| Literature DB >> 35897383 |
Binghai Sun1,2,3,4, Feng Zhu1,2,3,4, Shuwei Lin1,2,3,4, Jiayu Sun5, Ying Wu1,2,3,4, Weilong Xiao1,2,3,4.
Abstract
(1) Purpose: Previous studies investigated the positive relationship between professional identity and career satisfaction in teachers, but the underlying reasons were not explored. Therefore, the present study explores the mediating effects of two variables, namely, psychological empowerment and work engagement on the relationship between professional identity and career satisfaction. (2) Method: The present study used the professional identity scale, psychological empowerment scale, Utrecht Work Engagement scale and career satisfaction scale to investigate 2104 teachers (Mage = 39.50 years, SD = 8.74) in a province in China. The demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, teaching age) were controlled as covariates to conduct conservative predictions. (3) Result: (a) professional identity is positively related to career satisfaction; (b) psychological empowerment and career satisfaction play parallel mediator roles between professional identity and career satisfaction; (c) psychological empowerment and career satisfaction play serial mediator roles between professional identity and career satisfaction. (4) Limitations: Data were collected by participant self-report. This method may lead to recall bias. Further, we adopted a cross-sectional rather than experimental or longitudinal design, thus precluding causal conclusions. Lastly, it would be useful to validate our findings with a national sample. (5) Conclusions: The present study indicates that the relationship between professional identity is positively associated with teacher career satisfaction. More importantly, professional identity can indirectly make an impact on teacher career satisfaction through the single mediating effects of psychological empowerment and work engagement, and the chain mediating effect, by improving the level of psychological empowerment, and thereby increasing work engagement.Entities:
Keywords: career satisfaction; professional identity; psychological empowerment; teachers; work engagement
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897383 PMCID: PMC9332691 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The multiple mediation model.
Means, Standard Deviations, and Inter-Correlations between the Main Variables (N = 2014).
|
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PI | 4.5 | 0.49 | 1 |
|
|
|
| 2. PE | 3.89 | 0.68 | 0.59 ** | 1 |
|
|
| 3. WE | 3.90 | 0.78 | 0.63 ** | 0.69 ** | 1 |
|
| 4. CS | 3.83 | 0.85 | 0.54 ** | 0.67 ** | 0.65 ** | 1 |
Note: ** p < 0.01. Abbreviations: PI, professional identity; PE, psychological empowerment; WE, work engagement; CS, career satisfaction.
Testing Psychological Empowerment as a Mediator in the Relationship between Professional Identity and Career Satisfaction (N = 2104).
| Criterion | Predictors |
|
|
| Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | PI | 0.59 | 0.35 | 284.70 *** | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 33.13 *** |
| CS | PI | 0.70 | 0.49 | 400.32 *** | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.46 | 11.47 *** |
| PE | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 28.10 *** |
Note: *** p < 0.001. Standardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. Abbreviations: PI, professional identity; PE, psychological empowerment; CS, career satisfaction LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Testing Work engagement as a Mediator in the Relationship between Professional Identity and Career Satisfaction (N = 2104).
| Criterion | Predictors |
|
|
| Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WE | PI | 0.64 | 0.41 | 368.58 *** | 0.62 | 0.92 | 1.07 | 37.25 *** |
| CS | PI | 0.67 | 0.46 | 350.72 *** | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.46 | 10.28 *** |
| WE | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 24.79 *** |
Note: *** p < 0.001. Standardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. Abbreviations: PI, professional identity; WE, work engagement; CS, career satisfaction; LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Testing the Pathways of the Multiple Mediation Model.
| Effect |
|
| 95%Boot LLCI | 95%Boot ULCI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct effects | ||||
| PI→PE | 0.58 *** | 0.02 | 0.76 | 0.88 |
| PI→WE | 0.34 *** | 0.03 | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| PE→WE | 0.49 *** | 0.02 | 0.51 | 0.60 |
| PI→CS | 0.12 *** | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.27 |
| PE→CS | 0.39 *** | 0.03 | 0.43 | 0.54 |
| WE→CS | 0.31 *** | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.40 |
| Indirect effects | ||||
| PI→PE→CS | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| PI→WE→CS | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
| PI→PE→WE→CS | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
Note: *** p < 0.001. Standardized regression coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. Abbreviations: PI, professional identity; PE, psychological empowerment; WE, work engagement; CS, career satisfaction; LL, low limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2The pathway coefficients of multiple mediation model. *** p < 0.0014.