Literature DB >> 3589823

The relationship of pain provocation to lumbar disc deterioration as seen by CT/discography.

H Vanharanta, B L Sachs, M A Spivey, R D Guyer, S H Hochschuler, R F Rashbaum, R G Johnson, D Ohnmeiss, V Mooney.   

Abstract

The CT/discographic findings from 225 discs in 91 low-back pain patients were compared to the pain provocation during the injection of contrast into the disc. The radiographic appearance of disc deterioration demonstrating disc degeneration and annular disruption of each disc was classified separately using a fourpoint scale: normal, slight, moderate, or severe. Pain reaction to the discogram at each level was recorded as follows: no pain, dissimilar pain, similar pain, or exact reproduction of the patient's clinical pain. This more precise analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between pain and deterioration of discs. The CT/discogram presents an axial view of the disc that allows a subgrouping of disc deterioration that can discriminate between peripheral deterioration (degeneration) and internal deterioration (disruption). The disruption supposedly occurs earlier and is more likely to be the source of exact pain reproduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3589823     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198704000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

2.  Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus; M Kurs-Lasky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  The "dehydrated" lumbar intervertebral disk on MR, its anatomy, biochemistry and biomechanics.

Authors:  Vitcor Haughton
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Morphology of the cartilaginous endplates in human intervertebral disks with ultrashort echo time MR imaging.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Sheronda Statum; Zhao Zhang; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Jiang Du; Graeme M Bydder; Koichi Masuda; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  In vivo 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation mapping in subjects with intervertebral disc degeneration and clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Gabrielle Blumenkrantz; Jin Zuo; Xiaojuan Li; John Kornak; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  [Facet blockade, peridural and periradicular pain therapy].

Authors:  T Waggershauser; S Schwarzkopf; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Conventional and ultrashort time-to-echo magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage, meniscus, and intervertebral disk.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Jiang Du; Graeme M Bydder; Christine B Chung
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10

8.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection?

Authors:  Chang Ho Kang; Yun Hwan Kim; Sang-Heon Lee; Richard Derby; Jung Hyuk Kim; Kyoo Byung Chung; Deuk Jae Sung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Cervical discography in discogenic pain syndrome and its predictive value for cervical fusion.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; M Aebi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Pain improvement after intradiskal lidocaine administration in provocation lumbar diskography: association with diskographic contrast leakage.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.