| Literature DB >> 35909198 |
Hidetoshi Shidahara1, Tomoyuki Abe2, Akihiko Oshita1,3, Yusuke Sumi1, Hiroshi Okuda1, Manabu Kurayoshi1, Shuji Yonehara4, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi3, Hideki Ohdan3, Toshio Noriyuki1,3, Masahiro Nakahara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed onset of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) > 5 years after primary colorectal surgery is rare. Herein, we report a case of delayed-onset CRLM that occurred 10 years after primary surgery, for which laparoscopic hepatectomy was performed. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Colorectal liver metastasis; Delayed onset; Metachronous
Year: 2022 PMID: 35909198 PMCID: PMC9339449 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01503-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2198-7793
Fig. 1Positron emission tomography–computed tomography shows a tumor with abnormal accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose at liver S7/8
Fig. 2A, B Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows a tumor measuring 23 mm in size with ring enhancement in the early phase (arrow). The tumor shows hypointensity in the delayed phase (arrow)
Fig. 3A, B Gadolinium–ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showing a tumor as a hyperintense lesion without central filling on the T2-weighted image (arrow) and a hypointense lesion in the hepatobiliary phase (arrow)
Fig. 4Histological examination reveals tall columnar tumor cells forming small glandular duct structures. The pathological diagnosis is moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×10)
Fig. 5A–C Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the tumor was positive for caudal-type homeobox protein 2 and negative for CK7 and CK20. (Staining, ×10)
Characteristics of patients with delayed metachronous CRLM treated with hepatectomy
| Case | Age (years) | Sex | Lesion | pTN | TNM stage | Primary tumor differentiation | Lymphovascular invasion | Interval from primary tumor to CRLM (months) | Tumor number | Tumor location | Recurrence-free survival from hepatectomy (months) | Status | Cause of death |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | M | Rs | pT3 N1 | IIIa | tub1 | ly0, v1 | 60 | 1 | S5 | 9 | Dead | Other (SAH) |
| 2 | 76 | M | S | pT1b N0 | I | tub1 | ly2, v1 | 98 | 2 | S5, S7 | u/a | u/a | – |
| 3 | 56 | M | A | pT3 N0 | II | tub2 | ly0, v0 | 112 | 1 | S4/5 | 27 | Alive | – |
| 4 | 58 | M | S | pT3 N0 | II | tub2 | ly0, v0 | 84 | 1 | S6/7 | 24 | Alive | – |
| 5 | 77 | M | Rs | pT3 N0 | II | tub2 | ly2, v2 | 132 | 1 | S7 | 18 | Alive | – |
| Our case | 68 | M | T, S | pT1N0 and pT3N0 | I,II | tub2 and pap | ly1, v0 and ly0, v0 | 120 | 1 | S7/8 | 12 | Alive | – |
A: ascending colon; M: male; N: nodes; Rs: rectosigmoid colon; SAH: subarachnoid hemorrhage; S: sigmoid colon; T: transverse colon; TNM: tumor–node–metastasis