Literature DB >> 16680621

Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.

Richard H Wilson1, Christopher A Burks.   

Abstract

Data from earlier studies that presented 70 words at 24 to 0 dB signal-to-babble (S/B) ratios indicated that most young listeners with normal hearing required 0 to 6 dB S/B ratios to attain 50% correct word recognition. Older listeners with hearing loss often required a >12 dB S/B ratio to attain 50% correct word recognition. In our study, we converted the Words in Noise test from one 70-word list into two 35-word lists for quicker administration by clinicians. Using baseline data from previous studies, we used two strategies to randomize the 35-word lists: based on recognition performance at each S/B ratio and based on recognition performance only. With the first randomization strategy, the 50% correct word-recognition points on the two lists differed by 0.5 dB for 72 listeners with hearing loss. With the second randomization strategy, 48 listeners with hearing loss performed identically on the two lists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16680621     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.01.0009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  18 in total

1.  Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Impaired timing and frequency discrimination in high-functioning autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anjali Bhatara; Talin Babikian; Elizabeth Laugeson; Raffi Tachdjian; Yvonne S Sininger
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Brandon M Madsen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Impaired auditory processing and neural representation of speech in noise among symptomatic post-concussion adults.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Pamela E Souza; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Auditory and Cognitive Behavioral Performance Deficits and Symptom Reporting in Postconcussion Syndrome Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Steven G Zecker; Howard J Hoffman; Robert Frisina; Judy R Dubno; Sumitrajit Dhar; Margaret Wallhagen; Nina Kraus; James W Griffith; Joseph P Walton; David A Eddins; Craig Newman; David Victorson; Catherine M Warrier; Richard H Wilson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.

Authors:  Angela N C Fulbright; Colleen G Le Prell; Scott K Griffiths; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  Reliability and Validity of the Spanish-Language Version of the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Rina S Fox; Jennifer J Manly; Jerry Slotkin; John Devin Peipert; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-04-08

10.  Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Speech-Recognition Threshold (SRT) in Noise Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.