Literature DB >> 30676381

Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

Leonie R van der Werf1, Linde A D Busweiler2, Johanna W van Sandick3, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen2, Bas P L Wijnhoven1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This nation-wide population-based study aimed to report postoperative morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy and gastrectomy in the Netherlands according to the definitions of the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).
BACKGROUND: To standardize international outcome reporting in esophageal surgery, the ECCG developed a standardized outcomes set.
METHODS: For this national cohort study, all patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy for cancer between 2016 and 2017 were selected from the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. In a random sample of hospitals, data completeness and accuracy were validated by reabstraction of the data. The investigated outcomes in the present study were postoperative complications, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III), and 30-day mortality, according to definitions of the ECCG.
RESULTS: A total of 2545 patients from 22 hospitals were included. The completeness of the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit was estimated at 99.8%. Data accuracy on different items was 94% to 100%. After esophagectomy, 1046 of 1617 patients (65%) had a postoperative complication including 468 patients (29%) with a major complication. Most common complications were pneumonia (21%), esophago-enteric leak from anastomosis, staple line or localized conduit necrosis (19%), and atrial dysrhythmia (15%). The 30-day mortality was 1.7%. After gastrectomy, 397 of 928 patients (42%) had a postoperative complication including 180 patients (19%) with a major complication. Most common complications were pneumonia (12%), esophago-enteric leak from anastomosis, staple line or localized conduit necrosis (9%), and acute delirium (5%). The 30-day mortality was 4.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Reporting complications according to the ECCG platform is feasible in the Netherlands and facilitates international benchmarking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30676381     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  29 in total

1.  Recent advances in defining and benchmarking complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lucas Goense; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillergersberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

Authors: 
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Peripheral blood inflammation indices are effective predictors of anastomotic leakage in elective esophageal surgery.

Authors:  Cai-Xia Wu; Ding-Yu Rao; Cheng-Peng Sang; Shen-Yu Zhu; Liang Gu; Yan-Yang Wu; Jian-Feng Wang; Hua-Qiu Shi; Xiang-Cai Wang; Zhi-Xian Tang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

4.  Efficacy of sternocleidomastoid muscle flap in reducing anastomotic mediastinal/pleural cavity leak.

Authors:  Litao Yang; Zhinuan Hong; Zhiwei Lin; Zhenyang Zhang; Jiangbo Lin; Mingduan Chen; Xiaojie Yang; Yukang Lin; Wenwei Lin; Jiafu Zhu; Shuhan Xie; Mingqiang Kang
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  De-novo Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer after Liver Transplantation: A Demographic Report.

Authors:  E M Dobrindt; M Biebl; S Rademacher; C Denecke; A Andreou; J Raakow; D Kröll; R Öllinger; J Pratschke; S S Chopra
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2020

6.  Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).

Authors: 
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

7.  Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).

Authors: 
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

8.  Long-Term Quality of Life Following Transthoracic and Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  E Jezerskyte; L M Saadeh; E R C Hagens; M A G Sprangers; L Noteboom; H W M van Laarhoven; W J Eshuis; M C C M Hulshof; M I van Berge Henegouwen; S S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer: The role of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Bas Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-07-25

10.  Outcomes of esophagectomy after noncurative endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Solène Dermine; Mahaut Leconte; Sarah Leblanc; Bertrand Dousset; Benoit Terris; Arthur Berger; Anne Berger; Gabriel Rahmi; Vincent Lepilliez; Olivier Plomteux; Philippe Leclercq; Romain Coriat; Stanislas Chaussade; Frédéric Prat; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.