| Literature DB >> 35892013 |
Maria Helena Vaisbich1, Luís Gustavo Modelli de Andrade2, Precil Diego Miranda de Menezes Neves3, Lílian Monteiro Pereira Palma4, Maria Cristina Ribeiro de Castro5, Cassiano Augusto Braga Silva6, Maria Izabel Neves de Holanda Barbosa7, Maria Goretti Moreira Guimarães Penido8, Oreste Ângelo Ferra Neto9, Roberta Mendes Lima Sobral10, Silvana Maria Carvalho Miranda11, Stanley de Almeida Araújo12, Igor Gouveia Pietrobom13, Henrique Mochida Takase14, Cláudia Ribeiro11, Rafael Marques da Silva15, César Augusto Almeida de Carvalho16, David José Barros Machado5, Ana Mateus Simões Teixeira E Silva17, Andreia Ribeiro da Silva18, Enzo Ricardo Russo19, Flávio Henrique Soares Barros20, Jarinne Camilo Landim Nasserala21, Luciana Schmitt Cardon de Oliveira22, Lucimary de Castro Sylvestre23, Rafael Weissheimer24, Sueli Oliveira Nascimento25, Gilson Bianchini26, Fellype de Carvalho Barreto26, Valéria Soares Pigozzi Veloso17, Patrícia Marques Fortes27, Vinicius Sardão Colares28, Jaelson Guilhem Gomes29, André Falcão Pedrosa Leite30, Pablo Girardelli Mendonça Mesquita31, Osvaldo Merege Vieira-Neto32.
Abstract
Background: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an ultra-rare disease. Therefore, studies involving large samples are scarce, making registries powerful tools to evaluate cases. We present herein the first analysis of the Brazilian aHUS Registry (BRaHUS).Entities:
Keywords: Brazil; atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome; eculizumab; genetic; rare diseases
Year: 2022 PMID: 35892013 PMCID: PMC9308094 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Kidney J ISSN: 2048-8505
Baseline characteristics on Brazilian aHUS Registry patients divided by age: <2 years old, between 2 and 18 years old and >18 years old
| <2 years old ( | 2–18 years old ( | >18 years old ( | Total ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female ( | 3 (17.6%) | 13 (72.2%) | 26 (65%) | 42 (56%) | .001 |
| Age (years) | 0.81 (0.7–1.2) | 8.84 (6.5–14.8) | 29.7 (25.95–34.5) | 20.7 (2.4–30.3) | <.001 |
| Family history ( | 1 (6.2%) | 1 (5.6%) | 4 (10%) | 6 (8.1%) | .809 |
| Previous hypertension ( | 3 (30%) | 7 (50%) | 31 (93.7%) | 41 (71.9%) | <.001 |
| Kidney transplant ( | 1 (5.8%) | 3 (16.6%) | 18 (45%) | 22 (29%) | <.001 |
| Clinical presentation ( | |||||
| Hypertension | 14 (87.5%) | 11 (64.7%) | 31 (77.5%) | 56 (76.7%) | .516 |
| Diarrhea | 3 (17.6%) | 2 (11.8%) | 5 (12.5%) | 10 (19.6%) | .831 |
| Dyspnea | 3 (30%) | 1 (12.5%) | 8 (32%) | 12 (27.9%) | .556 |
| Fatigue | 3 (27.3%) | 8 (72.7%) | 30 (85.7%) | 41 (71.9%) | <.001 |
| Elevated creatinine | 16 (94.1%) | 16 (94.1%) | 37 (94.9%) | 69 (94.5%) | .990 |
Continuous variables were expressed as median and percentiles 25 and 75.
Concomitant conditions on Brazilian aHUS Registry patients divided by age: <2 years old, between 2 and 18 years old and >18 years old
| <2 years old ( | 2–18 years old ( | >18 years old ( | Total ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalamin defect | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.0 |
| Malignant HTN | 1 (5.9%) | 1 (5.9%) | 3 (8.6%) | 5 (7.2%) | .911 |
| Pregnancy | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (13.5%) | 5 (7.0%) | .084 |
| SLE | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.8%) | 1 (1.4%) | .619 |
| Scleroderma | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.0 |
| APS | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.0 |
| Infection | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (33.3%) | 2 (12.5%) | 4 (10.8%) | .122 |
| Neoplasia | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1.0 |
| Medicationsa | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 15 (39.5%) | 15 (20.8%) | <.001 |
Abbreviations: APS, antiphospholipid syndrome; HTN, hypertension; SLE, systemic lupus erythematous. aTMA-inducing medications.
Baseline laboratory exams at diagnosis onset in Brazilian aHUS registry patients divided by age: <2 years old, between 2 and 18 years old and >18 years old
| <2 years old ( | 2–18 years old ( | >18 years old ( | Total ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 6.0 (5.3–6.9) | 6.5 (6.0–7.4) | 7.7 (6.2–9.4) | 7.0 (6.0–8.6) | .012 |
| Coombs Test positive | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Platelets (×103/mm3) | 53 (34–55) | 55 (35.7–88.7) | 89.5 (53–126.7) | 65 (40–107) | .003 |
| LDH (U/dl) | 1855 (1484–3408) | 2097 (1186–2625) | 1000 (677–1567) | 1400 (850–2344) | .004 |
| Schistocyte | 14 (100.0%) | 13 (86.7%) | 25 (71.4%) | 52 (81.2%) | .150 |
| Not performed | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 6 (17.1%) | 8 (12.5%) | |
| Haptoglobin (mg/dL) | 12.5 (10–26) | 12 (6–16) | 20 (6–37) | 13 (7–30) | .388 |
| Proteinuria | .493 | ||||
| Absent | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | 3 (11.1%) | 5 (9.1%) | |
| nephrotic | 5 (38.5%) | 2 (13.3%) | 6 (22.2%) | 13 (23.6%) | |
| Not nephrotic | 6 (46.2%) | 11 (73.3%) | 15 (55.6%) | 32 (58.2%) | |
| albuminuria | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (1.8%) | |
| Not performed | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (11.1%) | 4 (7.3%) | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.9 (1.5–2.1) | 4.8 (2.8–9.4) | 4.6 (2.7–7.6) | 3.9 (1.9–7) | .003 |
| eGFR (mL/min) | 14.2 (7–15.6) | 14.6 (9.4–37) | 12.6 (7.7–26) | 14.2 (8.1–23.3) | .715 |
| ADAMTS-13 activity (%) | 93 (40–100) | 87 (85–100) | 79 (70–98) | 85 (68–100) | .424 |
| Shiga Toxin PCR | .007 | ||||
| Negative | 5 (33.3%) | 5 (33.3%) | 2 (5.4%) | 12 (17.9%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Not performed | 10 (66.7%) | 10 (66.7%) | 35 (94.6%) | 55 (82.1%) | |
| Stool culture | .199 | ||||
| Negative | 5 (38.5%) | 7 (43.8%) | 7 (20.6%) | 19 (30.2%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Not performed | 8 (61.5%) | 9 (56.2%) | 27 (79.4%) | 44 (69.8%) | |
| Antinuclear factor test | .016 | ||||
| Negative | 10 (71.4%) | 16 (100.0%) | 28 (75.7%) | 54 (80.6%) | |
| Positive | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (16.2%) | 6 (9.0%) | |
| Not performed | 4 (28.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (8.1%) | 7 (10.4%) | |
| Complement C3 serum | .927 | ||||
| Normal | 8 (72.7%) | 9 (69.2%) | 21 (75.0%) | 38 (73.1%) | |
| Complement C4 serum | .314 | ||||
| Normal | 9 (81.8%) | 13 (92.9%) | 26 (96.3%) | 48 (92.3%) | |
| Kidney biopsy | 6 (42.9%) | 10 (58.8%) | 28 (80.0%) | 44 (58.6%) | .033 |
Continuous variables were expressed as median and percentiles 25 and 75. LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Clinical evolution of Brazilian aHUS Registry patients divided by age: <2 years old, between 2 and 18 years old and >18 years old
| <2 years old ( | 2–18 years old ( | >18 years old ( | Total ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renal injury within 3 months ( | |||||
| No kidney damage | 2 (14.4%) | 1 (7.7%) | 4 (16%) | 7 (13.5%) | .334 |
| Chronic kidney disease stage 1 | 1 (7.1%) | 2 (23.1%) | 1 (4%) | 5 (9.6%) | |
| Chronic kidney disease stage 2 | 1 (7.1%) | 2 (15.4%) | 2 (8%) | 5 (9.6%) | |
| Chronic kidney disease stage 3 | 2 (14.3%) | 1 (7.7%) | 6 (24%) | 9 (17.3%) | |
| Chronic kidney disease stage 4 | 2 (14.3%) | 0 | 0 | 2 (3.8%) | |
| Chronic kidney disease stage 5 | 6 (42.9%) | 6 (46.2%) | 12 (48%) | 24 (46.2%) | |
| Dialysis need | 8 (47%) | 9 (50%) | 17 (42.5%) | 34 (45%) | .956 |
| Treatment within 3 months ( | |||||
| Red blood cells transfusion | 15 (93.8%) | 14 (82.4%) | 22 (59.5%) | 51 (72.9%) | .095 |
| Platelet transfusion | 10 (66.7%) | 4 (23.5%) | 8 (21.1%) | 22 (31.4%) | .019 |
| Plasma transfusion | 6 (42.9%) | 7 (43.8%) | 12 (32.4%) | 25 (37.3%) | .891 |
| Plasma exchange | 0 | 3 (20%) | 16 (42.1%) | 19 (27.5%) | .005 |
| Treatment ≥3 months ( | |||||
| Eculizumab use | 16 (94.1%) | 16 (94.1%) | 39 (100%) | 71 (97.3%) | .307 |
| Time eculizumab infusion (days) | 15 (14–25) | 30 (14–44) | 45 (6–260) | 25 (7–118) | .600 |
Genetic variants in aHUS Brazilian Registry divided by age ≤18 years old and >18 years old
| ≤18 years ( | >18 years ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic test performed | 14 (40%) | 19 (47.5%) | 33 (44%) |
| Patients where genetic test were performed | |||
| Negative genetics ( | 6/43 | 5/26 | 11/33,5 |
|
| 2/14 | 5/26 | 7/21 |
|
| 2/14 | 5/26 | 7/21 |
| Other | 3/21 | 3/16 | 6/18 |
|
| 1 (VUS)/7 | 3/16 | 4/12 |
|
| 0/0 | 3/16 | 3/9 |
|
| 0/0 | 1/5 | 1/3 |
|
| 0/0 | 1/5 | 1/3 |
| Not specified ( | 1/7 | 1/5 | 0/0 |
CFHR, CFH-Related protein; VUS, variant of unknown significance.
Detailed genetic variants in aHUS Brazilian Registry
| Variant | Number of cases | Female/male | Age at diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5 | 3/2 | 4 mo; 1y; 23y; 29y; 32y |
| del | 5 | 4/1 | 1.5y; 2.2y; 8y; 20y; 29y |
|
| 1 | 1/0 | 28y |
|
| 2 | 1/1 | 29y; 32y |
|
| 1 | 1/0 | 31y |
|
| 1 | 0/1 | 20y |
|
| 2 | 1/1 | 17y; 44y |
|
| 2 | 2/0 | 3 mo; 17y |
|
| 1 | 0/1 | 20y |
|
| 1 | 1/0 | 16y |
|
| 1 | 0/1 | 34y |
|
| 1 | 1/0 | 22y |
|
| 1 | 0/1 | 38y |
| Heterozygous variant in | 1 | 0/1 | 49y |
|
| 1 | 0/1 | 26y |
y, years; mo, months of age; VUS, variant of unknown significance.
FIGURE 1:Density distribution of the time between aHUS diagnosis and eculizumab infusion in days. Patients are divided in two groups by dialysis need: the blue color refers to dialysis independent and red color to dialysis dependent.