Literature DB >> 35903079

Audiologic Assessment.

Emily A Benson1, Jessica J Messersmith2.   

Abstract

Prior to the fitting of hearing aids, clinicians and patients must discuss the best treatment options for the physical and audiologic needs of the patients. To be able to confidently make these decisions, the clinician should complete a medical and audiological case history. Additionally, clinicians need accurate results from a comprehensive audiologic evaluation. The evaluation should include the following: pure-tone testing, word recognition testing, speech-in-noise testing, and loudness discomfort level measures. This article will outline the process and procedures for acquiring this information in line with the Audiology Practice Standards Organization (APSO) Guidelines for Adult Hearing Aid Fittings Standards 1 and 4. This article will also discuss how results can affect decision-making during the hearing aid selection and fitting process. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audiologic testing; hearing; hearing aids

Year:  2022        PMID: 35903079      PMCID: PMC9325090          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  15 in total

1.  Development and Initial Validation of a Consumer Questionnaire to Predict the Presence of Ear Disease.

Authors:  Samantha J Kleindienst; David A Zapala; Donald W Nielsen; James W Griffith; Dania Rishiq; Larry Lundy; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 3.  Estimates of loudness, loudness discomfort, and the auditory dynamic range: normative estimates, comparison of procedures, and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Christopher A Burks
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

5.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  The importance of audiologic red flags in patient management decisions.

Authors:  David A Zapala; Kathryn Shaughnessy; Jill Buckingham; David B Hawkins
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Karen A Doherty; Tammy M Kordas; Joseph T Pellegrino
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  A Retrospective Estimate of Ear Disease Detection Using the "Red Flags" in a Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Niall A M Klyn; Samantha Kleindienst Robler; Razan Alfakir; Donald W Nielsen; James W Griffith; Deborah L Carlson; Larry Lundy; Sumitrajit Dhar; David A Zapala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Communication between Audiologist, Patient, and Patient's Family Members during Initial Audiology Consultation and Rehabilitation Planning Sessions: A Descriptive Review.

Authors:  Vinaya Manchaiah; Monica L Bellon-Harn; Ashley L Dockens; Jamie H Azios; William E Harn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.