| Literature DB >> 35893731 |
Eleni Spanidi1, Sophia Athanasopoulou1, Angeliki Liakopoulou2, Angeliki Chaidou2, Sophia Hatziantoniou2, Konstantinos Gardikis1.
Abstract
Royal jelly is a yellowish-white substance with a gel texture that is secreted from the hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands of young worker bees. It consists mainly of water (50-56%), proteins (18%), carbohydrates (15%), lipids (3-6%), minerals (1.5%), and vitamins, and has many beneficial properties such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antidiabetic, immunomodulatory, and anti-aging. Royal jelly has been used since ancient times in traditional medicine, cosmetics and as a functional food due to its high nutritional value. The main bioactive substances are royalactin, and 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA). Other important bioactive molecules with antioxidant and photoprotective skin activity are polyphenols. However, they present difficulties in extraction and in use as they are unstable physicochemically, and a higher temperature causes color change and component degradation. In the present study, a new encapsulation and delivery system consisting of liposomes and cyclodextrins incorporating royal jelly has been developed. The new delivery system aims to the elimination of the stability disadvantages of royal jelly's sensitive component 10-HDA, but also to the controlled release of its ingredients and, more particularly, 10-HDA, for an enhanced bioactivity in cosmeceutical applications.Entities:
Keywords: 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA); controlled release; liposome; polyphenols; royal jelly
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893731 PMCID: PMC9332036 DOI: 10.3390/ph15080907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Stability test TPC: Total Phenolic Compounds (±SD), of RJDS and RJL.
| Time | Parameters | RJDS TPC (μg GA/mL) ± SD | RJL TPC (μg GA/mL) ± SD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 354 a | ± | 15 | 150 | ± | 15 | ||
| 24th week | 25 °C | 306 c | ± | 16 | 135 | ± | 126 |
| 6 °C | 308 b | ± | 8 | 147 | ± | 11 | |
| 38 °C | 193 a–d | ± | 34 | 29 | ± | 101 | |
| UV | 282 d | ± | 17 | 100.5 | ± | 62 | |
The values with the same letter as superscript (a–d) shows statistically significant difference, p ≤ 0.001.
Stability test for 10-HDA: 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (±SD), of RJDS versus pure royal jelly.
| Time | Parameters | RJDS (ppm) ± SD | Pure Royal Jelly (ppm) ± SD | RJL (ppm) ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1142 a, b, e, f | ± | 107 | 1198 a | ± | 49 | 317 | ± | 14 | ||
| 24th week | 25°C | 96 e–l | ± | 115 | 615 d, p | ± | 127 | N.D. | ||
| 6°C | 962 c, f–i | ± | 148 | 893 c, j, m, p, o | ± | 18 | N.D. | |||
| 38°C | 816 g, k, n, o | ± | 102 | 550 p, q | ± | 35 | N.D. | |||
| UV | 949 b, h, l, m, n | ± | 64 | 447 d, q | ± | 16 | N.D. | |||
The values with the same letter as superscript (a–q), shows not statistically significant difference, p ≤ 0.001.
Hydrodynamic diameter, polydispersity index and ζ-potential of the system at day 1 and after 1 month at various temperatures.
| System | Z-Average Diameter (nm) ± SD | PI ± SD | ζ-Pot (mV) ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RJDS day 0 | 301 a | ± | 33 | 0.399 d | ± | 0.044 | −17 | ± | 4.0 |
| RJDS 6 °C week 4 | 308 b | ± | 45 | 0.251 a | ± | 0.065 | −19 | ± | 5.2 |
| RJDS 25 °C week 4 | 449 | ± | 101 | 0.404 e | ± | 0.063 | −20 | ± | 3.9 |
| RJDS 38 °C week 4 | 605 a, b | ± | 88 | 0.710 a–e | ± | 0.105 | −18 | ± | 3.8 |
| RJDS 6 °C week 8 | 428 | ± | 95 | 0.341 c | ± | 0.115 | −19 | ± | 4.2 |
| RJDS 6 °C week 24 | 508 | ± | 99 | 0.299 s b | ± | 0.112 | −25 | ± | 5.9 |
Values with the same letter as superscript (a–e) shows statistically significant difference, p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1In vitro release of 10-hydroxydecenoic acid (10-HDA) of RJDS for time 0 to 8 h. The results are shown as the mean ±SD of three experiments.
Figure 2Results from in cellulo assays in NHDF cells. (a) Cell proliferation results based on MTT assay for untreated NHDF cells (N/T) and NHDF cells treated with different concentrations of RJDS diluted in the cell-culture medium (0.01%, 0.05%, 0.1% v/v). Value for untreated cells was arbitrarily set to 100% * p < 0.05 indicates groups significantly different from the control (ANOVA test—Dunett multiple comparisons test). (b) Relative gene expression levels for Col1A1, Col3A1, DCN, NFKB1, CLDN, CSTA and VEGF expressed as a fold change ± SEM compared to the control NHDF cells and using GADPH as internal reference gene. The experimental conditions were control (untreated NHDF cells—N/T) and cells treated with RJDS dissolved in cell culture medium in the percentage of 0.1% v/v). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 indicates groups of significantly different from the control (ANOVA). The data correspond to the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.
Figure 3Profile of penetration of (a) RJDS, (b) RJL and (c) royal jelly in stratum corneum (SC) after application on the skin of healthy volunteers.