Literature DB >> 29584914

Antimicrobial resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial probiotic products used in cattle and swine.

Raghavendra G Amachawadi1, Felicia Giok2, Xiaorong Shi2, Jose Soto3, Sanjeev K Narayanan2, Mike D Tokach3, Mike D Apley1, T G Nagaraja2.   

Abstract

Probiotics, an antibiotic alternative, are widely used as feed additives for performance benefits in cattle and swine production systems. Among bacterial species contained in probiotics, Enterococcus faecium is common. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly multidrug resistance, is a common trait among enterococci because of their propensity to acquire resistance and horizontally transfer AMR genes. Also, E. faecium is an opportunistic pathogen, and in the United States, it is the second most common nosocomial pathogen. There has been no published study on AMR and virulence potential in E. faecium contained in probiotic products used in cattle and swine in the United States. Therefore, our objectives were to determine phenotypic susceptibilities or resistance to antimicrobials, virulence genes (asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl) and assess genetic diversity of E. faecium isolated from commercial products. Twenty-two commercially available E. faecium-based probiotic products used in cattle (n = 13) and swine (n = 9) were procured and E. faecium was isolated and species confirmed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations was done by micro-broth dilution method using National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring Systems Gram-positive Sensititre panel plate (CMV3AGPF), and categorization of strains as susceptible or resistant was as per Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute's guidelines. E. faecium strains from 7 products (3 for swine and 4 for cattle) were pan-susceptible to the 16 antimicrobials tested. Strains from 15 products (6 for swine and 9 for cattle) exhibited resistance to at least one antimicrobial and a high proportion of strains was resistant to lincomycin (10/22), followed by tetracycline (4/22), daptomycin (4/22), ciprofloxacin (4/22), kanamycin (3/22), and penicillin (2/22). Four strains were multidrug resistant, with resistant phenotypes ranging from 3 to 6 antimicrobials or class. None of the E. faecium strains were positive for any of the virulence genes tested. The clonal relationships among the 22 E. faecium strains were determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing. A total of 10 PFGE patterns were observed with 22 strains and a few of the strains from different probiotic products had identical (100% Dice similarity) PFGE patterns. In conclusion, the E. faecium strains in a few commercial probiotics exhibited AMR to medically-important antimicrobials, but none contained virulence genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29584914      PMCID: PMC6093546          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  37 in total

Review 1.  The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance.

Authors:  Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  In vitro susceptibility of Enterococcus faecium isolated from food to growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics.

Authors:  P Butaye; K Van Damme; L A Devriese; L Van Damme; M Bael; S Lauwers; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-03-25       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 3.  Horizontal gene transfer and the genomics of enterococcal antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Kelli L Palmer; Veronica N Kos; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 7.934

4.  Evaluation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a tool for determining the degree of genetic relatedness between strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  Margaret A Davis; Dale D Hancock; Thomas E Besser; Douglas R Call
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Pyrosequencing-based comparative genome analysis of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecium and identification of a large transferable pathogenicity island.

Authors:  Willem van Schaik; Janetta Top; David R Riley; Jos Boekhorst; Joyce E P Vrijenhoek; Claudia M E Schapendonk; Antoni P A Hendrickx; Isaäc J Nijman; Marc J M Bonten; Hervé Tettelin; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Characterisation and transferability of antibiotic resistance genes from lactic acid bacteria isolated from Irish pork and beef abattoirs.

Authors:  Niamh Toomey; Declan Bolton; Séamus Fanning
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Development of a multiplex PCR for the detection of asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl genes in enterococci and survey for virulence determinants among European hospital isolates of Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Vanessa Vankerckhoven; Tim Van Autgaerden; Carl Vael; Christine Lammens; Sabine Chapelle; Rosaria Rossi; Daniela Jabes; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Analysis of Enterococcus faecalis isolates from intercontinental sources by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  J F Tomayko; B E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparative analysis of genetic diversity and incidence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance among enterococcal populations from raw fruit and vegetable foods, water and soil, and clinical samples.

Authors:  Hikmate Abriouel; Nabil Ben Omar; Antonio Cobo Molinos; Rosario Lucas López; Maria José Grande; Pilar Martínez-Viedma; Elena Ortega; Magdalena Martínez Cañamero; Antonio Galvez
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.277

10.  Pheromone killing of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecalis V583 by native commensal strains.

Authors:  Michael S Gilmore; Marcus Rauch; Matthew M Ramsey; Paul R Himes; Sriram Varahan; Janet M Manson; Francois Lebreton; Lynn Ernest Hancock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic.

Authors:  Abigail L Manson; Daria Van Tyne; Timothy J Straub; Sarah Clock; Michael Crupain; Urvashi Rangan; Michael S Gilmore; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Whole genome sequence analyses-based assessment of virulence potential and antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial swine and cattle probiotic products.

Authors:  Pragathi B Shridhar; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Mike Tokach; Isha Patel; Jayanthi Gangiredla; Mark Mammel; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Live yeast and yeast extracts with and without pharmacological levels of zinc on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jenna A Chance; Joel M DeRouchey; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Victor Ishengoma; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja; Robert D Goodband; Jason C Woodworth; Mike D Tokach; Hilda I Calderón; Qing Kang; Joseph A Loughmiller; Brian Hotze; Jordan T Gebhardt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach.

Authors:  John F Patience; Alejandro Ramirez
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Hayden E Williams; Mike D Tokach; Steve S Dritz; Jason C Woodworth; Joel M DeRouchey; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja; Robert D Goodband; John R Pluske; Kessinee Chitakasempornkul; Nora M Bello; Raghavendra G Amachawadi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Horizontal transfer of vanA between probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in fermented soybean meal and in digestive tract of growing pigs.

Authors:  Ning Li; Haitao Yu; Hongbin Liu; Yuming Wang; Junyan Zhou; Xi Ma; Zheng Wang; Chengtao Sun; Shiyan Qiao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-04-12

7.  Safety Assessment of One Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Isolated from the Traditional Chinese Fermented Vegetables-Jiangshui.

Authors:  Dexin Ou; Na Ling; Xihao Wang; Yanyan Zou; Jingjing Dong; Danfeng Zhang; Yizhong Shen; Yingwang Ye
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria deliberately introduced into the agro-food chain do not significantly increase the antimicrobial resistance gene pool.

Authors:  Vita Rozman; Petra Mohar Lorbeg; Primož Treven; Tomaž Accetto; Majda Golob; Irena Zdovc; Bojana Bogovič Matijašić
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

9.  Effects of Tylosin, a Direct-Fed Microbial and Feedlot Pen Environment on Phenotypic Resistance among Enterococci Isolated from Beef Cattle Feces.

Authors:  Sarah A Murray; Ashlyn C Holbert; Keri N Norman; Sara D Lawhon; Jason E Sawyer; Harvey M Scott
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14

10.  Dynamics of the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistome in commercial piglets during the weaning period.

Authors:  Prapat Suriyaphol; Jimmy Ka Ho Chiu; Nathamon Yimpring; Paiboon Tunsagool; Wuttichai Mhuantong; Rungtip Chuanchuen; Irina Bessarab; Rohan B H Williams; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Gunnaporn Suriyaphol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.