Literature DB >> 14696728

Developmental differences in behavioral and event-related brain responses associated with response preparation and inhibition in a go/nogo task.

L M Jonkman1, M Lansbergen, J E A Stauder.   

Abstract

The present study investigated developmental trends in response inhibition and preparation by studying behavior and event-related brain activity in a cued go/nogo task, administered to nine-year-old children and young adults. Hits, false alarms, inattention, and impulsivity scores and ERP measures of inhibition (fronto-central nogo-N2 and P3), target selection (parietal go-nogo P3 difference), and response preparation (contingent negative variation; CNV) were collected. Higher false alarm and impulsivity scores and the absence of the fronto-central nogo P3 all suggest a developmental lag in response inhibition in children. A developmental lag in sustained attention processes was suggested by worse target detection and larger parietal target/nontarget P3 effects in children. Cue orientation and response preparation processes were respectively measured by early and late CNV activity. Children displayed smaller early CNV amplitudes at fronto-central locations, but mature late CNV. The smaller early CNV activity might indicate inefficient cue-orientation processes caused by incomplete frontal lobe development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14696728     DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  52 in total

Review 1.  A developmental perspective on executive function.

Authors:  John R Best; Patricia H Miller
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

2.  Towards a unified model of event-related potentials as phases of stimulus-to-response processing.

Authors:  Brittany K Taylor; William J Gavin; Kevin J Grimm; Mark A Prince; Mei-Heng Lin; Patricia L Davies
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The effects of an afterschool physical activity program on working memory in preadolescent children.

Authors:  Keita Kamijo; Matthew B Pontifex; Kevin C O'Leary; Mark R Scudder; Chien-Ting Wu; Darla M Castelli; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-04-25

4.  Cognitive control moderates early childhood temperament in predicting social behavior in 7-year-old children: an ERP study.

Authors:  Connie Lamm; Olga L Walker; Kathryn A Degnan; Heather A Henderson; Daniel S Pine; Jennifer Martin McDermott; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-04-22

5.  Effects of response preparation on developmental improvements in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Sarah Ordaz; Stephanie Davis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

6.  Error-monitoring brain activity is associated with affective behaviors in young children.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brooker; Kristin A Buss; Tracy A Dennis
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Event-related potential differences in children supplemented with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids during infancy.

Authors:  Ke Liao; Bruce D McCandliss; Susan E Carlson; John Colombo; D Jill Shaddy; Elizabeth H Kerling; Rebecca J Lepping; Wichian Sittiprapaporn; Carol L Cheatham; Kathleen M Gustafson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2016-10-16

8.  How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: an Event Related Potentials study.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Joshua White; Matthew R Brier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Priming Facial Gender and Emotional Valence: The Influence of Spatial Frequency on Face Perception in ASD.

Authors:  Steven Vanmarcke; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-04

10.  Behavioral and Electrophysiological Differences in Executive Control Between Monolingual and Bilingual Children.

Authors:  Raluca Barac; Sylvain Moreno; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.