| Literature DB >> 35892804 |
Zhong Wang1,2,3,4, Qifang Jin1,2,3,4, Qin Li1,2,3,4, Xingchang Ou1,2,3,4, Shi Li1,2,3,4, Zhonghua Liu1,2,3,4, Jian'an Huang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
"Golden flower" fungi in dark tea are beneficial to human health. The rapid identification method of "golden flower" fungi can verify the quality of dark tea products and ensure food safety. In this study, 6 strains were isolated from Liupao tea. They were respectively identified as A. cristatus, A. chevalieri, and A. pseudoglaucus. A. pseudoglaucus was reported as Liupao tea "golden flower" fungus for the first time. It was found that the ITS and BenA sequences of A. cristatus and A. chevalieri were highly conserved. It is difficult to clearly distinguish these closely related species by ITS sequencing. To rapidly identify species, multiplex PCR species-specific primers were designed based on orphan genes screened by comparative genomics analysis. Multiplex PCR results showed that orphan genes were specific and effective for the identification of A. cristatus and A. chevalieri isolated from Liupao tea and Fu brick tea. We confirmed that orphan genes can be used for identification of closely related Aspergillus species. Validation showed that the method is convenient, rapid, robust, sequencing-free, and economical. This promising method will be greatly beneficial to the dark tea processing industry and consumers.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; Liupao tea; multiplex PCR; orphan genes; rapid identification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892804 PMCID: PMC9332452 DOI: 10.3390/foods11152217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Amplification of rDNA-ITS-region of Aspergillus spp. colonies. Lane M: 2000 bp ladder, lanes 1–13: colonies incubated at 95 °C for 10 min, lanes 14–16: colonies unincubated, lane 17: negative control, lanes 18–20: DNA extracted from A. cristatus, A. chevalieri, and A. pseudoglaucus were used as positive controls.
“Golden flower” Fungi identified and tea samples information.
| ID | Fungi Isolated | Tea Sample | District | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Guangxi Wuzhou Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| L2 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Guangxi Wuzhou Maosheng Tea Co., Ltd. |
| L3 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Guangxi Wuzhou Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| L4 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Guangxi Wuzhou Maosheng Tea Co., Ltd. |
| L5 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Wuzhou Chinatea Tea Co., Ltd. |
| L6 |
| Liupao tea | Guangxi | Wuzhou Chinatea Tea Co., Ltd. |
| H1 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Hunan Yiqingyuan Tea Co., Ltd. |
| H2 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Yiyang Guanlongyu Black Tea Development Co., Ltd. |
| H3 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Chinatea Hunan Anhua First Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| H4 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Hunan Baishaxi Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| H5 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Yiyang Guanlongyu Black Tea Development Co., Ltd. |
| H6 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Hunan Yiyang Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| H7 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Hunan Yiyang Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| H8 |
| Fu brick tea | Hunan | Hunan Yiyang Tea Factory Co., Ltd. |
| S1 |
| Fu brick tea | Shaanxi | Xianyang Jingwei Fucha Tea Co., Ltd. |
| Z1 |
| Fu brick tea | Zhejiang | Zhejiang Wuyi Camel Jiulong Brick Tea Co., Ltd. |
| M1 | L2 + L3 | Liupao tea | Guangxi | Artificial microbial communities |
| M2 | L4 + L1 | Liupao tea | Guangxi | Artificial microbial communities |
Figure 2Neighbor-Joining phylogeny tree derived from Aspergillus spp. BenA sequences.
Primers designed in this study.
| Name | Sequence | Expected Amplification Length/bp | Assigned Set |
|---|---|---|---|
| for | |||
| aOP1F | TTCGGCGGTATAGACTTCGTAAGACA | 274 | 2 |
| aOP1R | GGTGACCAAGTAGTAGGCAGCATCT | ||
| aOP2F | CCTGTGAGGCTCTGGCGTAAGTATT | 349 | 1 |
| aOP2R | CTGCTCATCATCTTCCTGTCCACCA | ||
| aOP3F | AGATCGCTCCACGATTCTGCTCTG | 447 | 1 |
| aOP3R | TTGGTTGCCAGTCTGCTGATAGGAA | ||
| aOP4F | AACATGAACATCGACAGCCCACAAAG | 659 | 2 |
| aOP4R | GCATAGTCCTCCCGTCCAGTAAGC | ||
| for | |||
| iOP1F | CACCTGGAAGACCGACACCGAATC | 242 | 1 |
| iOP1R | TCATTGGCGAGTGGAAGGACAACAA | ||
| iOP2F | ATGTCTCCAACCTTGTCCAGCACTT | 383 | 2 |
| iOP2R | TGATGTATCTGAGTTCGGCGAGAGTG | ||
| iOP3F | ATCCGATGCCATTGTCTGTGTCTTG | 529 | 1 |
| iOP3R | GACCAGGCTATGGAACCTAACGAGAA | ||
| iOP4F | GTCTAACTGCCACTGCTCGAATATGC | 506 | 2 |
| iOP4R | TCACTGACACTCTGCGAACGATACTT | ||
Non-specific amplification of primers in e-PCR.
| Primer ID | Genome Source | Non-Specific Amplification Length/bp |
|---|---|---|
| aOP2 |
| 1,303,340 |
| aOP2 |
| 951,397 |
| aOP2 |
| 2,083,709 |
| aOP2 |
| 2,267,588 |
| aOP4 |
| 1,739,704 |
| iOP1 |
| 434,906 |
| iOP1 |
| 205,828 |
| iOP1 |
| 2,786,963 |
| iOP1 |
| 3,164,056 |
| iOP1 |
| 37,955 |
| iOP2 |
| 1,388,062 |
| iOP2 |
| 1,716,279 |
Figure 3Evaluation of specificity of primers based on orphan genes from Aspergillus spp. (a) Primers used in lane groups I-IV, respectively, are aOP1, aOP2, aOP3 and aOP4; (b) primers used in lanes groups I-IV respectively are iOP1, iOP2, iOP3, iOP4. Lane M: 2000 bp ladder, samples in lanes group, I-IV respectively, are A. chevalieri L1, L2 and H7 and A. cristatus L3, L4 and H6; (c) negative controls and positive controls for each pair of primers; thin dotted line, respectively, represents no template controls, bold dotted line represents negative controls, bold line represents positive controls, lanes 1–12 respectively, are primers aOP1, aOP2, aOP3 and aOP4 and for target A. chevalieri, lanes 13–24 respectively, are primers iOP1, iOP2, iOP3 and iOP4 for target A. cristatus.
Figure 4Multiplex PCR of Aspergillus strains. (a) Primer set 1 mixed aOP2, aOP3, iOP1 and iOP3; (b) primer set 2 mixed aOP1, aOP4, iOP2, and iOP4; lane M: 2000 bp ladder, lanes 1–2: A. chevalieri L1, L2, lanes 3–7: A. cristatus H1–H5, lane 8: A. cristatus H8, lane 9: A. cristatus S1, lane 10: A. cristatus Z1, lanes 11–12: A. cristatus L3–L4, lanes 13–14: artificial microbial communities M1–M2; (c) negative controls and positive controls for multiplex PCR, thin dotted line respectively are no template controls, bold line respectively are positive controls, lane 1: negative control for primer set 1, lane 2: A. chevalieri DNA was used as positive control for primer set 1, lane 3: A. cristatus DNA was used as positive control for primer set 1, lane 4: negative control for primer set 2, lane 5: A. chevalieri DNA was used as positive control for primers set 2, lane 6: A. cristatus DNA was used as positive control for primer set 2. (d) Primers set S containing aOP4 and iOP2 for Aspergillus identification; lane M: 2000 bp ladder, lanes 1–3: A. chevalieri L1, L2, H7, lanes 4–6: A. cristatus L3, L4, H6; (e) negative control and positive controls for aOP4 and iOP2 mixture amplification, lane 1: using A. chevalieri DNA as positive control, lane 2: using A. cristatus DNA as positive control, lane 3: negative control. (f) tea samples direct amplification, lanes M: 2000 bp ladder, lanes 1–2: using primer set S, lanes 3–4: using primer set 1, lanes 5–6: using primer set 2, lanes 1, 3, 5: tea sample containing A. chevalieri L1, lanes 2, 4, 6: tea sample containing A. cristatus L3.