Ni-Jie Li1, Qing-Yun Yao1, Xiao-Qiong Yuan1, Yong Huang1, Yu-Feng Li2. 1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095, Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, People's Republic of China. 2. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095, Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, People's Republic of China. tjlyf66@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To update the evidence of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) as predictive factors for live birth outcome in women undergoing assisted conception and discover the modulating effect of age. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for studies published until June 2021. We included studies that measured serum AMH levels and reported the subsequent live birth outcomes. Random effects models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) models were used. The QUADAS-2 checklist was employed to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 27 studies (27,029 women) investigating the relationship between AMH and live birth outcome after assisted conception. The diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) from random effects models were ruled out due to high heterogeneity. Our findings suggested that AMH was associated with live birth. The DOR was 2.21 (95% CI 1.89-2.59), and 2.49 (95% CI 1.26-4.91) for studies on women with unspecified ovarian reserve and women with low ovarian reserve, respectively. The DOR of those with advanced ages was 2.50 (95% CI 1.87-2.60). For younger women, the DOR was 1.41 (95% CI 0.99-2.02). HSROCs showed that AMH had no predictive ability towards live birth in women with diminished ovarian reserve or younger age. Exclusion of Chinese cohorts lowered the heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that AMH had better prediction for live birth in advanced-age women. AMH may have implicative predictive value for assisted conception counseling of couples of advanced ages.
PURPOSE: To update the evidence of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) as predictive factors for live birth outcome in women undergoing assisted conception and discover the modulating effect of age. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for studies published until June 2021. We included studies that measured serum AMH levels and reported the subsequent live birth outcomes. Random effects models and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) models were used. The QUADAS-2 checklist was employed to assess the quality of the included studies. RESULTS: We included 27 studies (27,029 women) investigating the relationship between AMH and live birth outcome after assisted conception. The diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) from random effects models were ruled out due to high heterogeneity. Our findings suggested that AMH was associated with live birth. The DOR was 2.21 (95% CI 1.89-2.59), and 2.49 (95% CI 1.26-4.91) for studies on women with unspecified ovarian reserve and women with low ovarian reserve, respectively. The DOR of those with advanced ages was 2.50 (95% CI 1.87-2.60). For younger women, the DOR was 1.41 (95% CI 0.99-2.02). HSROCs showed that AMH had no predictive ability towards live birth in women with diminished ovarian reserve or younger age. Exclusion of Chinese cohorts lowered the heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that AMH had better prediction for live birth in advanced-age women. AMH may have implicative predictive value for assisted conception counseling of couples of advanced ages.
Authors: Jeff G Wang; Nataki C Douglas; Gary S Nakhuda; Janet M Choi; Susanna J Park; Melvin H Thornton; Michael M Guarnaccia; Mark V Sauer Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: E Rajpert-De Meyts; N Jørgensen; N Graem; J Müller; R L Cate; N E Skakkebaek Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-07-21
Authors: A La Marca; G Sighinolfi; D Radi; C Argento; E Baraldi; A Carducci Artenisio; G Stabile; A Volpe Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Stamatina Iliodromiti; Thomas W Kelsey; Olivia Wu; Richard A Anderson; Scott M Nelson Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 15.610