| Literature DB >> 35892114 |
Huei-Jhen Wen1,2, Shu-Hsin Liu3,4, Chia-Liang Tsai5.
Abstract
Background/Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic exercise; Event-related potential; Inhibitory control; Obesity; Resistance exercise
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892114 PMCID: PMC9287612 DOI: 10.1016/j.jesf.2022.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exerc Sci Fit ISSN: 1728-869X Impact factor: 3.465
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the experimental procedure.
Demographic characteristics of the participants.
| Characteristics | Control group (n = 16) | Obese group (n = 16) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 33.84 ± 7.05 | 33.95 ± 5.99 | 0.962 (−4.61, 4.83) |
| Height (cm) | 158.79 ± 5.68 | 159.88 ± 4.87 | 0.563 (−2.73, 4.91) |
| Weight (kg) | 74.94 ± 13.58 | 75.74 ± 11.11 | 0.855 (−8.15, 9.77) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.61 ± 4.31 | 29.50 ± 3.57 | 0.942 (−2.96, 2.75) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 112.31 ± 13.86 | 113.56 ± 12.23 | 0.789 (−8.19, 10.69) |
| DBP (mmHg) | 69.63 ± 9.41 | 75.00 ± 8.24 | 0.096 (−1.01, 11.76) |
| Resting HR (bpm) | 76.13 ± 8.85 | 73.00 ± 4.15 | 0.211 (−8.11, 1.86) |
| BDI-II | 7.63 ± 3.12 | 6.23 ± 3.59 | 0.257 (−3.85, 1.07) |
| MMSE | 29.13 ± 0.84 | 29.67 ± 0.72 | 0.072 (−0.05, 1.12) |
| Physical activity (kcal) | 1980.98 ± 469.23 | 1953.21 ± 296.68 | 0.846 (−318.44, 262.90) |
| Diet (kcal/day) | 1905.10 ± 558.73 | 2018.59 ± 579.98 | 0.420 (−266.42, 619.41) |
| Waist circum. (cm) | 85.78 ± 9.76 | 87.81 ± 9.95 | 0.565 (−5.09, 9.14) |
| Hip circum. (cm) | 108.02 ± 9.66 | 110.71 ± 7.55 | 0.388 (−3.57, 8.95) |
| Waist-Hip Ratio | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | 0.909 (−0.04, 0.03) |
BMI, body mass index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; HR: heart rate; bpm, beat per minute; BDI, Beck depression inventory; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; and PA, physical activity; circum.: Circumference. CI: Confidence intervals. Values are means ± SD. ∗p < 0.05.
Fig. 2The mean exercise intensity and heart rates for each session during the 12-week intervention in the exercise group.
Fig. 3Exercise program.
Fig. 4The mean ± SD of (a) ARs and (b) RTs of the EG and CG groups at pre- and post-test.
Fig. 5Grand averaged ERPs of P2, N2, and P3 waveforms under the congruent and incongruent conditions for two electrodes (Fz and Cz) for the exercise group (EG) and control group (CG) at pre- and post-test when performing the Stroop task.
The P3 amplitude of the participants at pre- and post-test.
| P3 amplitude | Difference between means (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG (n = 16) | CG (n = 16) | |||
| Pre-test | 2.59 ± 0.87 | 2.06 ± 1.15 | 0.52 (−0.21, 1.26) | 0.156 |
| Analysis | ||||
| Post-test | 3.49 ± 1.01 | 1.68 ± 1.09 | 1.82 (1.05, 2.58) | <0.001 |
| Change score | 0.91 ± 0.63 | −0.39 ± 1.12 | 1.29 (0.64, 1.95) | <0.001 |
| ANCOVA | 1.48 (0.85, 2.11) | <0.001 | ||
| (partial | ||||
Change score = Post-test - Pre-test.
The body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and muscular strength of the participants at pre- and post-test.
| Time point | Groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise group | Mean difference within group (95% CI) | Control group | Mean difference within group (95% CI) | |||
| Pre-test | Post-test | Pre-test | Post-test | |||
| Body weight (kg) | 75.74 ± 11.11 | 74.79 ± 11.03 | 0.106 (−0.23, 2.14) | 74.94 ± 13.58 | 75.08 ± 14.04 | 0.748 (−1.03, 0.76) |
| Total body fat percentage (%) | 41.01 ± 3.09 | 37.78 ± 2.60 | <0.001 (2.23, 4.22) | 43.24 ± 4.47 | 43.23 ± 4.35 | 0.973 (−0.38, 0.40) |
| Upper limbs fat percentage (%) | 48.25 ± 3.59 | 45.34 ± 4.55 | <0.001 (1.76, 4.05) | 45.94 ± 3.87 | 46.14 ± 3.38 | 0.582 (−0.97, 0.57) |
| Trunk fat percentage (%) | 41.53 ± 3.75 | 37.59 ± 3.32 | <0.001 (2.36, 5.52) | 44.67 ± 5.39 | 44.73 ± 5.20 | 0.880 (−0.90, 0.78) |
| Lower limbs fat percentage (%) | 41.55 ± 4.45 | 38.59 ± 3.59 | <0.001 (1.90, 4.04) | 42.52 ± 4.11 | 42.50 ± 4.22 | 0.950 (−0.60, 0.64) |
| Percentage lean mass (%) | 56.08 ± 2.96 | 59.22 ± 2.44 | <0.001 (−4.14, −2.14) | 55.02 ± 4.14 | 55.04 ± 4.05 | 0.868 (−0.39, 0.33) |
| Total lean body mass (kg) | 42.05 ± 5.44 | 43.24 ± 5.64 | 0.014 (−0.21, −0.28) | 40.91 ± 5.71 | 41.17 ± 5.94 | 0.321 (−0.80, 0.28) |
| Total fat mass (kg) | 31.08 ± 6.46 | 27.80 ± 5.47 | <0.001 (2.15, 4.41) | 31.80 ± 8.75 | 31.94 ± 8.65 | 0.484 (−0.57, 0.28) |
| Estimated V̇O2max (ml/kg/min) | 23.66 ± 3.03 | 28.59 ± 4.92 | <0.001 (−7.31, −2.56) | 23.83 ± 6.37 | 23.30 ± 6.99 | 0.504 (−1.11, 2.16) |
| Leg extension 1 repetition maximum (kg) | 32.14 ± 7.96 | 36.88 ± 8.04 | <0.001 (−6.89, −2.59) | 35.73 ± 8.95 | 32.13 ± 8.58 | 0.050 (0.01, 7.19) |
| Chair stand (time) | 22.13 ± 4.35 | 27.63 ± 5.03 | <0.001 (−7.29, −3.71) | 16.06 ± 4.78 | 17.25 ± 3.45 | 0.299 (−3.54, 1.17) |
| 60-s sit-up (time) | 22.00 ± 5.61 | 26.50 ± 6.31 | 0.002 (−7.01, −1.99) | 17.94 ± 7.72 | 18.88 ± 7.67 | 0.472 (−3.64, 1.77) |
Significant within-group difference. Values are means ± SD. CI: Confidence intervals.
Fig. 6Correlations between the changes in ERP P3 amplitudes and trunk fat percentage in the EG group.