Literature DB >> 35903656

Perioperative Complication Profile of Skull Base Meningioma Resection in Older versus Younger Adult Patients.

Colin J Przybylowski1, Kelly A Shaftel1, Benjamin K Hendricks1, Kristina M Chapple1, Shawn M Stevens1, Randall W Porter1, Nader Sanai1, Andrew S Little1, Kaith K Almefty1.   

Abstract

Objectives  To better understand the risk-benefit profile of skull base meningioma resection in older patients, we compared perioperative complications among older and younger patients. Design  Present study is based on retrospective outcomes comparison. Setting  The study was conducted at a single neurosurgery institute at a quaternary center. Participants  All older (age ≥ 65 years) and younger (<65 years) adult patients treated with World Health Organization grade 1 skull base meningiomas (2008-2017). Main Outcome Measures  Perioperative complications and patient functional status are the primary outcomes of this study. Results  The analysis included 287 patients, 102 older and 185 younger, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 72 (5) years and 51 (9) years ( p  < 0.01). Older patients were more likely to have hypertension ( p  < 0.01) and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( p  = 0.01) but other patient and tumor factors did not differ ( p ≥ 0.14). Postoperative medical complications were not significantly different in older versus younger patients (10.8 [11/102] vs. 4.3% [8/185]; p  = 0.06) nor were postoperative surgical complications (13.7 [14/102] vs. 10.8% [20/185]; p  = 0.46). Following anterior skull base meningioma resection, diabetes insipidus (DI) was more common in older versus younger patients (14 [5/37] vs. 2% [1/64]; p  = 0.01). Among older patients, a decreasing preoperative Karnofsky performance status score independently predicted perioperative complications by logistic regression analysis ( p  = 0.02). Permanent neurologic deficits were not significantly different in older versus younger patients (12.7 [13/102] vs. 10.3% [19/185]; p  = 0.52). Conclusion  The overall perioperative complication profile of older and younger patients was similar after skull base meningioma resection. Older patients were more likely to experience DI after anterior skull base meningioma resection. Decreasing functional status in older patients predicted perioperative complications. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elderly; frailty; meningioma; skull base

Year:  2021        PMID: 35903656      PMCID: PMC9324320          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  16 in total

1.  Management of incidental anterior skull base large and giant meningiomas in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yuqian Li; Dan Lu; Dayun Feng; Hongyu Cheng; Qian Huang; Haikang Zhao; Peng Chen; Huaizhou Qin; Qing Cai
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Management of skull based meningiomas in the elderly patient.

Authors:  F Roser; F H Ebner; R Ritz; M Samii; M S Tatagiba; M Nakamura
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: a systematic review of transcranial approaches in the endoscopic era.

Authors:  Mazda K Turel; Georgios Tsermoulas; Abdulmounem Yassin-Kassab; Deven Reddy; Hugo Andrade-Barazarte; Lior Gonen; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Skull base versus non-skull base meningioma surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Torstein R Meling; Michele Da Broi; David Scheie; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Visual outcome of tuberculum sellae meningiomas after extradural optic nerve decompression.

Authors:  Tiit Mathiesen; Lars Kihlström
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Craniotomy for resection of meningioma in the elderly: a multicentre, prospective analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Chirag G Patil; Anand Veeravagu; Shivanand P Lad; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Outcome comparison between younger and older patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resections.

Authors:  Michael Tin-Chung Poon; Linus Hing-Kai Fung; Jenny Kan-Suen Pu; Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Multivariate risk factor analysis and literature review of postoperative deterioration in Karnofsky Performance Scale score in elderly patients with skull base meningioma.

Authors:  Manish Kolakshyapati; Fusao Ikawa; Masaru Abiko; Takafumi Mitsuhara; Yasuyuki Kinoshita; Masaaki Takeda; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 9.  The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.