| Literature DB >> 35893652 |
Maria M Said1,2, Delfina R Msanga3, Conjester I Mtemisika2, Vitus Silago2, Mariam M Mirambo2, Stephen E Mshana2.
Abstract
Rectal carriage of extended spectrum β-lactamase-lactose fermenters (ESBL-LF) is the major risk factor for the development of subsequent endogenous infections. This study determined the patterns and factors associated with the rectal carriage of ESBL-LF among children with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) attending clinics at different health care facilities in the city of Mwanza, Tanzania. A cross-sectional study was conducted among children living with HIV (n = 236), DM (n = 42) and SCD (n = 126) between July and September 2021. Socio-demographic and clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Rectal swabs/stool samples were collected and processed to detect the rectal carriage of ESBL-LF following laboratory standard operating procedures (SOPs). Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using STATA 13.0. The overall prevalence of ESBL-LF carriage was 94/404 (23.3%). Significantly higher resistance was observed to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline among Enterobacteriaceae isolated from HIV infected children than in non-HIV infected children (p < 0.05). The commonest ESBL allele 45/62 (72.6%) detected was blaCTX-M. Generally, a parent's low education level was found to be associated with ESBL-LF colonization among children living with HIV; (OR 4.60 [95%CI] [1.04-20], p = 0.044). A higher proportion of ESBL-LF from DM 10/10 (100%) carried ESBL genes than ESBL-LF from HIV 37/56 (66.1%) and SCD 15/28 (53.6%), p = 0.02. There is a need to collect more data regarding trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) prophylaxis and antibiotic resistance to guide the decision of providing SXT prophylaxis in HIV-infected children especially at this time, when testing and treatment is carried out.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae complex; children; colonization; extended spectrum beta-lactamase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35893652 PMCID: PMC9332460 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7080144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Infect Dis ISSN: 2414-6366
List of primers used in multiplex PCR.
| Gene | Sequence | Amplicon Size | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5′-ATGCGTATATTCGCCTGTG-3′ | 747 | [ | |
| 5′-TCGCCGATACACTATTCTCAGAATGA-3′ | 445 | ||
| 5′-ATGTGCAGYACCAGTAARGTKATGGC- 3′ | 593 |
Social demographic and clinical characteristics.
| Variables | HIV ( | DM ( | SCD ( | Overall ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median [IQR] age in years ( | 4 (2–8) | 10 (8–13) | 7 (4–10) | 6 (3–9) | ||
| Sex ( | Male | 122 (51.7%) | 18 (42.9%) | 77 (61.1%) | 217 (53.7%) | 0.076 |
| Female | 114 (48.3%) | 24 (57.1%) | 49 (38.9%) | 187 (46.3%) | ||
| Location ( | Urban | 209 (88.6%) | 28 (66.7%) | 115 (91.3%) | 352 (87.1%) | 0.000 |
| Rural | 27 (11.4%) | 14 (33.3%) | 11 (8.7%) | 52 (12.9%) | ||
| Parent education ( | Primary | 175 (74.2%) | 26 (61.9%) | 60 (64.6%) | 261 (64.6) | <0.001 |
| Secondary | 61 (25.8%) | 16 (38.1%) | 66 (52.4%) | 143 (35.4%) | ||
| Parent occupation ( | Employed | 35 (14.8%) | 26 (61.9%) | 54 (42.9%) | 115 (28.5%) | |
| Unemployed | 201 (85.2%) | 16 (38.1%) | 72 (57.1%) | 289 (71.5%) | <0.001 | |
| History of fever ( | Yes | 32 (27.8%) | 6 (37.5%) | 53 (42.1%) | 91 (35.4%) | 0.069 |
| No | 83 (72.2%) | 10 (62.5%) | 73 (57.9%) | 166 (64.6%) | ||
| History of admission past 3-month ( | Yes | 3 (2.5%) | 7 (16.7%) | 30 (23.8%) | 40 (13.84%) | <0.001 |
| No | 118 (97.5%) | 35 (83.3%) | 96 (76.2%) | 249 (86.0%) | ||
| Relative history of admission ( | Yes | 30 (12.7%) | 4 (25.0%) | 20 (16.0%) | 54 (14.3%) | |
| No | 206 (87.3%) | 12 (75.0%) | 105 (84.0%) | 323 (85.7%) | 0.321 | |
| ** Current antibiotic ( | Yes | 25 (10.5%) | 8 (19.1%) | 52 (41.3%) | 85 (21.1%) | <0.001 |
| No | 211 (89.5%) | 34 (80.9%) | 74 (58.7%) | 319 (78.9%) | ||
| History of antibiotic Past 3-month ( | Yes | 44 (18.6%) | 9 (21.4%) | 56 (44.4%) | 109 (27.0%) | <0.001 |
| No | 192 (81.4%) | 33 (78.6%) | 70 (55.6%) | 295 (73.0%) | ||
| Median [IQR] members in household | 5 (5–7) | 6 (5–7) | 5 (4–7) | 5 (4–7) | 0.001 | |
| Type of toilet ( | Modern | 199 (84.3%) | 14 (87.5%) | 119 (94.4%) | 332 (87.8) | |
| Pit | 37 (15.7%) | 2 (12.5%) | 7 (5.6%) | 46 (12.2%) | 0.0019 | |
| Is the child on Pen V prophylaxis, SCD ( | Yes | NA | NA | 43 (34.1%) | ||
| No | NA | NA | 83 (65.9%) | |||
| Is the child on SXT prophylaxis, HIV ( | Yes | 57 (24.2%) | NA | NA | ||
| No | 179 (75.8%) | NA | NA | |||
* two-by-two table was used to calculate p-value; ** SXT not included in HIV infected children.
Antibiotics resistance patterns by isolates source.
| DRUG | HIV ( | DM ( | SCD ( | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SXT | 149 (85.1) | 10 (66.7) | 82 (75.2) | 241 (80) | 0.045 |
| AMP | 158 (90.3) | 9 (60.0) | 95 (87.2) | 262 (87.6) | 0.003 |
| TET | 128 (73.1) | 5 (33.3) | 72 (66.1) | 205 (68.5) | 0.005 |
| CN | 40 (22.9) | 0 (0.00) | 27 (24.8) | 67 (22.4) | 0.095 |
| AK | 21 (12.0) | 0 (0.00) | 12 (11.0) | 33 (11.0) | 0.363 |
| CIP | 88 (50.3) | 5 (33.3) | 53 (48.6) | 146 (48.8) | 0.451 |
| MEM | 18 (10.3) | 3 (20.0) | 8 (7.3) | 39 (9.7) | 0.240 |
| CAZ | 41 (23.4) | 4 (26.7) | 27 (24.7) | 72 (24.0) | 0.946 |
| CRO | 50 (28.6) | 5 (33.3) | 32 (29.4) | 87 (29.1) | 0.924 |
CIP: Ciprofloxacin, AMP: Ampicillin, MEM: Meropenem, TET: Tetracycline, CAZ: Ceftazidime, SXT: Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, CN: Gentamicin, CRO: Ceftriaxone, AK: Amikacin.
Figure 1Gel image showing: L = DNA ladder 100 bp; Lanes 1–12 = PCR products; Lane 13 = positive control; and Lane 14 = negative control.
The proportions and distributions of ESBL genes among different groups of participants.
| ESBL Gene | DM (10), | HIV(56), | SCD(28), | Total(94), |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7 (70) | 27 (48.2.) | 11 (39.3) | 45 (47.9) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (1.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.1) |
|
| 2 (20) | 4 (7.1) | 1 (3.6) | 7 (7.4) |
|
| 0 (0) | 4 (7.1) | 2 (7.2) | 6 (6.4 |
|
| 1 (10) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (3.2) | 3 (3.2) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 19(33.9) | 13 (46.4) | 32(34.0) |
| Total positive | 10 (100) | 37 (66.1) | 15 (53.6) | 62 (65.9) |
Factors associated with ESBL-LF colonization among HIV children and SCD.
| Variables | ESBL Colonization | Univariate Logistic Analysis | Multivariate Logistic Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | OR [95%CI] | OR [95%CI] | ||||
| ESBL colonization among HIV children | ||||||
| Age | 5 [4–6] | 1.6 [0.9–1.113] | 0.9160 | |||
| Sex | Female (114) | 22 (19.39) | ||||
| Male (122) | 34 (27.87) | 1.6 [0.87–2.97) | 0.122 | 1.4 [0.78–2.76] | 0.253 | |
| Residence | Urban (209) | 52 (24.88) | 1.9 [0.62–5.7] | 0.247 | ||
| Rural (27) | 4 (14.81) | 1 | ||||
| Parent/Guardian Education level | Primary (175) | 47 (26.86) | 2.1 [0.9–4.6] | 0.056 | 4.60 [1.04–20] | 0.004 |
| Secondary (61) | 9 (14.75) | 1 | ||||
| Child on SXT | Yes (179) | 49 (27.37) | 2.6 [1.14–6.30] | 0.020 | 1.7 [0.6–4.67] | 0.253 |
| No (57) | 7 (12.28) | 1 | ||||
| ESBL colonization among SCD children | ||||||
| Age | 6.5 [10.5–3.5] | 0.97 [0.87–1.09] | 0.678 | |||
| Parent education level | Secondary (60) | 6 (10) | 1 | |||
| Primary (66) | 22 (33.33) | 4.5 [1.69–12.2] | 0.002 | 5 [1.54–11.3] | 0.006 | |
| Relative history of | Yes (20) | 8 (40.00) | 2.86 [1.0–7.9] | 0.037 | 2.43 [0.8–7.3] | 0.116 |
| No (106) | 20 (18.87) | 1 | ||||
| Source of antibiotic | Hospital (21) | 2 (9.52) | 0.17 [0.33–0.88] | 0.024 | 1.1 [0.45–2.8] | 0.768 |
| Pharmacy (29) | 11 (37.93) | 1 | ||||
Factors associated with ESBL-LF colonization among DM children.
| VARIABLES | ESBL-PE CARRIAGE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POS | NEG | |||
| Age | 10 [7–12] | 11 [8–13] | 0.254 | |
| SEX | Female | 3 (12.50) | 21 (87.50) | |
| Male | 7 (38.89) | 11 (61.11) | 0.047 | |
| Residence | Urban | 1 (28.57) | 20 (71.43) | |
| Rural | 2 (14.29) | 12 (85.71) | 0.306 | |
| Parent education | Primary | 2 (12.50) | 14 (87.50) | |
| Sec | 8 (30.77) | 18 (69.23) | 0.177 | |
| Parent occupation | Employed | 2 (7.69) | 24 (92.31) | |
| Unemployed | 8 (50.00) | 8 (50.00) | 0.002 | |
| History fever | Yes | 3 (50.00) | 3 (50.00) | 0.424 |
| No | 3 (30.00) | 7 (70.00) | ||
| History of Antibiotic | Yes | 3 (50.00) | 3 (50.50) | |
| No | 29 (80.56) | 7 (19.44) | 0.104 | |
| Current antibiotic use | Yes | 3 (37.50) | 5 (62.50) | 0.31 |
| No | 7 (20.59) | 27 (79.41) | ||
| Past history of admission | Yes | 5 (71.43) | 2 (28.57) | 0.001 |
| No | 5 (14.25) | 20 (85.71) | ||
| Relative history of Admission | Yes | 2 (50.00) | 2 (50.00) | 0.551 |
| No | 4 (33.33) | 8 (66.67) | ||
| Insulin | Yes | 32 (76.19) | 10 (23.81) | |
| Source | Hospital | 3 (50.00) | 3 (50.00) | |
| Pharmacy | 0 (0.00) | 4 (100.00) | ||
* two-by-two table was used to calculate p-value.