Literature DB >> 16167941

Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?

S Muttukrishna1, H McGarrigle, R Wakim, I Khadum, D M Ranieri, P Serhal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B and antral follicle count (AFC) with ovarian response.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Fertility unit. SAMPLE: AFC was recorded, and a serum sample obtained on day 3 from all patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Patients were given 300 IU/L recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal F). The following day blood samples were collected. METHODS Serum samples were assayed for FSH, AMH and inhibin B using commercial immunoassay kits and oestradiol using an in house assay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to gonadotrophin stimulation and the number of eggs collected.
RESULTS: AFC was negatively correlated to age (r=-0.426, P < 0.001). Delta inhibin B (levels of inhibin B on day 4 minus day 3) had the best association to the number of eggs collected (r= 0.533, P < 0.001) followed by basal AMH (r= 0.51, P < 0.001) and AFC (r= 0.505, P < 0.001). The number of eggs fertilised was significantly associated with basal AMH (r= 0.592, P < 0.001) and inhibin B (r= 0.548, P < 0.001). AMH with a cutoff of 0.2 ng/mL had the best sensitivity (87%) and specificity (64%) in predicting poor response. A cumulative score using basal FSH, basal AMH, delta E2 (levels of oestradiol on day 4 minus day 3), delta inhibin B, AFC and age gives the best predictive statistics to identify poor responders with 87% sensitivity and 80% specificity and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.36.
CONCLUSION: Delta inhibin B had the best positive association with the number of eggs collected and basal AMH is the single best predictor of poor response. AFC has a significant association with the number of eggs collected and is predictive of clinical pregnancy. It is evident that a single parameter is of limited value in predicting ovarian response. However, we have demonstrated a cumulative score using all the above markers could be useful in predicting poor response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16167941     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  45 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa e Silva; Júlio César Rosa e Silva; Rosana Maria dos Reis; Rui Alberto Ferriani; Marcos Felipe Silva de Sá
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Anti mullerian hormone: a potential marker for recruited non growing follicle of ovarian pool in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  P Saikumar; Vs Kalai Selvi; K Prabhu; Prasana Venkatesh; Prashanth Krishna
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

3.  Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Mehmet Erdem; Ahmet Erdem; Sule Yildiz; Ilknur Mutlu; Ozgur Arisoy; Mesut Oktem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Subclinical impairment of ovarian reserve in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with normal menstruation not using alkylating therapy.

Authors:  Wenhong Ma; Zhongping Zhan; Xiaoyan Liang; Jianhui Chen; Xingfang Huang; Caiyun Liao
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  "Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Marker for Ovarian Response in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for IVF Patients": A First Pilot Study in the Indian Population.

Authors:  Neeta Singh; Ekta Malik; Ayan Banerjee; Kunzang Chosdol; V Sreenivas; Suneeta Mittal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-02-22

6.  Do estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms have any impact on the outcome in an ART program?

Authors:  Elli Anagnostou; Fotodotis Malamas; Despina Mavrogianni; Vasiliki Dinopoulou; Peter Drakakis; Konstantinos Kallianidis; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Response to controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte quality in women with myotonic dystrophy type I.

Authors:  Banchhita Sahu; Ozkan Ozturk; Nandita Deo; Karen Fordham; Massimo Ranierri; Paul Serhal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Zhaolian Wei; Xianxia Cheng; Huirong Li; Yunxia Cao; Lin Cong; Ping Zhou; Jun Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Impact of female age and male infertility on ovarian reserve markers to predict outcome of assisted reproduction technology cycles.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Lee; Chung-Hsien Liu; Chun-Chia Huang; Kung-Chen Hsieh; Pi-Mei Lin; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Comparison of follicular fluid and serum levels of Inhibin A and Inhibin B with calculated indices used as predictive markers of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in IVF patients.

Authors:  Jiri Moos; Karel Rezabek; Vanda Filova; Martina Moosova; Jana Pavelkova; Jana Peknicova
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.