| Literature DB >> 35897697 |
Adela González-Jiménez1, Pilar López-Cotarelo1, Teresa Agudo-Jiménez1, Ignacio Casanova2, Carlos López de Silanes2, Ángeles Martín-Requero3,4, Fuencisla Matesanz5, Elena Urcelay1, Laura Espino-Paisán1.
Abstract
Deficiencies in Mannosidase β (MANBA) are associated with neurological abnormalities and recurrent infections. The single nucleotide polymorphism located in the 3'UTR of MANBA, rs7665090, was found to be associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility. We aimed to study the functional impact of this polymorphism in lymphocytes isolated from MS patients and healthy controls. A total of 152 MS patients and 112 controls were genotyped for rs7665090. MANBA mRNA expression was quantified through qPCR and MANBA enzymatic activity was analyzed. Upon phytohemagglutinin stimulation, immune activation was evaluated by flow cytometry detection of CD69, endocytic function, and metabolic rates with Seahorse XFp Analyzer, and results were stratified by variation in rs7665090. A significantly reduced gene expression (p < 0.0001) and enzymatic activity (p = 0.018) of MANBA were found in lymphocytes of MS patients compared to those of controls. The rs7665090*GG genotype led to a significant β-mannosidase enzymatic deficiency correlated with lysosomal dysfunction, as well as decreased metabolic activation in lymphocytes of MS patients compared to those of rs7665090*GG controls. In contrast, lymphocytes of MS patients and controls carrying the homozygous AA genotype behaved similarly. Our work provides new evidence highlighting the impact of the MS-risk variant, rs7665090, and the role of MANBA in the immunopathology of MS.Entities:
Keywords: B cells; MANBA; T cells; genetic biomarkers; immune system; immunoregulation; multiple sclerosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897697 PMCID: PMC9331056 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1MANBA expression and activity in PBMCs. (A) MANBA expression in PBMCs from healthy donors and MS patients (controls n = 112; MS n = 151; interferon β n = 94; glatiramer acetate n = 57). Percentage of difference between means in Control vs. MS = 15.5 ± 3.13%; Control vs. interferon β = 19.31 ± 3.43%; Control vs. MS glatiramer acetate = 9.4 ± 4.0%. (B) MANBA activity in PBMCs from healthy donors and MS patients (controls n = 30; MS n = 47; interferon β n = 26; glatiramer acetate n = 21). Percentage of difference between means in Control vs. MS = 29.59 ± 12.2%; Control vs. MS interferon β = 28.61 ± 14.52%; Control vs. MS glatiramer acetate = 30.8 ± 13.64%. (C) MANBA expression in controls and MS patients stratified by rs7665090 genotypes (controls GG n = 41; controls AA n = 31; MS GG n = 36; MS AA n = 43). Percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG= 16.84 ± 5.5%; Control AA vs. MS AA= 18.82 ± 6.36%. (D) Effect of rs7665090 genotypes on MANBA activity (controls GG n = 10; controls AA n = 9; MS GG n = 13; MS AA n = 14). Percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG = 39.17 ± 17.7%. Box and whiskers diagrams: the line represents the median value, the box the 25 and 75 percentiles and whiskers mark maximum and minimum values. All comparisons were performed with Student’s t test.
Figure 2Effect of rs7665090 genotypes on endocytosisin PBMCs from healthy donors and MS patients pre-stimulated for 24 h or not with PHA. (A) Endocytosis of A488-Dextran 10 KDa at 0.5 mg/mL for 15 min by overall PBMCs, T cells (CD3+CD20−), B cells (CD3−CD20+) and other lymphocytes (CD3−CD20−) was assessed (controls GG n = 10; controls AA n = 12; MS GG n = 13; MS AA n = 13). PBMCs: percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. Control AA = 24.94 ± 20.29%; Control GG vs. MS GG = 29.66 ± 22.75%; Percentage of difference between means in CD3+CD20−: Control GG vs. Control AA = 43.51 ± 15.54%; Percentage of difference between means in CD3−CD20+: Control GG vs. MS GG = 59.58 ± 23.05%. (B) Endocytosis of A488-BSA at 25 µg/mL for 4 h in the same cellular subsets (controls GG n = 15; controls AA n = 15; MS GG n = 14; MS AA n = 12). PBMCs: percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG = 32.33 ± 11.69%; CD3+CD20−: percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG = 28.5 ± 11.3%; Percentage of difference between means in CD3−CD20−: Control GG vs. MS GG = 46.97 ± 17.15%; MS GG vs. MS AA = 38.33 ± 18.73%. Box and whiskers diagrams: the line represents the median value, the box the 25 and 75 percentiles and whiskers mark maximum and minimum values. All comparisons were performed with Student’s t test.
Figure 3Immune cell activation upon PHA stimulation regulated by rs7665090. The effect of rs7665090 genotypes in CD69 surface expression of (A) CD3+CD20− lymphocytes (controls GG n = 5; controls AA n = 5; MSGG n = 7; MS AA n = 8). Percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG = 73.82 ± 17.21%; MS GG vs. MS AA = 61.65 ± 19.8%; (B) CD3−CD20+lymphocytes (controls GG n = 5; controls AA n = 4; MS GG n = 7; MS AA n = 8). Percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. MS GG = 58.62 ± 25.35%; MS GG vs. MS AA = 50.26 ± 18.63%; and (C) CD3−CD20−lymphocytes (controls GG n = 5; controls AA n = 5; MS GG n = 8; MS AA n = 8). MFI (median fluorescence intensity) × % of CD69+ cells ± standard deviation is shown. Box and whiskers diagrams: the line represents the median value, the box the 25 and 75 percentiles and whiskers mark maximum and minimum values. All comparisons were performed with Student’s t test.
Figure 4Influence of rs7665090 genotypes on PBMCs metabolism. (A) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) profile of PBMCs from controls and MS patients with/without PHA stimulation stratified by rs7665090 genotype. (B) Effect of rs7665090 genotypes on metabolic changes induced by PHA stimulation of PBMCs. An increment of basal respiration induced by PHA over an increment of basal glycolysis (Extracellular acidification rate, ECAR) is shown. (C) Effect of rs7665090 on basal respiration, ATP production, basal glycolysis, and glycolytic reserve (controls GG n = 6; controls AA n = 6; MS GG n = 9; MS AA n = 10). Basal respiration: percentage of difference between means in control GG vs. Control AA = 37.23 ± 14.53%; control GG vs. MS GG = 31.01 ± 14.28%; ATP production: percentage of difference in between means Control GG vs. control AA = 31.63 ± 13.67%; Control GG vs. MS GG = 27.14 ± 13.42%; Basal glycolysis: percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. Control AA = 32.08 ± 12.74%; Control GG vs. MS GG = 39.42 ± 11.65%; Glycolytic reserve: percentage of difference between means in Control GG vs. Control AA = 49.06 ± 8.1%; Control GG vs. MS GG = 38.61 ± 11.05%. Box and whiskers diagrams: the line represents the median value, the box the 25 and 75 percentiles, and whiskers mark maximum and minimum values. All comparisons were performed with Student’s t test.
Analysis of rs7665090 (highlighted in bold letters) and nearby proxies according to RegulomeDB data. 1b: Likely to affect binding and linked to expression of a gene target (eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase Footprint + DNase peak); 1f: Likely to affect binding and linked to expression of a gene target (eQTL + TF binding/DNase peak).
| SNP | Location | Alleles | Distance to rs7665090 (bp) | D′ | R2 | Correlated Alleles | RegulomeDB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Score | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| rs4013 | chr4:103552813 | (C/T) | 1210 | 1.0 | 1.0 | A = C, G = T | 1f | 0.553 |
| rs735403 | chr4:103553543 | (C/T) | 1940 | 1.0 | 1.0 | A = C, G = T | 1f | 0.360 |
| rs735404 | chr4:103553665 | (G/A) | 2062 | 0.996 | 0.988 | A = G, G = A | 1f | 0.223 |
| rs2125211 | chr4:103559876 | (A/G) | 8273 | 1.0 | 1.0 | A = A, G = G | 1f | 0.223 |
| rs227361 | chr4:103586977 | (C/T) | 35,374 | 0.93 | 0.812 | A = T, G = C | 1b | 0.995 |