| Literature DB >> 35892762 |
Dexin Ou1, Na Ling1, Xihao Wang1, Yanyan Zou1, Jingjing Dong1, Danfeng Zhang1, Yizhong Shen1, Yingwang Ye1.
Abstract
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is a kind of extensively utilized probiotic species, which plays a critical role in the prevention of pathogenic bacteria and development of functional probiotics. Our group previously isolated one Lactiplantibacillus from Jiang Shui, a traditional Chinese fermented vegetable, which remarkably inhibited the growth of Aspergillus flavus. Herein, the safety of this isolate was assessed to ensure its application feasibility in food industry. Firstly, the phenotypic analyses including tolerance to low pH and bile salt, aggregation ability, and hemolytic activity detection, indicated the isolate could survive and colonize in the gastrointestinal tract, without hemolysin activity. The susceptibilities of the isolate to eight antibiotics and the absence of most resistance genes were demonstrated by agar disk diffusion and PCR, respectively. Furthermore, no mortality or toxicity was observed in mice by in vivo tests using gross autopsy, hematology, serum biochemistry, and HE-staining. Taken together, this study demonstrated the safety of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WYH as a probiotic strain in terms of phenotypic analyses, absence of antimicrobial resistance and toxin-related genes, as well as mice toxicity test, while supported the prospect of applying isolate in suppression of fungal growth and mycotoxin biosynthesis.Entities:
Keywords: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum; probiotic; safety assessment; toxicity test
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892762 PMCID: PMC9332144 DOI: 10.3390/foods11152177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
List of primers used to detect the virulence genes.
| Gene | Primer Sequences (5′ to 3′) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 27F | AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG |
| 1492R | CGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT | |
|
| F | GTGGACAAAGGTACAACGAG |
| R | CGGTAAAGTTCGTCACACAC | |
|
| F | TTAGGTGAAGGGTTAGGTCC |
| R | GCAAACTCATTCCAGAAGCA | |
|
| F | CATTTGGTCTTATTGGATCG |
| R | ATTACACTTCCGATTTCGG | |
|
| F | TGGAACGCCAGAGAGGTATT |
| R | ACATAGACAAGCCGTTGACC | |
|
| F | CATARTTCCGATAATASMGCC |
| R | CGTSTTTAACTAAGTATSGY | |
|
| F | TTGCTCAGAGGAGCATGACG |
| R | TCGGGAAGTGCAATACCTGC | |
|
| F | TTATCTTCGGCGGTTGCTCG |
| R | GCCAATGTAATCAGGCTGTC | |
|
| F | TCGCGGTAGTCCCACCATTCGTT |
| R | AAATCATCGTTGACCTGCGTTAT | |
|
| F | CCAAGAGCAATAAGGGCATA |
| R | CACTATCATAACCACTACCG | |
|
| F | GCCGATGTGGATTGCGAAAA |
| R | GCTTGATCCCCAGTAAGTCA | |
|
| F | CTTGGTGATAACGGCAATTC |
| R | CCAATCGCAGATAGAAGGC | |
|
| F | ATCGTCAAGGGATTGAAACC |
| R | GGATCGTAGAACATATTGGC | |
|
| F | ATCCTTCGGCGCGATTTTG |
| R | GCAGCGCAATGACATTCTTG | |
|
| F | ACTGGCTTAATCAATTTGGG |
| R | GCCTTTCCGCCACCTCACCG | |
|
| F | CATARTTCCGATAATASMGCC |
| R | TTAGGTTATTGGGATAAGTTA | |
|
| F | CAMCGKCGKATTCTTTACGGAATG |
| R | TTRTTGATATCRCGBAGCATTTC | |
|
| F | GCYTCNGTATAACGCATMGCCG |
| R | GCYTCNGTATAACGCATMGCCG | |
|
| F | CATTTAACGACGAAACTGGC |
| R | GGAACATCTGTGGTATGGCG | |
|
| F | CAAACCCGTATTCCACGATT |
| R | ATCTTTGAAATCGGCTCAGG |
The presence of antibiotic genes was highlighted in colors.
Figure 1Absorbance of L. plantarum after incubation for 16 h in MRS broth at 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.8% bile salts (A) and pH 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 (B). (C) The absorbance of L. plantarum after incubation in different bile salts concentrations of the isolate after pre-exposure to low pH. (D) Auto-aggregation and co-aggregation with S. aureus and E. coli as determined after various times of incubation durations at 37 °C. (E) Hemolytic activity. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Strains antibiotic susceptibility test.
| Antibiotic | Inhibition Zone (mm) a | CLSI Classification b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Susceptible Zone (mm) | S-I-R | |
| TE (30 μg) | 18.24 ± 0.26 | 21.95 ± 0.09 | ≥19 | I |
| MEM (10 μg) | 29.67 ± 0.31 | 20.74 ± 0.12 | ≥16 | S |
| AML (10 μg) | 33.61 ± 0.23 | 17.45 ± 0.05 | ≥18 | S |
| AMP (10 μg) | NA | 16.12 ± 0.12 | ≥19 | R |
| VA (30 μg) | NA | NA | ≥15 | R |
| S (10 μg) | NA | 19.21 ± 0.05 | ≥14 | R |
| CIP (5 μg) | NA | 25.25 ± 0.18 | ≥21 | R |
| K (30 μg) | 10.59 ± 0.10 | 7.82 ± 0.01 | ≥18 | S |
| C (30 μg) | 20.61 ± 0.09 | 23.72 ± 0.13 | ≥18 | S |
| GEN (10 μg) | 17.13 ± 0.14 | 14.35 ± 0.14 | ≥10 | S |
| ERM (15 μg) | 27.96 ± 0.06 | NA | ≥23 | S |
| NEO (10 μg) | 17.22 ± 0.16 | 14.80 ± 0.02 | ≥16 | S |
| AZI (15 μg) | 19.15 ± 0.07 | 9.00 ± 0.08 | ≥18 | S |
a Values are expressed as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. NA means nonexistent circle. b Standard interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests of enterococci with disc diffusion method in accordance with CLSI standards: S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant. TE: tetracycline, MEM: meropenem, AML: amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, AMP: ampicillin, VA: vancomycin, S: streptomycin, CIP: ciprofloxacin, K: kanamycin, C: chloramphenicol, GEN: gentamicin, ERM: erythromycin, AZI: azithromycin, NEO: neomycin.
Figure 2The changes in viscera index and body weight in mice administered with L. plantarum WYH by oral gavage for acute oral toxicity (A,B) and 28-day repeated toxicity (C,D). (C) a–d, respectively, represented normal saline (0), low concentration (108), medium concentration (109), and high concentration (1010) feeding groups of male mice. Additionally, e–h had the same means in the female mice group. * p < 0.05.
Hematological parameters in mice for acute oral toxicity.
| Hematological Parameters | 0 | 1011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |
| White blood cells (109/L) | 3.69 ± 0.16 | 3.94 ± 0.06 | 4.20 ± 0.28 | 4.72 ± 0.39 |
| Neutrophils (109/L) | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.12 |
| Lymphocytes (109/L) | 3.27 ± 0.23 | 3.67 ± 0.07 | 3.90 ± 0.46 | 4.26 ± 0.30 |
| Monocytes (109/L) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Eosinophilic (109/L) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Basophilic (109/L) | 0.01 ± 0.005 | 0.02 ± 0.000 | 0.02 ± 0.010 | 0.02 ± 0.010 |
| Neutrophil percentage (%) | 11.23 ± 4.58 | 6.25 ± 0.64 | 7.60 ± 5.78 | 9.18 ± 2.32 |
| Lymphocytes percentage (%) | 88.25 ± 4.65 | 93.20 ± 0.56 | 91.95 ± 5.79 | 90.38 ± 2.34 |
| Monocytes percentage (%) | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.06 |
| Eosinophilic percentage (%) | ND | 0.030 ± 0.030 | ND | ND |
| Basophilic percentage (%) | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.43 ± 0.13 | 0.35 ± 0.06 |
| Red blood cells (109/L) | 7.99 ± 1.23 | 10.49 ± 0.21 | 9.27 ± 0.84 | 9.92 ± 0.38 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 151.00 ± 9.43 | 160.75 ± 4.27 | 157.25 ± 4.55 | 159.50 ± 3.40 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 38.78 ± 5.49 | 49.08 ± 1.33 | 45.75 ± 4.02 | 47.73 ± 0.57 |
| Mean corpuscular volume (fl) | 48.93 ± 0.82 | 46.73 ± 0.42 | 49.40 ± 0.60 | 48.25 ± 1.43 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg) | 15.88 ± 0.34 | 15.33 ± 0.18 | 17.33 ± 1.41 | 16.13 ± 0.34 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (g/L) | 324.50 ± 1.96 | 327.75 ± 2.53 | 350.25 ± 25.96 | 334.25 ± 3.35 |
| Red blood cell distribution width (SD) | 14.20 ± 0.090 | 15.30 ± 0.45 | 13.95 ± 0.33 | 13.45 ± 0.39 |
| Red blood cell volume distribution width (CV) | 26.98 ± 0.56 | 27.83 ± 1.02 | 26.80 ± 0.72 | 25.20 ± 0.91 * |
| Platelets (109/L) | 401.25 ± 65.39 | 320.25 ± 160.97 | 365.00 ± 203.01 | 403.00 ± 198.78 |
| Mean platelet volume (fl) | 7.13 ± 0.23 | 22.58 ± 15.81 | 7.20 ± 0.19 | 6.48 ± 0.19 |
| Platelet distribution width (%) | 15 ± 0.23 | 14.78 ± 0.11 | 14.85 ± 0.06 | 14.90 ± 0.11 |
| Plateletcrit (%) | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.26 ± 0.09 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.12 |
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). A significant correlation was noted by * p < 0.05 compared with controls for same-sex. ND means not detected.
Figure 3Light micrographs of the sections of the liver, kidney, and intestine of control mice, and mice have given a high concentration of 1011 CFU/mL of L. plantarum WYH. (×200).
Hematological parameters and serum biochemistry in mice for 28-day repeated toxicity.
| NC | LDG | MDG | HDG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematological parameters | ||||
| White blood cells (109/L) | 6.98 ± 0.70 | 8.88 ± 0.61 | 5.26 ± 0.24 | 5.72 ± 0.61 |
| Neutrophils (109/L) | 1.26 ± 0.28 | 1.18 ± 0.49 | 0.61 ± 0.22 | 0.68 ± 0.23 |
| Lymphocytes (109/L) | 5.65 ± 0.62 | 8.36 ± 0.78 | 4.34 ± 0.59 | 7.50 ± 2.74 |
| Monocytes (109/L) | 0.030 ± 0.010 | 0.030 ± 0.010 | 0.010 ± 0.00 | 0.010 ± 0.010 |
| Eosinophilic (109/L) | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Basophilic (109/L) | 0.050 ± 0.010 | 0.070 ± 0.020 | 0.040 ± 0.010 | 0.040 ± 0.010 |
| Neutrophil percentage (%) | 17.95 ± 4.12 | 10.93 ± 3.37 | 13.55 ± 5.34 | 8.88 ± 2.62 |
| Lymphocytes percentage (%) | 80.95 ± 4.06 | 88.05 ± 3.14 | 85.55 ± 5.26 | 90.48 ± 2.60 |
| Monocytes percentage (%) | 0.40 ± 0.15 | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.15 ± 0.030 | 0.15 ± 0.050 |
| Eosinophilic percentage (%) | 0.030 ± 0.030 | ND | ND | ND |
| Basophilic percentage (%) | 0.68 ± 0.12 | 0.75 ± 0.27 | 0.75 ± 0.18 | 0.50 ± 0.070 |
| Red blood cells (109/L) | 9.68 ± 0.14 | 9.89 ± 0.18 | 8.44 ± 0.99 | 9.66 ± 0.20 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 144.50 ± 1.32 | 147.25 ± 3.28 | 129.75 ± 15.94 | 143.25 ± 1.55 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 45.33 ± 0.54 | 46.85 ± 1.09 | 41.63 ± 4.85 | 46.00 ± 0.72 |
| Mean corpuscular volume (fl) | 46.80 ± 0.64 | 47.38 ± 0.66 | 49.38 ± 0.050 | 47.60 ± 0.39 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobi (pg) | 14.93 ± 0.21 | 14.90 ± 0.070 | 15.35 ± 0.22 | 14.85 ± 0.18 |
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (g/L) | 319.25 ± 1.80 | 314.25 ± 4.33 | 310.75 ± 4.31 | 311.50 ± 1.66 |
| Red blood cell distribution width (SD) | 17.08 ± 0.86 | 18.70 ± 1.50 | 16.88 ± 0.65 | 17.08 ± 0.57 |
| Red blood cell volume distribution width (CV) | 33.00 ± 1.32 | 36.70 ± 3.26 | 33.88 ± 1.32 | 33.60 ± 1.33 |
| Platelets (109/L) | 885.75 ± 98.30 | 626.25 ± 126.72 | 614.75 ± 121.37 | 1058.25 ± 110.94 |
| Mean platelet volume (fl) | 5.63 ± 0.090 | 5.88 ± 0.24 | 6.20 ± 0.11 | 5.68 ± 0.14 |
| Platelet distribution width (%) | 15.20 ± 0.070 | 15.08 ± 0.13 | 15.28 ± 0.060 | 15.15 ± 0.030 |
| Plateletcrit (%) | 0.50 ± 0.050 | 0.36 ± 0.070 | 0.38 ± 0.080 | 0.60 ± 0.050 |
| Serum biochemistry | ||||
| ALT (U/L) | 61.68 ± 5.97 | 74.65 ± 2.77 | 64.14 ± 6.65 | 61.08 ± 3.48 |
| AST (U/L) | 139.28 ± 5.76 | 163.15 ± 14.68 | 151.10 ± 3.40 | 139.90 ± 10.12 |
| Glu (mmol/L) | 6.35 ± 0.49 | 6.05 ± 0.345 | 6.95 ± 0.50 | 7.05 ± 0.41 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 18.68 ± 0.61 | 20.76 ± 1.04 | 18.26 ± 2.38 | 20.51 ± 1.34 |
| CREA (μmol/L) | 26.29 ± 1.09 | 21.64 ± 0.14 | 24.19 ± 2.39 | 26.08 ± 1.89 |
| CHO (mmol/L) | 2.26 ± 0.12 | 2.33 ± 0.17 | 2.65 ± 0.12 | 2.40 ± 0.085 |
Each value was expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 4). p < 0.05. ND means not detected. A significant correlation was compared with the NC group (fed with saline).
Figure 4Tissue samples were collected for HE staining and pathological analysis was conducted. Liver, kidney, and intestine sections in mice with different concentrations of strain for 28-days repeated toxicity. The NC was fed with the saline and LDG, MDG, and HDG were fed with the saline containing 108, 109, and 1010 CFU/mL of isolate, respectively. (×200).