Literature DB >> 15453008

Factors contributing to failed trials of new agents: can technology prevent some problems?

John H Greist1, James C Mundt, Kenneth Kobak.   

Abstract

For psychiatry to contribute to the development of the next generation of antidepressant pharmacotherapies, effective use of clinical trial methods is as critical as innovation in neurochemical research. Results from clinical trials on the efficacy of a new drug can be obscured by methodological problems. Accurate diagnosis and precise measurement of the clinical symptoms during conduct of the clinical trials are crucial to obtaining interpretable outcomes. As tools that reliably diagnose disorders and assess symptoms become available, computer administration of rating instruments may improve the accuracy of clinical trial results. This article describes methodological factors that can confound study outcomes and discusses the potential for interactive voice response (IVR) technology to address some of these problems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15453008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  10 in total

1.  New insights into the efficacy of naltrexone based on trajectory-based reanalyses of two negative clinical trials.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Ran Wu; Brian Pittman; Joyce Cramer; Robert A Rosenheck; Stephanie S O'malley; John H Krystal
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Improving study design for antidepressant effectiveness assessment.

Authors:  Florian Naudet; Bruno Millet; Jean Michel Reymann; Bruno Falissard
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Interactive voice response version of the late-life function and disability instrument.

Authors:  Feng-Hang Chang; Nancy K Latham; Robert H Friedman; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Screening for postpartum depression among low-income mothers using an interactive voice response system.

Authors:  Helen G Kim; Joni Geppert; Tu Quan; Yiscah Bracha; Virginia Lupo; Diana B Cutts
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-05

5.  Anchoring perceptions of clinical change on accurate recollection of the past: memory enhanced retrospective evaluation of treatment (MERET).

Authors:  James C Mundt; David J Debrota; John H Greist
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-03

6.  Evaluating sensitive symptoms in young adult cancer survivors: acceptability of suicidal ideation and sexual health items across administration modes.

Authors:  Lydia L Chevalier; Jaime E Blackmon; Sharon L Bober; Anthony Roman; Grace Chang; Christopher J Recklitis
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Expectancy and the Treatment of Depression: A Review of Experimental Methodology and Effects on Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Tor D Wager; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rev       Date:  2010-02-01

8.  What happens after diagnosis? Understanding the experiences of patients with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Judith G Proudfoot; Gordon B Parker; Megan Benoit; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Aimee Gayed
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Evaluation of structural models to describe the effect of placebo upon the time course of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth Y Shang; Megan A Gibbs; Jaren W Landen; Michael Krams; Tanya Russell; Nicholas G Denman; Diane R Mould
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 10.  Placebo Responses and Placebo Effects in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Authors:  Paul Enck; Sibylle Klosterhalfen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.