| Literature DB >> 35902664 |
Susana Flecha1,2, Àlex Giménez-Romero3, Joaquín Tintoré4,5, Fiz F Pérez6, Eva Alou-Font5, Manuel A Matías3, Iris E Hendriks4.
Abstract
The decreasing seawater pH trend associated with increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels is an issue of concern due to possible negative consequences for marine organisms, especially calcifiers. Globally, coastal areas represent important transitional land-ocean zones with complex interactions between biological, physical and chemical processes. Here, we evaluated the pH variability at two sites in the coastal area of the Balearic Sea (Western Mediterranean). High resolution pH data along with temperature, salinity, and also dissolved oxygen were obtained with autonomous sensors from 2018 to 2021 in order to determine the temporal pH variability and the principal drivers involved. By using environmental datasets of temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen, Recurrent Neural Networks were trained to predict pH and fill data gaps. Longer environmental time series (2012-2021) were used to obtain the pH trend using reconstructed data. The best predictions show a rate of [Formula: see text] pH units year[Formula: see text], which is in good agreement with other observations of pH rates in coastal areas. The methodology presented here opens the possibility to obtain pH trends when only limited pH observations are available, if other variables are accessible. Potentially, this could be a way to reliably fill the unavoidable gaps present in time series data provided by sensors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35902664 PMCID: PMC9333055 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17253-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Daily averaged time series data from the Bay of Palma (black dots) and Cabrera stations (grey dots): (a) temperature (C), (b) salinity (psu), (c) dissolved oxygen (DO) () and (d) pH in pH units. The pH time series of the Bay of Palma will be reconstructed in the period 2012–2021 while only gaps will be filled in Cabrera, as marked in blue in the figure.
Figure 2Bidirectional LSTM neural network model applied to assess the decadal pH trend in the Bay of Palma: (a) training process monitoring loss for both training and validation sets, (b) predicted pH values against their true values where the black line is the reference for a perfect prediction, (c) predicted pH time series in the training process (orange) and ground truth series (blue) and (d) final prediction for the decadal pH time series using the output data of the trained model and the measured data. Measured pH data shown in blue, predicted data in the training process is shown in orange and reconstructed data is shown in red. The black line represents the decadal pH trend.
Figure 3Bidirectional LSTM Neural Network model applied to fill the gaps in the pH time series in Cabrera: (a) training process monitoring loss for both training and validation sets, (b) Predicted pH values against their true values where the black line is the reference for perfect prediction, (c) Predicted pH time series in the training process (orange) and ground truth series (blue) and (d) Gaps in the pH time series filled with the trained model (red), while measured pH are shown in blue and predicted data in the training process shown in orange.
Figure 4(a) Map of the stations location in the Western Mediterranean Sea Basin (red dots) and (b) detailed location of the Bay of Palma (red star) and the Cabrera National Park (Cabrera NP, red dot) study sites. Maps were developed with the MATLAB® R2010b software (https://mathworks.com) by using the M_Map toolbox[70].
Optimal parameters used for the different RNN architectures.
| Hidden layers | Nodes/cells | Window size | Activation function | Output function | Loss | Learning rate | Optimizer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRNN | 1 | 3 | 6 | Tanh | Sigmoid | MSE | 0.01 | Adam |
| LSTM | 1 | 3 | 6 | Tanh | Sigmoid | MSE | 0.01 | Adam |
| BD-LSTM | 1 | 3 | 6 | Tanh | Sigmoid | MSE | 0.01 | Adam |
| BD-GRU | 1 | 1 | 6 | Tanh | Sigmoid | MSE | 0.01 | Adam |
Statistical comparison between different RNN architectures.
| Slope | Intercept | Training error | Validation error | Training epochs | Training time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNN | − 0.0021 ± 0.00077 | 8.07 ± 0.006 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 0.72 ± 0.12 | 293 ± 95 | 15.52 ± 4.75 |
| LSTM | − 0.0018 ± 0.00067 | 8.06 ± 0.005 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 245 ± 68 | 17.55 ± 4.21 |
| BD-LSTM | − 0.0020 ± 0.00054 | 8.07 ± 0.004 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.64 ± 0.04 | 167 ± 45 | 15.13 ± 3.00 |
| BD-GRU | − 0.0020 ± 0.00066 | 8.07 ± 0.005 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 347 ± 95 | 27.68 ± 6.84 |