Lydia L Chevalier1,2, Jaime E Blackmon1, Sharon L Bober1,2, Anthony Roman1,3, Grace Chang2,4, Christopher J Recklitis5,6. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA. 4. VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton, MA, USA. 5. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Christopher_Recklitis@dfci.harvard.edu. 6. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Christopher_Recklitis@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for assessing potential late effects experienced by young adult cancer survivors (YACS), but stigma and social desirability bias may limit their effectiveness for assessing sensitive topics (e.g., suicidal ideation, sexual health). This study compared two methods of item administration to determine the optimal method for obtaining sensitive information in YACS. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four YACS (ages 18-40) were randomized to complete measures of suicidal ideation and sexual health (i.e., sensitive items) by paper survey or by telephone automated computer assisted structured interview (TACASI). Participants also provided information on acceptability of administration mode and sensitive items. RESULTS: The proportion of participants reporting symptoms did not significantly vary between paper and TACASI administration: respectively, 10% vs. 12% reported suicidal ideation and 55% vs. 58% reported sexual health concerns. The majority (≥ 78%) of participants reported feeling comfortable answering sensitive items on paper and TACASI and there were no significant differences in acceptability based on administration mode. Although participants endorsing sensitive symptoms were significantly more likely to feel upset answering sensitive items, the majority (93%) of participants experiencing symptoms still felt they were important to ask. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their potentially sensitive nature, questions about suicidal ideation and sexual health were highly acceptable to YACS across administration modes. Moreover, YACS almost universally endorse the importance of providers asking about these topics. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings should bolster provider confidence that screening for suicidal ideation and sexual health concerns can and should be integrated into clinical care for YACS using paper or technology-assisted methods.
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for assessing potential late effects experienced by young adult cancer survivors (YACS), but stigma and social desirability bias may limit their effectiveness for assessing sensitive topics (e.g., suicidal ideation, sexual health). This study compared two methods of item administration to determine the optimal method for obtaining sensitive information in YACS. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four YACS (ages 18-40) were randomized to complete measures of suicidal ideation and sexual health (i.e., sensitive items) by paper survey or by telephone automated computer assisted structured interview (TACASI). Participants also provided information on acceptability of administration mode and sensitive items. RESULTS: The proportion of participants reporting symptoms did not significantly vary between paper and TACASI administration: respectively, 10% vs. 12% reported suicidal ideation and 55% vs. 58% reported sexual health concerns. The majority (≥ 78%) of participants reported feeling comfortable answering sensitive items on paper and TACASI and there were no significant differences in acceptability based on administration mode. Although participants endorsing sensitive symptoms were significantly more likely to feel upset answering sensitive items, the majority (93%) of participants experiencing symptoms still felt they were important to ask. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their potentially sensitive nature, questions about suicidal ideation and sexual health were highly acceptable to YACS across administration modes. Moreover, YACS almost universally endorse the importance of providers asking about these topics. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Findings should bolster provider confidence that screening for suicidal ideation and sexual health concerns can and should be integrated into clinical care for YACS using paper or technology-assisted methods.