Literature DB >> 35905108

Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for predicting surgery-related acute kidney injury in non-cardiac surgery patients under general anaesthesia: A retrospective cohort study.

Yongzhong Tang1, Linchong Chen1, Bo Li2, Lin Yang3, Wen Ouyang1, Dan Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the incidence of surgery-related acute kidney injury (AKI) in non-cardiac surgery patients under general anaesthesia.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, 5057 patients from Third Xiangya hospital from January 2012 to December 2016 and 1686 patients from Second Xiangya hospital from January 2016 to December 2016 for non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia were included. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve constructed by NLR for postoperative AKI, the cut-off point was obtained as the basis for grouping low or high NLR. The baseline characteristics of two sets were compared with each other. A multi-factor model was constructed by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method with the training set, and verified by outside validation set.
RESULTS: 243 patients (3.604%) developed postoperative AKI. The ROC curve showed that the AUC of the NLR for predicting postoperative AKI in non-cardiac surgery was 0.743 (95% CI, 0.717-0.769), and the cut-off value was 3.555 (sensitivity, 86.4%; specificity 51.9%). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of training set and validation set. The AUC in the training set was 0.817 (95% CI, 0.784-0.850), and the AUC in the validation set was 0.804 (95% CI, 0.749-0.858), the AUC deviation was 0.012 (P > 0.05) from validation set, and the likelihood ratio test showed P < 0.05.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that preoperative high NLR (NLR≥3.555) was an independent risk factor associated with postoperative AKI (OR, 2.410; 95% CI, 1.371-4.335) in patients for non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35905108      PMCID: PMC9337669          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Acute renal injury (AKI) is a serious postoperative complication with high incidence rate. The incidence of postoperative AKI has been found to range from 3–43% [1-4], inspite that measures had been taken to protect renal function postoperatively. AKI is also a predictor of long-term prognosis, including chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and cardiovascular disease (heart failure, myocardial infarction), as well as mortality [5, 6]. Currently, markers widely used to evaluate acute renal injury (such as BUN, SCr, and urine volume, etc.) are not sensitive enough to detect early mild impairment of renal function [7]. Other indicators such as Cystatin (CysC), urinary microalbumin (mALB), and 1-microglobulin (1-mg), although more sensitive, are also indicators after renal injury and expensive to carry out in clinical practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore a cheap、simple and predictive index of postoperative acute renal injury, so as to achieve early prevention, early treatment, and protect the renal function to the maximum extent. Inflammation is one of the major pathogenic mechanism for AKI [8]. The proportion of neutrophils to lymphocytes, i.e., the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), before surgery is an effective index reflecting inflammation and oxidative stress. A large number of studies have shown that the NLR is closely related to the prognosis of patients with tumors [9, 10], and cardiovascular disease [11-13] At present, studies have been conducted on NLR and specific high-risk populations of AKI, such as emergency surgery [14], burn surgery [15], cardiac surgery [16], and sepsis patients [17]. However, the relationship between the preoperative NLR and AKI after non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia has been barely studied. This retrospective study aimed to assess the significance of the preoperative NLR in predicting acute renal injury in patients for non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, and to obtain a cut-off value of preoperative NLR to distinguish high-risk population and improve the sensitivity of diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Patients

This retrospective study was performed at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2012 to December 2016 (n = 5057) and the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South university from January 2016 to December 2016 (n = 1686). The inclusion criteria were patients aged≥18 years who underwent non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia. Patients with a preoperative infection or chronic kidney disease were excluded, along with those admitted for urinary surgery and those with missing data. This study was in line with the guidelines of the Strengthening of Observational Epidemiological Studies (STROBE) statement, and approved by the ethics committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (2017-S214). Because of observational nature of the study, informed consent was waived by the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

Data collection

The following information was collected: 1. Epidemiological data including age and gender; 2. Preoperative laboratory data including absolute value or percentage of neutrophil and lymphocyte, haemoglobin, platelet distribution width, uric acid, albumin, total bilirubin, creatinine and eGFR calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [18]. 3. Comorbidities of all the patients (diabetes, coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and hypertension). 4. Intraoperative data including the operation type (emergency, or laparoscopic), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, operative time, total amount of fluids infusion and blood loss during operation. 5. Postoperative outcomes such as admission to ICU and estimated 10-year survival rate (calculated with Charlson comorbidity index).

Definitions

Postoperative AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 creatinine criteria [19], as one of the following: an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48h or a ≥1.5-times increase in serum creatinine from baseline within 7 postoperative days. The baseline serum creatinine level was calculated using the lowest level at preoperative day 7. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. Surgical grade was classified using the surgical classification catalog constituted by the Chinese Ministry of Health, published in 2018.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS (version 22.0) and R (version 2.12.0) software were used for the statistical analysis. The data are presented as the Median (M) and interquartile range (IQR). Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare non-normal distribution continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used to compare the composition ratio of classified data. All p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. First, the ROC curve of preoperative NLR was built by R software and the best cut-off value was calculated. Taking the data from The Third Xiangya Hospital as the training set, the variables P < 0.1 and some clinical meaningful variables were included in the multi-variable model, and the simplified model was obtained by using the LASSO regression. The data from The Second Xiangya Hospital were taken as the validation set. The ROC curve was drawn to verify that the high preoperative NLR was an associated independent risk factor. Finally, likelihood ratio test was conducted, and the importance of high preoperative NLR was verified again

Results

In total, 6743 patients were included, of whom 243 (3.604%) developed postoperative AKI. The ROC curve showed that the AUC of the NLR for predicting postoperative AKI in non-cardiac surgery was 0.743 (95% CI, 0.717–0.769; p < 0.01), and the cut-off value was 3.555 (sensitivity 86.4%; specificity 51.9%). It was suggested that preoperative NLR≥3.555 might be associated with the increasing risk of postoperative AKI (Fig 1).
Fig 1

ROC curve analysis of preoperative Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for the occurrence postoperative AKI.

5057 patients from Xiangya Third Hospital were taken as the training set, and 1686 patients from Xiangya Second Hospital for the validation set. AKI was developed in 176 (3.5%) and 67 patients (4%) (Table 1), in the training set and the verification set, respectively. The baseline features of low and high NLR group were compared in Table 1. The LASSO regression was used to reduce the number of the variables. Model I was built with the following risk factors: preoperative high NLR, RBC, lymphocyte absolute value, neutrophil absolute value, platelet distribution width, albumin, total bilirubin, estimated 10-year survival rate, emergency, amount of blood loss, and ASA III or IV. The results showed that red blood cells, the absolute value of lymphocytes, albumin, and estimated 10 survival rate played a protective role. While preoperative high NLR was an independent risk factor associated with AKI after non-cardiac surgery (OR, 2.410; 95% CI: 1.371–4.335) (Table 2).
Table 1

Variables in training set and validation set.

Training setValidation set
Variable P Low NLR (N = 2556)High NLR (N = 2501)Total (N = 5057) P Low NLR (N = 849)High NLR (N = 837)Total (N = 1686)
Postoperative AKI, n(%) 024(0.9)152(6.1)176(3.5)09(1.1)58(6.9)67(4.0)
Male, n(%) 01136(44.4)1382(55.3)2518(49.8)0388(45.7)462(55.2)850(50.4)
Age, M (IQR) 0.24551(44,61)52(43,62)52(43,62)0.30451(43,61)52(43,62)51(43,61)
Hypertension, n(%) 0.3681062(41.5)1007(40.3)2069(40.9)0.219372(43.8)341(40.7)713(42.3)
CHD, n(%) 0135(5.3)220(8.8)355(7.0)0.02342(4.9)65(7.8)107(6.3)
DM, n(%) 0.023391(15.3)443(17.7)834(16.5)0.181143(16.8)163(19.5)306(18.1)
Peripheral vascular disease, n(%) 0.738241(9.4)228(9.1)469(9.3)0.80981(9.5)76(9.1)157(9.3)
ASA grade, n(%) 00
    I、II1904(74.5)1394(55.7)3298(65.2)641(75.5)441(52.7)1082(64.2)
    III614(24.0)915(36.6)1529(30.2)198(23.3)329(39.3)527(31.3)
    IV38(1.5)192(7.7)230(4.5)10(1.2)67(8.0)77(4.6)
Estimated 10-year survival rate, M (IQR) 0.0010.96(0.90,0.98)0.96(0.78,0.98)0.96(0.90,0.98)0.010.96(0.90,0.98)0.96(0.78,0.98)0.96(0.90,0.98)
WBC, M (IQR) 06.0(5.0,7.2)10.8(8.0,14.5)7.5(5.7,11.0)06.1(5.0,7.3)10.7(8.2,14.3)7.6(5.7,11.0)
RBC, M (IQR) 04.3(4.0,4.7)4.0(3.5,4.5)4.2(3.7,4.6)04.3(4.0,4.7)4.0(3.5,4.6)4.2(3.8,4.7)
Hb, M (IQR) 0128(116,139)119(101,133)124(109,137)0128(115,140)119(101,136)125(108,138)
HCT, M (IQR) 039.2(35.8,42.3)36.3(31.0,40.5)37.9(33.5,41.6)039.3(35.4,42.6)36.1(31.5,41.4)37.9(33.4,42.0)
PDW, M (IQR) 014.3(12.4,16.0)14.8(12.6,16.2)14.6(12.5,16.1)0.02714.3(12.5,16.1)14.7(12.7,16.2)14.5(12.6,16.1)
Neutrophils, M (IQR) 03.5(2.8,4.4)9.1(6.4,12.6)5.1(3.4,9.2)03.5(2.8,4.5)8.9(6.5,12.5)5.2(3.5,8.9)
Percentage of neutrophils, M (IQR) 060.1(53.8,65.1)84.1(77.1,89.6)70.5(59.9,84.0)060.0(54.1,65.6)84.2(77.3,90.1)70.6(59.8,84.1)
Lymphocyte, M (IQR) 01.8(1.5,2.2)1.0(0.7,1.4)1.4(1.0,1.9)01.8(1.5,2.2)1.0(0.7,1.3)1.4(0.9,1.9)
Percentage of lymphocytes, M (IQR) 029.8(24.8,35.3)9.4(5.7,14.5)20.1(9.5,29.9)029.5(25.0,35.1)9.5(5.6,14.8)20.3(9.5,29.8)
TBIL, M (IQR) 013.2(10.0,17.6)15.0(10.7,21.9)13.9(10.3,19.5)013.3(10.0,17.7)14.9(11.0,21.6)14.2(10.5,19.4)
DBIL, M (IQR) 04.3(3.1,6.0)5.6(3.8,8.7)4.8(3.4,7.2)04.3(3.1,6.0)5.5(3.7,8.6)4.9(3.3,7.2)
Albumin, M (IQR) 041.2(38.4,44.2)37.5(32.2,42.0)39.8(35.6,43.4)041.5(38.5,44.4)37.9(32.6,41.9)40.0(35.8,43.4)
Globulin, M (IQR) 026.2(23.5,29.1)25.0(21.8,28.4)25.7(22.7,28.8)026.1(23.4,29.0)25.2(22.0,28.6)25.7(22.7,28.8)
A/G, M (IQR) 01.6(1.4,1.8)1.5(1.3,1.7)1.5(1.3,1.8)01.6(1.4,1.8)1.5(1.3,1.7)1.5(1.3,1.7)
Urea, M (IQR) 0.024.5(3.5,5.5)4.4(3.2,5.8)4.4(3.4,5.6)0.4974.5(3.6,5.6)4.5(3.3,5.9)4.5(3.5,5.7)
Uric acid, M (IQR) 0265(209,324)218(154,290)245(183,309)0265(211,334)222(158,295)247(183,316)
Creatinine, M (IQR) 0.00663(54,74)62(51,75)63(53,75)0.10464(54,76)63(52,75)64(53,76)
eGFR, M (IQR) 0103.4(92.7,112.6)105(93.2,115.7)104.1(92.9,114.1)0.034102.9(91.6,112.6)104.9(92.3,114.9)103.9(91.8,113.8)
Emergence, n(%) 0160(6.3)786(31.4)946(18.7)048(5.7)260(31.1)308(18.3)
Surgical grading, n(%) 0.0590.95
    11004(39.3)902(36.1)1906(37.7)317(37.3)307(36.7)624(37.0)
    21474(57.7)1515(60.6)2989(59.1)507(59.7)504(60.2)1011(60.0)
    378(3.1)84(3.4)162(3.2)25(2.9)26(3.1)51(3.0)
Laparoscope, n(%) 0810(31.7)486(19.4)1296(25.6)0261(30.7)177(21.1)438(26.0)
Operative time, M (IQR) 02.6(1.6,3.7)2.7(1.8,3.9)2.7(1.7,3.8)0.082.7(1.7,3.8)2.7(1.9,3.8)2.7(1.8,3.8)
Amount of fluid infusion, M (IQR) 025(16,36)26(17,36)26(16,36)0.2126(16,36)26(17,36)26(16,36)
Amount of blood loss, M (IQR) 02.0(0.5,4.0)3.0 (1.0,6.0)2.0(1.0,5.0)02.0(0.8,4.0)2.5(1.0,5.0)2.0(1.0,5.0)
Admission to ICU, n(%) 058(2.3)365(14.6)423(8.4)09(1.1)144(17.2)153(9.1)

Data are shown as mean ± SD or number (%), as appropriate. P = 0 means P<0.001, a statistically significant difference. AKI, acute kidney injury; Age(years old); CHD, coronary heart disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; WBC, White Blood cell(109/L); RBC, red blood cell(1012/L); Hb, hemoglobin(g/L); Hct, hematocrit(%); PDW, platelet distribution width(fL); Neutrophils(109/L); Lymphocyte(109/L); percentage(%);TBIL, total bilirubin(μmol/L); DBIL, Direct Bilirubin(μmol/L); albumin, globulin(g/L); urea, creatinine, uric acid(μmol/L); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate(ml/min/1.73m2); operative time(hours), intraoperative fluid infusion and blood loss(102ml).

Table 2

The result from the lasso regression.

Risk factor coefficient SDStatistic P OR 2.5%CI97.5%CI
intercept--3.0820.792-3.89300.0460.010.216
X1Preoperative high NLR0.880.2933.0050.0032.411.3714.335
X2RBC-0.2720.116-2.3440.0190.7620.6060.956
X3Lymphocyte absolute value-0.180.152-1.1870.2350.8350.6131.11
X4Neutrophil absolute value0.0310.0161.9280.0541.0310.9991.063
X5Platelet distribution width0.0830.0273.030.0021.0861.0281.145
X6Albumin-0.0230.013-1.8330.0670.9770.9541.002
X7TBIL0.0040.0022.6920.0071.0041.0011.007
X8Estimated 10-year survival rate-1.210.388-3.1190.0020.2980.1420.652
X9Emergency0.4850.1812.6810.0071.6241.1372.312
X10Amount of Blood loss0.0260.0073.4610.0011.0261.0111.041
X11ASA III0.750.1943.85702.1161.453.113
ASA IV1.1660.2724.29403.211.8735.443

P = 0 means P<0.001, a statistically significant difference. Abbreviation: OR (odds ratio), CI (confidence interval). RBC (red blood cell) (1012/L), absolute values of lymphocytes and neutrophils (109/L), Platelet distribution width (fL), albumin (g/L), TBIL (total bilirubin) (μmol/L), blood loss (102ml).

Data are shown as mean ± SD or number (%), as appropriate. P = 0 means P<0.001, a statistically significant difference. AKI, acute kidney injury; Age(years old); CHD, coronary heart disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; WBC, White Blood cell(109/L); RBC, red blood cell(1012/L); Hb, hemoglobin(g/L); Hct, hematocrit(%); PDW, platelet distribution width(fL); Neutrophils(109/L); Lymphocyte(109/L); percentage(%);TBIL, total bilirubin(μmol/L); DBIL, Direct Bilirubin(μmol/L); albumin, globulin(g/L); urea, creatinine, uric acid(μmol/L); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate(ml/min/1.73m2); operative time(hours), intraoperative fluid infusion and blood loss(102ml). P = 0 means P<0.001, a statistically significant difference. Abbreviation: OR (odds ratio), CI (confidence interval). RBC (red blood cell) (1012/L), absolute values of lymphocytes and neutrophils (109/L), Platelet distribution width (fL), albumin (g/L), TBIL (total bilirubin) (μmol/L), blood loss (102ml). The AUC in the training set was 0.817 (95% CI: 0.784–0.85), while the validation set was 0.804 (95% CI: 0.749–0.85), the AUC deviation was 0.012 (P = 0.68 > 0.05) (Fig 2). The validation showed that preoperative high NLR was still an independent risk factor associated with postoperative AKI.
Fig 2

Relationships between the ROC of training set and validation set.

Moreover, the likelihood ratio test is used to verify the established model. Model 1 was established as above, Model II was built the same as Model I but the risk factor preoperative high NLR was removed. The likelihood ratio test showed Model I was significant different with Model II (P < 0.05). This suggest that preoperative high NLR might be of important value in predicting AKI occurrence after non-cardiac surgery.

Discussion

In our study, the NLR measured on admission, was associated with the development of postoperative AKI in patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. The cut-off value of the NLR was 3.55, the sensitivity of identifying AKI was 86.4%, and the specificity was 51.9%. Preoperative high NLR was an independent risk factor associated with AKI after non-cardiac surgery (OR, 2.410; 95% CI: 1.371–4.335). Inflammation plays an important role in the development of AKI [20]. Some inflammatory marker can predict AKI, such as IL-18 [21], IL-10 [22], IL-6 [22] and α-1 microglobulin [23]. However, these indicators are not carried out as routine examinations in various hospitals; on the other hand, some are only measured postoperatively related to postoperative AKI, which cannot achieve an early warning, so as to carry out intervention in the perioperative period. The NLR which can be calculated using data from preoperative blood routine test, is a reliable marker for the systemic inflammatory response. Because the number of neutrophils reflects inflammation in the body, and the number of lymphocytes represents the body’s response to oxidative stress [24]. In the inflammatory response, lymphocytes can be apoptotic, while neutrophils proliferate. Therefore, to a certain extent, the NLR indicates the balance of the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory reactions. A large number of studies have reported that high NLR is closely related to the development and prognosis of various diseases, such as coronary artery disease, cancer and other diseases [25-27]. In the field of nephorology, previous studies have found that increased preoperative NLR was associated with AKI in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery and burn surgery [15, 28, 29], Bu et al. [17] also reported that the initial NLR measured at ICU admission was associated with the development of AKI in patients with sepsis and septic shock. The patients mentioned above are at high risk for postoperative AKI, however, our study included a wider range of patients. Unlike these studies, Yu and his colleagues [30] focused on the postoperative NLR and found that NLR within 24 h after surgery was significantly correlated with major postoperative complications in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. By using the optimal cut-off value of preoperative NLR obtained in our study, the rate of missed diagnosis is lower, which enables clinicians to be more alert to the occurrence of postoperative AKI in patients, strengthening preoperative prevention and management (e.g., avoid the use of nephrotoxic drugs or angiography) of postoperative renal function problems. The association of preoperative high NLR with postoperative AKI may be the result of neutrophil activation prior to surgery. This, may furtherly lead to endothelial injury and activation of coagulation pathway after surgery, which can stimulate the body to produce inflammatory mediators, induce systemic inflammatory response, and lead to postoperative AKI. Our study focused on the effect of preoperative basic state of patients on postoperative AKI, but also included intraoperative patient conditions, such as hemodynamic issues. There were significant differences in many indicators between the high and low NLR groups, and the factor of P < 0.1 was included to correct these indicators. The method of LASSO regression, which is a compression estimation method based on reducing variable set, is adopted to obtain a concise and effective model. A multi-factor regression model (AUC = 0.817) was constructed after excluding the interference of age, hypertension, surgical type and other factors. Moreover, through the likelihood ratio validation, it was proved again that preoperative high NLR was an independent risk factor for AKI after non-cardiac surgery, and that preoperative high NLR might have important value in predicting the occurrence of AKI after non-cardiac surgery.

Limitation

Limitations of this study should also be acknowledged. First, we used the discharge diagnosis to identify diseases, which may not cover all types of CKD patients, including those with minor renal impairment defined by a lower creatinine level. Second, some valuable variables that may be prognostic factors were not evaluated in this study, such as surgical information (operative time and urine output) and inflammatory markers other than the NLR (e.g., cytokines). In view of the above limitations, further research is necessary.

Conclusion

The present study showed that preoperative high NLR (NLR ≥3.555) was an independent risk factor for postoperative AKI in patients for non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia (OR, 2.410; 95% CI, 1.371–4.335). As a simple and accessible indicator, preoperative NLR is valuable in differentiating high-risk groups for postoperative AKI. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. 8 Mar 2022
PONE-D-21-35925
Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Surgery-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients under General Anaesthesia: A retrospective cohort study
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Li, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 22 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino, M.D., Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Thanks to the authors for their efforts and for touching on an important issue in the practice of nephrology. Although it is a retrospective study, it consolidates the increasing evidence of the utility of NLR in predicting AKI. I have the following points: 1. Can the authors elaborate more on the pre-op creatinine values? 2. What do you think is the reason for the low specificity of 51.9%? 3. It would be better to mention data about the utility in Cardiovascular procedures, like CABG or repair of AA or in the HBP surgeries. 4. Authors should mention data, if any, about the use of NLR in the post-op setting to compare with their results. 4. It would be better to refer to the following paper, Chinese; with Meta-Analysis data: Lu Z, Wang L, Jia L, Wei F, Jiang A. [A Meta-analysis of the predictive effect of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on acute kidney injury]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):311-317. Chinese. DOI: 10.3760/CMA.j.cn121430-20201215-00755. PMID: 33834972. 5. The meta-analysis mentioned above has provided data about ethnic differences in NLR values (Asia vs. Eurasia). The authors can compare their cohort with the other groups Reviewer #2: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in various diseases had been discussed in detail in the past years. However, this important work is the first to suggest that it's preoperative value may predict postoperative AKI in non-cardiac surgery. There are two papers that may increase the value of "Discussion" if mentioned. The work of Yu Y, et al. described similar results, but the NLR was measured postoperatively in the first 24 hours. They studied a much smaller number of patients. Yu Y, Cui WH, Cheng C, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Han RQ. Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and major postoperative complications after carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Clin Cases. 2021 Dec 16;9(35):10816-10827. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10816. PMID: 35047593; PMCID: PMC8678856. The paper of Guangqing Z, et al. found the same result but in cardiac surgery. This recent paper probably was not published before the preparation of this paper. Guangqing Z, Liwei C, Fei L, Jianshe Z, Guang Z, Yan Z, Jianjun C, Ming T, Hao C, Wei L. Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on acute kidney injury after on-pump coronary artery bypass: a retrospective, single-center study. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb 1. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01772-z. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35103920. A few spelling mistakes: line 94: Diabetes; line 136: Low; line 142: Preoperative do not need capital letter. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
11 Apr 2022 Re. MS # PONE-D-21-35925 Dear Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino: We are submitting a revision of our manuscript entitled “Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Surgery-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients under General Anaesthesia: A retrospective cohort study” for possible publication in PLOS ONE. We thank the Editor and Reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive comments on the initial submission. In response to the comments, we have addressed their critiques point-by-point as detailed below. Reviewer #1: Thanks to the authors for their efforts and for touching on an important issue in the practice of nephrology. Although it is a retrospective study, it consolidates the increasing evidence of the utility of NLR in predicting AKI. A: We thank the Reviewer for the comments and have addressed the Reviewer’s other concerns below. Q1: Can the authors elaborate more on the pre-op creatinine values? A: The baseline serum creatinine level was calculated using the lowest level at preoperative day 7 and detected by the L-type creatinine M (Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Japan). Q2. What do you think is the reason for the low specificity of 51.9%? A: The cut-off value of NLR differs in different patients (PMID: 33834972), the specificity and sensitivity also varies. The possible reason of the low specificity in our study might be the cut-off value and the type of surgery. Q3. It would be better to mention data about the utility in Cardiovascular procedures, like CABG or repair of AA or in the HBP surgeries. A: Thanks for your suggestion! We added the results of the NLR in cardiovascular surgery in our manuscript (Page 10, Main Document - marked copy). Q4. Authors should mention data, if any, about the use of NLR in the post-op setting to compare with their results. A: Thanks for your advice! We mentioned the study of postoperative NLR in the revised manuscript (Page 10, Main Document - marked copy). Q5. It would be better to refer to the following paper, Chinese; with Meta-Analysis data: Lu Z, Wang L, Jia L, Wei F, Jiang A. [A Meta-analysis of the predictive effect of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on acute kidney injury]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):311-317. Chinese. DOI: 10.3760/CMA.j.cn121430-20201215-00755. PMID: 33834972. A: Thanks for your suggestion! We added this reference in our manuscript (Page 10, Main Document - marked copy). Q6. The meta-analysis mentioned above has provided data about ethnic differences in NLR values (Asia vs. Eurasia). The authors can compare their cohort with the other groups. A: The meta-analysis showed that increased NLR had predictive value for the occurrence of AKI in patients from Southeast Asia (MD = 4.04, 95%CI was 1.09-6.99, P = 0.007) and Eurasia (MD = 2.51, 95%CI was 1.12-3.90, P = 0.0004). The patients in our study were all from China, and the results were similar with the meta-analysis. Reviewer #2: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in various diseases had been discussed in detail in the past years. However, this important work is the first to suggest that it's preoperative value may predict postoperative AKI in non-cardiac surgery. A: We thank the Reviewer for the comments and have addressed the Reviewer’s other concerns below. There are two papers that may increase the value of "Discussion" if mentioned. The work of Yu Y, et al. described similar results, but the NLR was measured postoperatively in the first 24 hours. They studied a much smaller number of patients. Yu Y, Cui WH, Cheng C, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Han RQ. Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and major postoperative complications after carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Clin Cases. 2021 Dec 16;9(35):10816-10827. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.10816. PMID: 35047593; PMCID: PMC8678856. The paper of Guangqing Z, et al. found the same result but in cardiac surgery. This recent paper probably was not published before the preparation of this paper. Guangqing Z, Liwei C, Fei L, Jianshe Z, Guang Z, Yan Z, Jianjun C, Ming T, Hao C, Wei L. Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on acute kidney injury after on-pump coronary artery bypass: a retrospective, single-center study. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb 1. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01772-z. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35103920. A: Thanks for your suggestion! We added these two papers in our Discussion section (Page 10, Main Document - marked copy). A few spelling mistakes: line 94: Diabetes; line 136: Low; line 142: Preoperative do not need capital letter. A: We are sorry about the mistake! We corrected these spelling mistakes in the revised version (Page 6, 8, Main Document - marked copy) Once again, we thank the Editor and Reviewers for critically reviewing this study and for your constructive comments. We also make minor changes to our funding information in our revised manuscript. We look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, Dan Li Department of Anesthesiology The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan,410013, China Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 3 Jun 2022 Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Surgery-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients under General Anaesthesia: A retrospective cohort study PONE-D-21-35925R1 Dear Dr. Li, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino, M.D., Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #2: Good revision. All comments have been addressed. The suggested literature was incorporeted and the spelling mistakes corrected. ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #2: No ********** 21 Jul 2022 PONE-D-21-35925R1 Preoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting Surgery-Related Acute Kidney Injury in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients under General Anaesthesia: A retrospective cohort study Dear Dr. Li: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Professor Giuseppe Filiberto Serraino Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  30 in total

1.  KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Arif Khwaja
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2012-08-07

2.  Single emergency room measurement of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio for early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Authors:  Mohsen Abu Alfeilat; Itzchak Slotki; Linda Shavit
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio independently predicts cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yalcin Solak; Mahmut Ilker Yilmaz; Alper Sonmez; Mutlu Saglam; Erdinc Cakir; Hilmi Umut Unal; Mahmut Gok; Kayser Caglar; Yusuf Oguz; Mujdat Yenicesu; Murat Karaman; Seyit Ahmet Ay; Abduzhappar Gaipov; Suleyman Turk; Abdulgaffar Vural; Juan J Carrero
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.801

4.  Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio combination can predict prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Gökhan Çiçek; Sadık Kadri Açıkgoz; Mehmet Bozbay; Servet Altay; Murat Uğur; Mahmut Uluganyan; Huseyin Uyarel
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Evaluation of Novel Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury in Asphyxiated Full-Term Newborns: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Bili Zhang; Dan Wang; Wujuan Shi; Anjie Zheng
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 6.  Acute kidney injury and prognosis after cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  John W Pickering; Matthew T James; Suetonia C Palmer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cardiovascular diseases: a review.

Authors:  Tariq Bhat; Sumaya Teli; Jharendra Rijal; Hilal Bhat; Muhammad Raza; Georges Khoueiry; Mustafain Meghani; Muhammad Akhtar; Thomas Costantino
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2013-01

Review 8.  Inflammation in Renal Diseases: New and Old Players.

Authors:  Vinicius Andrade-Oliveira; Orestes Foresto-Neto; Ingrid Kazue Mizuno Watanabe; Roberto Zatz; Niels Olsen Saraiva Câmara
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on acute kidney injury after on-pump coronary artery bypass: a retrospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Zhang Guangqing; Cheng Liwei; Ling Fei; Zheng Jianshe; Zeng Guang; Zhu Yan; Cao Jianjun; Tian Ming; Chen Hao; Liu Wei
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-02-01

10.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.