gap calculation, and UV–Vis absorption spectra of Mentha piperita extract (b)
Efficacy of different concentrations of AgNPs of Mentha piperita against tested fungi (Disc technique)
| No | Fungi | Inhibition zone (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs | ||||||
| 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 1000 | ||
| 1 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 2 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 6.3 ± 0.6 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 3 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 8 ± 1 | |
| 4 | 8.3 ± 0.6 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 1.2 | 12.3 ± 1.2 | |
| 5 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 9 ± 2 | 9.7 ± 1.5 | 12.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 6 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 11.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 7 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 9.7 ± 0.6 |
| 8 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 10.7 ± 0.6 |
| 9 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 10 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 6.3 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 11 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 8.0 ± 0 | 8.0 ± 0 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 12 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 7.3 ± 0.6 |
| 13 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 7.3 ± 0.6 |
| 14 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.6 | |
| 15 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 6.3 ± 0.6 |
| 16 | A. | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 9.7 ± 1.5 |
| 17 | 6.7 ± 0.6 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 10.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 18 | 9.3 ± 1.5 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 12.0 ± 1 | 12.3 ± 1.2 | 14.3 ± 1.2 | |
Efficacy of different concentrations of AgNPs of Mentha piperita against susceptible fungi with disc method (Broth microdilution technique)
| NO | Fungi | Growth rate (scores/4) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs | ||||||
| 25 | 50 | 100 | 200 | 1000 | ||
| 1 | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0**F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 2 | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0**F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 3 | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 4 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 |
| 5 | A. | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 |
| 6 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 7 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0** | 0 ± 0 F |
| 8 | A. | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0** | 0 ± 0 F | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| 9 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | |
| 10 | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | |
| 11 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 |
| 12 | A. | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 |
| 13 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 2 ± 0* | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** | 0 ± 0 F |
| 14 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 15 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 1 ± 0* | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| 16 | A. | 0 ± 0*** F | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| 17 | 3 ± 0* | 2 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 0 ± 0** F | 0 ± 0 | |
| 18 | A. | 4 ± 0 | 4 ± 0 | 3 ± 0* | 0 ± 0**F | 0 ± 0 |
*MEC, **MIC, ***MEC&MIC& FM
Fig. 8Efficacy of AgNPs on extracellular enzymes activity of A. fumigatus (AM6)