| Literature DB >> 35903625 |
Kazutoshi Fujioka1, Taher A Salaheldin1, Kavitha Godugu1, Harold V Meyers2, Shaker A Mousa1.
Abstract
Catechin polyphenols are the major bioactive ingredients in green tea with various human health benefits. Extraction of catechins from green tea (GTE) leaves at optimized standard conditions is still a challenging approach. An optimized, rapid, and economic extraction method is industrially needed. We hypothesized that certain extraction techniques in the presence of natural polymers and antioxidants might improve GTE catechin extraction yield and its biological activity. The effect of microwave (30-60 seconds irradiation in a typical kitchen microwave) assisted extraction (MAE) and ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) techniques were evaluated separately and in combination. To study the effect of the extraction solvent, nine edible green solvent combinations were investigated namely water, ascorbic acid, chitosan/ascorbic acid, carboxymethylcellulose /ascorbic acid, methylcellulose /ascorbic acid, chitosan/methylcellulose/ascorbic acid, methylcellulose, chitosan/acetic acid, and ethanol. The amounts of extracted catechins from green tea leaves were quantified with HPLC-UV. Data showed that the use of MAE & UAE technique was the optimal in producing a higher extraction yield of catechins. Chitosan/ascorbic acid was the optimized solvent with high extraction efficiencies of catechins. Studies in high fat diet fed animals demonstrated significant reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-C by GTE after 3 weeks of oral daily administration. In conclusion, efficient extraction, and stabilization of catechins from green tea leaves demonstrated a significant lowering of high fat diet-mediated elevation in blood cholesterol and LDL-C levels.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; catechins; chitosan; dyslipidemia; edible solvent; extraction; green tea; hypercholesterolemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35903625 PMCID: PMC9328406 DOI: 10.26502/fjppr.053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Pharmacol Res ISSN: 2578-1553
Figure 1:Schematic diagram for extraction protocol for catechins from green tea leaves.
Extraction solvent compositions
| Extraction Protocol | Solvent composition | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Water (control) | Deionized water |
| 2 | Ascorbic acid | 1% Ascorbic acid in water |
| 3 | Chitosan/ascorbic acid | 1% Ascorbic acid and 0.5% Chitosan in water |
| 4 | Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)/ ascorbic acid | 1% Ascorbic acid and 0.5% CMC in water |
| 5 | Methylcellulose (MC)/ascorbic acid | 1% Ascorbic acid and 0.5% MC in water |
| 6 | Chitosan/Methylcellulose/ascorbic acid | 1% Ascorbic acid, 0.25% MC and 0.25% chitosan in water |
| 7 | Methylcellulose (MC) | 0.5% MC in water |
| 8 | Chitosan/acetic acid | 1% Acetic acid and 0.5% chitosan in water |
| 9 | Alcohol extract | 50% Ethanol in water |
Figure 2:HPLC-UV chromatogram of phytochemicals in green tea extract, 1: Garlic acid, 2: Theobromine, 3: Theophylline, 4: EGC, 5: Catechin, 6: Caffeine, 7: EGCG, 8: GCG, 9: EC, 10: ECG
Diet formula
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
| Protein Carbohydrate Fat | 26.2 | 20 | |
|
| 26.3 | 20 | |
| 34.9 | 60 | ||
| 5.24 | 100 | ||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Mesh L-Cystine | |||
| 200 | 800 | ||
| Corn Starch Maltodextrin | 3 | 12 | |
| 10 Sucrose | 0 | 0 | |
| Cellulose, BW200 | 125 | 500 | |
| Soybean Oil Lard* | 68.8 | 275.2 | |
| Mineral Mix, S10026 DiCalcium | 50 | 0 | |
| Phosphate Calcium Carbonate | 25 | 225 | |
| Potassium Citrate, 1 H2O | 245 | 2205 | |
| Vitamin Mix, V10001 Choline | 10 | 0 | |
| Bitartrate | 13 | 0 | |
| FD&C Blue Dye #1 | 5.5 | 0 | |
| 16.5 | 0 | ||
| 10.0 | 40 | ||
| 2 | 0 | ||
| 0.05 | 0 | ||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
Note: Table 2 needs to be fixed to align all of the ingredients with g% and kcal%. Also, i) there are only 12 listed ingredients but 15 rows of values for g%/kcal%. ii) For ‘Protein Carbohydrate Fat’, what are the 4 rows of values? There’s no labels for each set of values. iii) ‘Product #’ header – there are no listed product no.’s, so this header should be changed
HPLC results of green tea extracted bioactive compounds (mg/g green tea extract) by UAE, MAE, and combined MAE and UAE techniques
| UAE | MAE | MAE/ UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 34.84 ± 0.03 | 77.71 ± 0.07 | 142.80 ± 0.13 |
|
| 5.90 ± 0.03 | 7.94 ± 0.04 | 10.54 ± 0.06 |
|
| 2.22 ± 0.14 | 4.12 ± 0.27 | 7.39 ± 0.48 |
|
| 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 0.78 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.74 ± 0.06 |
|
| 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 1.43 ± 0.02 |
|
| 6.35 ± 0.02 | 7.12 ± 0.03 | 8.81 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.036 ± 0.002 | 0.096 ± 0.002 | 0.108 ± 0.002 |
|
| 0.064 ± 0.001 | 0.096 ± 0.005 | 0.378 ± 0.33 |
|
| 0.198 ± 0.009 | 0.336 ± 0.019 | 0.636 ± 0.038 |
Figure 3:Levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C in plasma from a high-fat diet mice fed for 3 weeks and treated with A) GTE administered daily orally with water at 30 mg/kg versus vehicle control given water orally for 3 weeks. Blood was collected at week 3. B) Percentage reduction of plasma total cholesterol. C) LDL-C levels in vehicle control versus GTE treated daily for 3 weeks. D) Percentage reduction of plasma LDL-C was compared with control. Values are presented as mean ± S.D. Statistical analysis conducted using t-test to determine differences among the groups. GTE was statistically significant compared to vehicle control.
HPLC analysis of bioactive compounds in green tea extracts (mg/g green tea extract) Values are presented as mean value ± standard deviation (SD)
| Water | Ascorbic acid | Chitosan/ascorbic acid | CMC / ascorbic acid | MC / ascorbic acid | Chitosan / MC/ascorbic acid | Chitosan / MC | Chitosan / acetic acid | 50 % Alcohol | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGCG | 142.8±0.1 | 99.636±0.09 | 232.24±0.21 | 13.248±0.01 | 25.6434 ± 0.02 | 44.8842 ± 0.04 | 8.96±0.01 | 65.2776 ± 0.06 | 174.8278 ± 0.16 |
| EGC | 10.536 ± 0.09 | 17.25±0.09 | 39.36±0.21 | 1.152±0.00 | 15.3102 ± 0.08 | 14.7224 ± 0.08 | 1.456±0.01 | 0.3304±0.00 | 0.6342±0.00 |
| ECG | 7.392±0.29 | 4.508±0.29 | 14.8±0.95 | 0.576±0.04 | 1.2324±0.08 | 2.0554±0.13 | 0.336±0.02 | 4.2952±0.28 | 11.8384±0.76 |
| Epicatechin | 0.672±0.01 | 0.874±0.01 | 5.2±0.07 | 0.576±0.01 | 0.1422±0.002 | 0.239±0.003 | 0.112±0.002 | 1.7464±0.02 | 1.7516±0.02 |
| Catechin | 0.744±0.07 | 0.368±0.03 | 1.04±0.09 | 0.192±0.01 | 0.3792±0.03 | 0.3346±0.03 | 0.728±0.06 | 0.8024±0.7 | 0.6644±0.06 |
| GCG | 0.696±0.02 | 3.174±0.02 | 9.52±0.02 | 0.288±0.02 | 2.5122±0.02 | 2.3422±0.02 | 0.112±0.02 | 0.0944±0.02 | 0.2416±0.02 |
| Caffeine | 8.808±0.03 | 12.512±0.05 | 47.44±0.19 | 21.504±0.08 | 11.5656 ± 0.04 | 11.0896 ± 0.04 | 13.72±0.05 | 14.7736 ± 0.06 | 17.3046±0.07 |
| Theobromine | 0.096±0.002 | 0.092±0.002 | 0.72±0.001 | 0.096±0.002 | 0.0948±0.002 | 0.0956±0.002 | 0.728±0.001 | 0.1416±0.001 | 0.3926±0.0004 |
| Theophylline | 0.096±0.005 | 0.828±0.077 | 0.4±0.035 | 0.768±0.071 | 0.5688±0.052 | 0 | 0.504±0.045 | 0.0944±0.004 | 0.2114±0.16 |
| Gallic acid | 0.336±0.019 | 0.782±0.048 | 4.24±0.28 | 3.84±0.25 | 0.7584±0.046 | 0.7648±0.047 | 1.064±0.067 | 1.0384±0.065 | 1.2986±0.082 |
Note: adjust Table 4 columns and row sizes to ensure all letters of the chemical names or on the same line