| Literature DB >> 35902667 |
José A Cruz Ayala1, Mallory Crawford1, Mary C Gatterer2, Maria Tovar3, Jessica C Rivera2, Vinod Dasa2, Luis Marrero4,5.
Abstract
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) involves peri-articular sarcopenia. The infrapatellar articularis genu (AG) links to the quadriceps femoris (QF) and can be sampled from discarded tissue during arthroplasty. We predict disuse-mediated changes in AG myofiber type ratio and atrophy similar to reports on the QF during OA. OA AGs (n = 40) were preserved and grouped by poor (≤ 85°; n = 11), fair (90°-110°; n = 19), and good (≥ 115°; n = 10) range of motion (ROM). Immunolabeling of slow and fast myosin heavy chains in AG sections allowed comparing distribution and cross-sectional area (CSA) of type-I (T1) and type-II (T2) myofibers between groups and associating to ROM. T1/T2 ratios in fair and poor ROM groups was consistent with those published in OA QF. Increasing mean ± SD T2 percentages from good (43.31 ± 11.76), to fair (50.96 ± 5.85), and poor (60.02 ± 8.29) ROM groups was significant between poor versus fair (p = 0.018) and good (p < 0.0001) in association with ROM deficits (r = - 0.729; p < 0.0001). T1 and T2 CSA decreased with worsening ROM, which associates with lower symptom scores (r = 0.3198; p = 0.0472). In-depth evaluation of the OA AG as a surrogate for the OA QF relative to serum and/or synovial fluid biomarkers of sarcopenia could refine diagnostics of peri-articular muscle health to guide individualized strength rehabilitation after surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35902667 PMCID: PMC9334267 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17046-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Patient characteristics. Distribution of study participants by gender, race, and mean age, BMI, KL radiographic scores, KOOS and ROM for the total patient sample (n=40) or grouped by ROM status tested by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis using Graphpad PRISM 9, in which p < 0.05 is significant.
| Range of motion | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | Fair | Poor | |||||||
| NT | Mean or | NG | Mean (SD) or | NF | Mean (SD) or | NP | Mean (SD) or | ||
| Female | 24 | – | 7 | – | 11 | – | 6 | – | – |
| Male | 16 | – | 3 | – | 8 | – | 5 | – | – |
| – | |||||||||
| Black | 14 | – | 4 | – | 6 | – | 4 | – | – |
| White | 23 | – | 6 | – | 11 | – | 6 | – | – |
| Other | 3 | – | 0 | – | 2 | – | 1 | – | – |
| 40 | 66.85 | 10 | 67.6 (9.09) | 19 | 68.11 (8.94) | 11 | 64.0 (9.37) | 0.477 | |
| 40 | 33.19 | 10 | 33.7 (5.12) | 19 | 32.4 (4.72) | 11 | 34.2 (5.88) | 0.631 | |
| 40 | 3.93 | 10 | 3.90 (0.32) | 19 | 3.95 (0.23) | 11 | 3.91 (0.30) | 0.883 | |
| 40 | 99.88 | 10 | 125.50 (7.62) | 19 | 99.74 (7.72) | 11 | 76.82 (8.45) | < 0.0001 | |
| Symptoms | 39 | – | 9 | 19 | 11 | 0.1823 | |||
| Pain | 39 | – | 9 | 19 | 11 | 0.4282 | |||
| ADL | 39 | – | 9 | 19 | 11 | 0.7268 | |||
| QOL | 39 | – | 9 | 19 | 11 | 0.4025 | |||
NT = total patient sample; NG = good ROM group; NF = fair ROM group; NP = poor ROM group.
Figure 1Myofiber distribution and CSA relative to ROM. Representative merged photomicrographs of co-labeled T1 (green), and T2 (red) myofibers in AG sections from (A) good, (B) fair, and (C) poor ROM patient groups were segmented by individual (A’–C’) T1, and (A”–C”) T2 grayscale channels for fiber count and CSA analyses using Slidebook 5 and Graphpad PRISM 9 software for morphometry and statistics, respectively. Bars = 50 µm. (D) Mean ± SD fiber counts between and within ROM groups. (E) Spearman’s ρ (r) was calculated between T2 (and correspondingly T1) fibers and total ROM. Data points were shaded according to severity of FxC, and r calculated between FxC and T2 content. (F) Mean CSAs were compared within and between ROM groups and (G) tested for associations with both total ROM and FxC. *p < 0.05 between groups and #p < 0.05 within groups; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; and ****p < 0.0001.