| Literature DB >> 35890853 |
Ghada El Fidha1,2, Nabila Bitri2, Sarra Mahjoubi2, Fatma Chaabouni2, Eduard Llobet3, Juan Casanova-Chafer3.
Abstract
Pure and dysprosium-loaded ZnO films were grown by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. The films were characterized using a wide variety of morphological, compositional, optical, and electrical techniques. The crystalline structure, surface homogeneity, and bandgap energies were studied in detail for the developed nanocomposites. The properties of pure and dysprosium-doped ZnO thin films were investigated to detect nitrogen dioxide (NO2) at the ppb range. In particular, ZnO sensors doped with rare-earth materials have been demonstrated as a feasible strategy to improve the sensitivity in comparison to their pure ZnO counterparts. In addition, the sensing performance was studied and discussed under dry and humid environments, revealing noteworthy stability and reliability under different experimental conditions. In this perspective, additional gaseous compounds such as ammonia and ethanol were measured, resulting in extremely low sensing responses. Therefore, the gas-sensing mechanisms were discussed in detail to better understand the NO2 selectivity given by the Dy-doped ZnO layer.Entities:
Keywords: Dy-doped ZnO; NO2; gas sensor; humidity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890853 PMCID: PMC9317177 DOI: 10.3390/s22145173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Structure of the gas sensing device.
Figure 2FESEM images of pure ZnO (a), and Dy@ZnO sample (b).
The weight percentage of elements in pure and Dy-doped ZnO thin films.
| Weight Percentage (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Zn | O | Dy |
| ZnO | 61.35 | 38.65 | 0 |
| Dy@ZnO | 59.11 | 35.28 | 5.61 |
Figure 3X-ray diffraction pattern of undoped ZnO thin film (a) and Dy-doped ZnO (b).
Structural parameters of pure and Dy-doped ZnO thin films.
| Sample | Pure ZnO | Dy@ZnO |
|---|---|---|
| 2θ (degree) | 34.5 | 33.8 |
|
| 0.27 | 0.34 |
| D (nm) | 30.8 | 24.1 |
Figure 4Optical transmittance and reflectance spectra for the Dy-doped ZnO thin films (a). The plot of (αhν)2 versus (hν) of undoped and Dy-doped ZnO thin films (b).
Figure 5Complex impedance spectra at different temperatures for the pure (a) and Dy-doped ZnO (b) thin films. Angular frequency dependence of Z” at different temperatures for the pure (c) and Dy-doped ZnO (d) thin films.
Figure 6Angular frequency dependence of conductivity at different temperatures for the pure (a) and Dy-doped (b) ZnO thin films.
The activation energy of the pure and Dy-doped ZnO layers.
|
|
|
|
| ZnO | 1.15 | 1.25 |
| Dy@ZnO | 0.34 | 0.45 |
Figure 7Sensor resistance when detecting NO2 at 150 °C with pure (a) and Dy-doped ZnO (b) in dry conditions. The experiments were repeated under a humid atmosphere for pure (c) and Dy-doped ZnO (d) thin films.
Figure 8The response of the sensors as a function of concentration NO2 in dry conditions (a) and humid conditions (b). The sensor responses were defined as ∆R/Ra expressed in percentage.
Figure 9Comparison between pure and Dy-doped ZnO for different target gases in dry conditions.