| Literature DB >> 35481018 |
G El Fidha1,2, N Bitri2, F Chaabouni2, S Acosta3, F Güell4, C Bittencourt3, J Casanova-Chafer5, E Llobet5.
Abstract
Dysprosium-doped zinc oxide (ZnO) thin films have been prepared through spray pyrolysis onto glass substrates. Cross-sections of the deposited thin films were assessed through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), showing thicknesses between 200 and 300 nm. The thin film roughness was evaluated using the obtained images from the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) micrographs. The crystallographic structure of the samples was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) revealing polycrystalline thin films. However, the slight shift towards a higher 2θ angle in Dy-doped ZnO films as compared to the pure ones indicates the incorporation of Dy3+ into the ZnO crystal lattice. The analysis of the oxidation state via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirms the incorporation of Dy ions in the ZnO matrix. Besides, UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometry analysis and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy showed that bandgap energy values of ZnO decreased when dysprosium doping increased. Therefore, Dy doped ZnO thin films can be potentially used as a solar-light-driven photocatalyst. Among the different doping yields, the ZnO doped with 6% dysprosium provides the highest degradation rate for methylene blue (MB) under solar irradiation. Specifically, 9% of dye degradation was achieved under sunlight irradiation for 120 minutes. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35481018 PMCID: PMC9036874 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra03967a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Scheme of spray pyrolysis method employed.
Fig. 22D (left side) and 3D (right side) AFM topography for (a) undoped ZnO, (b) ZnO:Dy 2%, (c) ZnO:Dy 4% and (d) ZnO:Dy 6% thin films.
Comparison of the thin film parameters for the different samples prepared (the quantification results express the Dy wt% obtained through EDX analysis.)
| Sample | Pure | Dy 2% | Dy 4% | Dy 6% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roughness (nm) | 21.66 | 32.38 | 31.68 | 73.08 |
| Thickness (nm) | 200 | 220 | 235 | 280 |
| [Dy/Zn] (%) | 0.0 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 6.2 |
|
| 3.22 | 3.07 | 3.13 | 2.93 |
|
| 509 | 556 | 680 | 734 |
Fig. 3Cross section of pure ZnO thin film imaged through ESEM.
Fig. 4(a) X-ray diffraction spectra of Dy doped ZnO thin films. (b) Shifting of the main diffraction angle with increasing doping concentrations.
Fig. 5The XPS spectra of (a) Zn 2p (b) Dy 4d.
Fig. 6(a) Optical transmittance and reflectance spectra for the Dy-doped ZnO thin films at various Dy contents. (b) Plot of (αhv)2versus (hv) of undoped and Dy-doped ZnO thin films. (c) Variation of Ln(α) with photon energy of undoped and Dy-doped ZnO thin films.
Fig. 7PL spectra for the Dy-doped ZnO thin films at various Dy contents.
Fig. 8Degradation rate of MB after solar irradiation for 2 hours using the Dy doped ZnO thin films at various Dy contents.
Fig. 9(a) The kinetic rate K as a function of Dy content. (b) Recyclability of Dy doped ZnO at 6%.