| Literature DB >> 35893784 |
Irit Vahav1,2,3, Maria Thon1,4, Lenie J van den Broek1, Sander W Spiekstra1,4, Beren Atac2,5, Gerd Lindner2,6, Katharina Schimek2, Uwe Marx2, Susan Gibbs1,4,7.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical and personal care industries require human representative models for testing to ensure the safety of their products. A major route of penetration into our body after substance exposure is via the skin. Our aim was to generate robust culture conditions for a next generation human skin-on-chip model containing neopapillae and to establish proof-of-concept testing with the sensitizer, cinnamaldehyde. Reconstructed human skin consisting of a stratified and differentiated epidermis on a fibroblast populated hydrogel containing neopapillae spheroids (RhS-NP), were cultured air-exposed and under dynamic flow for 10 days. The robustness of three independent experiments, each with up to 21 intra-experiment replicates, was investigated. The epidermis was seen to invaginate into the hydrogel towards the neopapille spheroids. Daily measurements of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and glucose levels within the culture medium demonstrated high viability and stable metabolic activity throughout the culture period in all three independent experiments and in the replicates within an experiment. Topical cinnamaldehyde exposure to RhS-NP resulted in dose-dependent cytotoxicity (increased LDH release) and elevated cytokine secretion of contact sensitizer specific IL-18, pro-inflammatory IL-1β, inflammatory IL-23 and IFN-γ, as well as anti-inflammatory IL-10 and IL-12p70. This study demonstrates the robustness and feasibility of complex next generation skin models for investigating skin immunotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: hair follicle; in vitro; neopapillae; organ on chip; reconstructed human skin; reproducible; robust; sensitizer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893784 PMCID: PMC9330995 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Figure 1Reconstructed human skin with neopapillae (RhS-NP) integrated in the HUMIMIC Chip2. (a) The left image shows individual layers of the HUMIMIC Chip2 device: a glass slide with PDMS layer imprinted with microfluidic channels and an adapter plate containing the cell culture compartments and pump connectors of two independent circuits for replicate culture within a single chip. The right image exhibits the HUMIMIC Chip2 from below: the small compartment is the reservoir for the culture medium and the big compartment is for RhS-NP. The two compartments are interconnected with microfluidic channels filled with culture medium. (b) macroscopic view of the HUMIMIC Chip2 with on-chip micropumps, generating a pulsatile flow, adjusted by a control unit. (c) RhS-NP in Millicell® cell culture inserts (9 mm inner diameter) integrated in the HUMIMIC Chip2 device (RhS-NP in culture insert marked in red).
Figure 2RhS-NP cultured under dynamic flow. (a) light microscopy image of bulk culture of neopapillae spheroids (inlay shows one spheroid) cultured in a 6-well plate, scale bar = 100 µm; (b–d) hematoxylin and eosin-(H&E) stained paraffin sections show NP located beneath the epidermis within the hydrogel (arrows) and invaginating epidermal keratinocytes in the vicinity of an NP (arrow heads). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 3Inter-experiment reproducibility. (a) Glucose level in supernatants (glucose concentration in original medium is shown in a dashed line) and (b) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-release levels were measured daily from the supernatant of RhS-NP cultured over 10 days under dynamic flow. The data represents three independent experiments (experiment 1: black dots; experiment 2: blue squares; experiment 3: red triangles) and values are expressed in mean ± SEM of up to 21 intra-experimental replicates. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and no significant difference was found with one-way ANOVA.
Figure 4The assessment of intra-experiment reproducibility of RhS-NP cultured at day 10 under dynamic flow. Measurements of (a) glucose level (glucose concentration in medium is shown in a dashed line), (b) LDH and (c) cytokine IL-18 release in the supernatant of RhS-NP of single experimental repeat. Each black dot represents a single RhS-NP dynamic culture and cultures are already grouped in preparation for dose response chemical exposure. The horizontal line represents mean; ≤3 intra-experimental replicates. No significant difference was found with one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 5Topical exposure of cinnamaldehyde onto RhS-NP for 24 h starting at day 10 of dynamic flow culture. (a) Macroscopic view of topical application using filter paper (marked in red) on the stratum corneum of RhS-NP. (b) H&E staining of the RhS-NP model exposed to cinnamaldehyde (60 mmol/L) for 24 h. Histology shows the detrimental effects of cinnamaldehyde penetrating into the invaginated epidermis and NP disruption (cf. Figure 2b–d; unexposed RhS-NP). Extreme disruptions reaching the basal layer are shown by arrows, Scale bar = 100 µm. (c) LDH levels in the supernatant of unexposed (u), vehicle (v) and exposed RhS-NP show a dose dependent cytotoxicity after cinnamaldehyde exposure (24 h) and the increased release of sensitizer biomarker Interleukin-18 (IL-18). Each black dot represents a single RhS-NP. The horizontal line represents mean; ≤3 intra-experimental replicates. A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality, and no significant difference was found with one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test) for LDH; a significant difference was found for IL-18 at 80 mmol/L cinnamaldehyde with one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis test) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, * p < 0.05.
Cytokine including chemokine baseline secretion from unexposed RhS-NP and function.
| Cytokine | Unexposed RhS-NP, (Amount +/− SEM) | Function |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| IL-18 | 14.0 +/− 5.5 pg/mL | Stimulates Th1 response; contact sensitizer specific biomarker |
| IL-33 # | <2.44 pg/mL | Member of IL-1 family; stimulates production of Th2 cytokines |
| IL-1β | 7.6 +/− 2.1 pg/mL | Crucial for host-defence responses to infection and injury |
| TNF-α # | <0.42 pg/mL | Produced during acute inflammation, responsible for a diverse range of signaling events |
|
| ||
| IL-6 | 19.3 +/− 5.4 ng/mL | Stimulates Th17 response |
| IL-8/CXCL8 | 6.7 +/− 2.2 ng/mL | Potent chemoattractant for neutrophils, stimulates angiogenesis |
| IL17A # | <0.06 pg/mL | Mediates protective innate immunity to pathogens, contributes to inflammatory disease |
| IL-23 | 4.3 +/− 1.5 pg/mL | Maintains Th17 response; stimulates epidermal hyperplasia |
| IFN-α2 # | <0.32 pg/mL | Type I IFN; Inhibits cell proliferation; activates immune system; anti-viral; anti-tumor |
| IFN-γ | 1.2 +/− 0.3 pg/mL | Type II IFN; stimulates innate and adaptive immunity |
| MCP-1/CCL2 | 15.4 +/− 4.8 ng/mL | Potant chemoatractant for monocytes and macrophages |
|
| ||
| Il-10 | 6.8 +/− 2.0 pg/mL | Inhibits production of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-3, TNF-α, GM-CSF by macrophages and Th1 cells |
| IL-12p70 | 2.9 +/− 0.8 pg/mL | Differentiation of naive T cells and Th1 cells; enhances cytotoxic activity of NK and CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes; is required to induce IL-10, acts as an anti-inflamatory during secondary responses |
Cytokine secretion between day 10 and day 11 (24 h) of unexposed reconstructed human skin with neopapillae (RhS-NP). Values are average +/− SEM of three replicates within a single repeat experiment used for cinnamaldehyde exposure. # cytokine secretion below the optimal detection limit of the assay before and after cinammaldehyde exposure. Detection limit of the assay is shown < indicates detection limit of assay.
Figure 6Cytokine release into culture supernatant after cinnamaldehyde exposure for 24 h starting at day 10 of dynamic flow culture. Pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β, inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1, inflammatory cytokines IL-23 and IFN-γ, and anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-12p70 are shown. Each dot represents a single RhS-NP. The horizontal line represents meanof three intra-experimental replicates. No significant differences were found with one-way ANOVA (Friedman test).