| Literature DB >> 35897824 |
Maria Pia Adorni1, Marta Biolo2, Francesca Zimetti3, Marcella Palumbo3, Nicoletta Ronda3, Paolo Scarinzi2, Paolo Simioni2, Maria Giovanna Lupo2, Nicola Ferri2, Lorenzo Previato2, Franco Bernini3, Alberto Zambon4.
Abstract
Achilles tendon xanthoma (ATX) formation involves macrophage cholesterol accumulation within the tendon, similar to an atheroma. Macrophage cholesterol homeostasis depends on serum lipoprotein functions, namely the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) capacity to promote cell cholesterol efflux (CEC) and the serum capacity to promote cell cholesterol accumulation (CLC). We explored the HDL-CEC and serum CLC, comparing 16 FH patients with ATX to 29 FH patients without ATX. HDL-CEC through the main efflux mechanisms mediated by the transporters ATP binding cassette G1 (ABCG1) and A1 (ABCA1) and the aqueous diffusion (AD) process was determined by a cell-based radioisotopic technique and serum CLC fluorimetrically. Between the two groups, no significant differences were found in terms of plasma lipid profile. A trend toward reduction of cholesterol efflux via AD and a significant increase in ABCA1-mediated HDL-CEC (+18.6%) was observed in ATX compared to no ATX patients. In ATX-presenting patients, ABCG1-mediated HDL-CEC was lower (-11%) and serum CLC was higher (+14%) compared to patients without ATX. Considering all the patients together, ABCG1 HDL-CEC and serum CLC correlated with ATX thickness inversely (p = 0.013) and directly (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, lipoprotein dysfunctions seem to be involved in ATX physiopathology and progression.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon; HDL cholesterol efflux; macrophage; serum cholesterol loading; xanthoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897824 PMCID: PMC9332368 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
General characteristics of the study population.
| Characteristics | Xanthoma | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Present | |||
| 42.1 ± 18.6 | 46.3 ± 13.9 | n.s. | ||
| 5 (31.2%) | 11 (37.9%) | n.s. | ||
| 24.2 ± 5.3 | 25.9 ± 5.8 | n.s. | ||
| 0.54 (1.7) | 0.25 (0.94) | n.s. | ||
|
| 6.4 ± 3.1 | 11.0 ± 5.0 | <0.001 | |
| Smoking | 8 (50.0%) | 6 (20.7%) | 0.04 | |
| Arterial Hypertension | 1 (6.3%) | 3 (10.3%) | n.s. | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 0 | 0 | n.s. | |
| ASCVD familiarity | 3 (18.8%) | 15 (51.7%) | 0.03 | |
| Early cardiovascular events—n. (%) | 3 (18.8%) | 3 (10.3%) | n.s. | |
| Total Cholesterol | 223.8 ± 66.8 | 260.4 ± 80.7 | n.s. | |
| HDL Cholesterol | 61.2 ± 16.6 | 55.9 ± 14.0 | n.s. | |
| LDL Cholesterol | 141.3 ± 57.2 | 180.1 ± 77.0 | n.s. | |
| Triglyceride | 106.9 ± 49.0 | 124.5 ± 77.1 | n.s. | |
| Oxidized LDL | 56.3 ± 13.7 | 74.4 ± 34.3 | n.s | |
| apoB | 109.7 ± 26.3 | 131.5 ± 44.2 | n.s. | |
| Statin | 11 (68.6%) | 16 (55.2%) | n.s. | |
| Ezetimibe | 4 (25.0%) | 13 (44.8%) | n.s. | |
| None | 5 (31.2%) | 13 (44.8%) | n.s. | |
ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BMI: body mass index; DLCN score: Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score; HDL: high-density lipoproteins; hs-CRP: high sensitivity C-reactive protein; IQR: interquartile range; LDL: low-density lipoproteins; med: median; n.s.: not significant; SD: standard deviation. Normally distributed continuous parameters were presented as mean ± SD, and skewed continuous parameters were expressed as the median and interquartile range (defined as 25th percentile to 75th percentile).
Figure 1HDL cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) in FH subjects not presenting or presenting ATX. (A): total HDL-CEC; (B): AD HDL-CEC; (C): ABCA1-mediated HDL-CEC; (D): ABCG1-mediated HDL-CEC. Each point of the graph represents the average percentage of triplicate analyses for each sample. The average of each group is represented by a horizontal, solid line. ○ No ATX: FH subjects not presenting ATX; ● ATX: FH subjects presenting ATX. Significant values are shown in bold.
Figure 2Serum cholesterol efflux capacity (CLC) in FH subjects not presenting or presenting ATX. Each point of the graph represents the average percentage of triplicate analyses for each sample. The average of each group is represented by a horizontal, solid line. ○ No ATX: FH subjects not presenting ATX; ● ATX: FH subjects presenting ATX.
Figure 3Correlation between ABCG1-mediated HDL-CEC and serum cholesterol loading capacity (CLC) in FH subjects. Pearson correlation coefficient was reported. ○: subjects not presenting ATX; ●: subjects presenting ATX.
Correlation between HDL cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and Achilles tendon thickness.
| HDL-CEC Pathways | r | |
|---|---|---|
| Total HDL-CEC | −0.104 | 0.497 |
| AD HDL-CEC |
|
|
| ABCA1 HDL-CEC | 0.186 | 0.221 |
| ABCG1 HDL-CEC |
|
|
Correlation analyses were performed to highlight the relationship between parameters, and the Spearman correlation coefficients were reported. Significant associations are shown in bold.
Figure 4Correlation between serum cholesterol loading capacity (CLC) and Achilles tendon thickness in FH subjects. Spearman correlation coefficient was reported. ○: subjects not presenting ATX; ●: subjects presenting ATX.