| Literature DB >> 35891361 |
Julio Retamales1, Pablo Núñez2, Romina Alvarado2, Erick D M Campan3, Thierry Otto3, Cristopher Segovia4, Ignacio Vasquez4, Javier Santander4.
Abstract
Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis (hereafter X. juglandis) is the etiological agent of walnut blight, the most important bacterial disease affecting walnut production worldwide. Currently, the disease is treated mainly with copper-derived compounds (e.g., CuSO4) despite the evidence of genetic resistance in these strains. Regarding the effectiveness and sustainability, the use of a bacteriophage appears to be a biocontrol alternative to reduce X. juglandis load and symptomatology of walnut blight. Here, the phages f20-Xaj, f29-Xaj, and f30-Xaj were characterized, and their effectiveness in walnut orchards against walnut blight was determined. These bacteriophages showed a specific lytic infection in X. juglandis strains isolated from Chile and France. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome of f20-Xaj and f30-Xaj indicates that these phages belong to the Pradovirus genus. In the field, the cocktail of these bacteriophages showed similar effectivity to CuSO4 in the reduction of incidence and severity in walnut tissue. Moreover, the bacterial load of X. juglandis was significantly reduced in the presence of bacteriophages in contrast to a CuSO4 treatment. These results show that the use of bacteriophages can be an alternative to combat the symptoms of walnut blight caused by X. juglandis.Entities:
Keywords: Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis; phage therapy; walnut blight
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35891361 PMCID: PMC9325289 DOI: 10.3390/v14071380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.818
Bacteriophage specificity to different bacteria isolated from walnut trees. The bacterial identification was generated by sequencing the 16S rRNA portion or specific genes.
| Bacterial Strains | Biological and Geographical Origin | Year Isolation | Bacteriophages | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2011 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2014 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2014 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2015 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2015 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, VIII Region-Chile | 2015 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, RM-Chile | 2016 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, RM-Chile | 2016 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, RM-Chile | 2016 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, RM-Chile | 2016 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, Toulouse-Francia | 2018 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, Toulouse-Francia | 2018 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, Toulouse-Francia | 2018 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, Toulouse-Francia | 2018 | + | + | + | |
| Walnut, Toulouse-Francia | 2018 | + | + | + | |
| Hazelnut, VII Region-Chile | 2016 | − | (+) | + | |
| Hazelnut, VII Region-Chile | 2016 | − | (+) | + | |
| Hazelnut, VII Region-Chile | 2016 | − | − | + | |
| Hazelnut, VII Region-Chile | 2016 | − | − | + | |
|
| Hazelnut, VII Region-Chile | 2015 | − | − | − |
|
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2014 | − | − | − |
|
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2015 | − | − | − |
|
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2015 | − | − | − |
|
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2015 | − | − | − |
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2015 | − | − | − | |
|
| Walnut, VIII Region- Chile | 2015 | − | − | − |
|
| Plum, RM-Chile | 2017 | − | − | − |
(−) No plaque; + clear plaque formation; (+) turbid plaque formation; 1 strain donated by Servicio Agricola y Ganadero (SAG-Chile).
Figure 1Morphological characterization of phages and in vitro lytic against X. juglandis J303. (A–C): MET, (D–F) Lysis plaque, (G) Delay curve. Arrow indicates the time of addition of individual bacteriophage. All experiments were employed in three independent replicates.
Figure 2One-step growth curve for bacteriophages f20-Xaj, f29-Xaj, and f30-Xaj propagated in X. juglandis J303. The figure shows means ± standard error from three independent experiments.
Titer stability of phages under different liquid suspensions and temperatures 28 days post-incubation. This table gathers the results obtained from the three bacteriophages evaluated independently.
| Temperature (°C) | Distilled Water | Tap Water | YPG Broth | YPG Broth + Algae Extract | YPG Broth + Cuprous Oxide | YPG Broth + Copper Hydroxide | YPG Broth + Copper Sulfate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −20 | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | ++ |
| 4 | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | − | − | + |
| 17 | + | +++ | +++ | +++ | − | − | − |
| 28 | − | +++ | +++ | +++ | − | − | − |
(+++) Maintains titer of phage to 1 × 105 PFU/mL; (++) decrease of 1 log unit PFU/mL; (+) decrease of 2 log unit PFU/mL; (−) decrease of more than 3 log unit PFU/mL.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of Pradovirus genus of bacteriophages made with whole-genome-based methodology through MEGAX software [39] and compared with other bacterial phytopathogen phages. The evolutionary history of f20-Xaj and f30-Xaj was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [42].
Figure 4Map of genome organization of f20-Xaj (A) and f30-Xaj (B) bacteriophages using the BRIG platform and the CGView program. The ORFs are shown in blue arrows. The GC content is indicated by the black ring.
Figure 5Schematic genomic alignment of f20-Xaj and f30-Xaj phage generated using the EasyFig program. Arrows with different colors represent ORFs according to their predicted functions indicated at the bottom. The grey bar in the lower right corner shows the identity percentage associated with the color of the bars connecting homologous regions.
Figure 6Genomic comparison at the nucleotide level of f20-Xaj and f30-Xaj genome to the other representative phages from the closest genus Pradovirus. (A) Whole-genome pairwise comparison of the eight phages’ complete nucleotide sequences, visualized as a matrix with percent identity with CLC Main Workbench 7. (B) ANI analysis table of eight Pradovirus phages selected. The color gradient from blue to red shows the percentage of identity, from lowest to highest, that each pair of phage genomes shares.
Evaluation of incidence and severity in fruit and leaves of walnut trees treated with bacteriophages mix.
| Leave | Fruit | Performance (Kg) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence (%) | Severity (Grade) | Incidence (%) | Severity (Grade) | Incidence (%) | Severity (Grade) | Incidence (%) | Severity (Grade) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| 66.3 b | 3 b | 38.75 c | 3 b | 58.13 | 4 c | 37.5 b | 4 c | 10.25 a | |
|
| 25.6 a | 2 a | 8.75 bc | 2 a | 12.5 | 2 a | 22.5 a | 2 a | 25 c | |
|
| 2 cc/L | 41.88 c | 2a | 33.13 abc | 2 a | 46.25 | 3 b | 30 ab | 3 b | 12.75 a |
| 3 cc/L | 39.38 bc | 2a | 28.75 ab | 2 a | 40 | 3 b | 29.38 ab | 3 b | 17.0 b | |
| 4 cc/L | 30.0 ab | 2 a | 11.88 a | 2 a | 22.5 | 2 a | 28.13 a | 2.75 b | 19.75 b | |
UTC: Untreated control, CuT: Conventional treatment based on commercial copper compounds. Averages in the same column with the same letter do not differ statistically (p < 0.05). The dates cited in the table indicate the times of sampling from the treated trees.
Figure 7Reduction of bacterial load and walnut blight symptomatology in fruits obtained from treated fields. (A) Bacterial load (CFU/g) on walnut fruit post-treatments. UTC: Untreated control, CuT: Conventional treatment based on commercial copper compounds. Error bars represent standard deviation of three groups of tree walnut fruit from each treatment. Highly significant (****) different from the UTC (p < 0.0001); Significantly (***) different between groups. (p < 0.001). Representative images of immature walnut fruit post-treatment: (B) UTC, (C) CuT, and (D) phage cocktail (4 cc/L).