Literature DB >> 35900684

Efficacy of sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in reducing anastomotic mediastinal/pleural cavity leak.

Litao Yang1,2,3, Zhinuan Hong1,2,4, Zhiwei Lin1,2,4, Zhenyang Zhang5,6, Jiangbo Lin7,8, Mingduan Chen1,4, Xiaojie Yang1,2, Yukang Lin2, Wenwei Lin1,4, Jiafu Zhu1,2, Shuhan Xie1,2, Mingqiang Kang1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic mediastinal/pleural cavity leak (AMPCL) is a life-threatening postoperative complication after esophagectomy. The objective of this study was to find a safe and effective surgical method to reduce the incidence of AMPCL.
METHODS: A total of 223 patients who underwent surgery in Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from May 2020 to October 2021 were enrolled in this study. Data for preoperative and postoperative test indices, postoperative complications, perioperative treatment were collected. After using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to match two cohort (caliper = 0.1), the relationship between various factors and the incidence of AMPCL were analyzed.
RESULTS: 209 patients were included for further analysis in the end. There were 95 patients in the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap embedding group (intervention group) and 114 in the routine operation group (control group). There was a significant difference in mean age between two groups. Gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, American society of anesthesiologists score, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, pathological stage were included in performing 1:1 PSM, and there were no significant differences between two groups. Median operative time was significantly less in intervention group. Anastomotic leak (AL) did not present significant difference between two groups (8 [8.6] vs. 13 [14.0], p = 0.247), however, the AMPCL in intervention group was significantly lower than control group (0 [0] vs. 6 [6.5], p = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: The sternocleidomastoid muscle flap embedding could significantly reduce the incidence of AMPCL. This additional procedure is safe, and effective without increase in the occurrence of postoperative complications and hospital expenses.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic mediastinal/pleural cavity leak; Complication; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35900684     DOI: 10.1007/s10388-022-00946-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   3.671


  31 in total

1.  Characteristics and clinical significance of lymph node metastases near the recurrent laryngeal nerve from thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K Ye; J H Xu; Y F Sun; J A Lin; Z G Zheng
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2014-08-25

2.  Omentoplasty Decreases Leak Rate After Esophagectomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangxin Tuo; Gang Jin; Yao Pang; Wenhao Wang; Xiaolei Zhu; Hongyi Zhang; Yi Yang; Peng Wu; Zijiang Zhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center initial experience.

Authors:  Olugbenga T Okusanya; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Nicholas R Hess; Katie S Nason; Manuel Villa Sanchez; Ryan M Levy; Arjun Pennathur; James D Luketich
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

4.  Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

Authors:  Leonie R van der Werf; Linde A D Busweiler; Johanna W van Sandick; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Outcomes following the main treatment options in patients with a leaking esophagus: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  S Persson; I Rouvelas; T Irino; L Lundell
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer: a mortality-free experience.

Authors:  Abeezar I Sarela; Damian J Tolan; Keith Harris; Simon P Dexter; Henry M Sue-Ling
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Comparison of short-term outcomes and three yearsurvival between total minimally invasive McKeown and dual-incision esophagectomy.

Authors:  Ju-Wei Mu; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yu-Shun Gao; Jin-Feng Huang; Jie He
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; J R Bundred; P Singh; S Pasquali; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.