| Literature DB >> 35890776 |
Carlo Trigona1, Eliana Costa1,2, Giuseppe Politi2, Anna M Gueli2.
Abstract
The main objective of this work is the characterization and observation of the performance of an IoT measurement and monitoring system in the field of cultural heritage conservation for assessing the health condition of artworks. This article also describes the application of this system to the monitoring of a canvas painting applied on a wooden support, an artwork from the 19th century by the painter Giuseppe Patricolo depicting The Deposition, placed inside a niche in the Santa Caterina Monastery in Palermo (Italy). Considering the presence of the wooden structure, it is useful to measure not only microclimatic parameters such as temperature and humidity, but also vibrations that can in fact cause degradation phenomena in these artworks. This is a first step towards the development of mimetic systems integrated in the work of art without causing physical, mechanical or chemical alterations and ensuring that the level of microclimatic parameters is below the threshold values whose exceeding could compromise the entire artefact.Entities:
Keywords: IoT measurement system; cultural heritage preservation; microclimate monitoring; preventive conservation; structural health monitoring; vibrations
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890776 PMCID: PMC9323665 DOI: 10.3390/s22145097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Description of the approach underlying the research: microclimate monitoring is the base of preventive conservation. In this context the study aimed at understanding the artwork has a fundamental role. The data collected by the sensors of the microclimatic parameters and the information obtained with the diagnostic techniques allow the integrated fruition.
Temperature and relative humidity reference and deviation values for different categories of artifacts (from UNI10829:1999).
| Materials and Objects of Organic Nature | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity % | |||
| Range | Deviation | Range | Deviation | |
| Paper artifacts, papier-mâché, tissue paper, tapestries | 18–22 | 1.5 | 40–55 | 6 |
| Fabrics, velarium, carpets, tapestries, silk, costumes, clothing, religious vestments, natural fibers, sisal, jute * | 19–24 | 1.5 | 30–50 | 6 |
| Waxes, anatomical waxes | <18 | NR | NR | NR |
| Herbaria and collections | 21–23 | 1.5 | 45–55 | 2 |
| Entomological collections | 19–24 | 1.5 | 40–60 | 6 |
| Animals, dried anatomical organs, mummies | 21–23 | 1.5 | 20–35 | - |
| Furs, feathers, stuffed animals and birds | 4–10 | 1.5 | 30–50 | 5 |
| Drawings, watercolors, pastels, and similar works on paper | 19–24 | 1.5 | 45–60 | 2 |
| Ethnographic collections, masks, leather, and leather clothing | 19–24 | 1.5 | 45–60 | 6 |
| Paintings on canvas, oil paintings on canvas, tempera, gouaches | 19–24 | 1.5 | 40–55 | 6 |
| Archival documents on paper and parchments, papyri, manuscripts, printed volumes, philatelic collections | 13–18 | - | 50–60 | 5 |
| Leather or parchment bindings | 19–24 | 1.5 | 45–55 | 6 |
| Lacquers, decorated or lacquered furniture | 19–24 | 1.5 | 50–60 | 4 |
| Polychrome wood sculptures, painted wood, paintings in wood, wooden icons, wooden musical instruments | 19–24 | 1.5 | 50–60 | 4 |
| Unpainted wooden sculptures, wicker objects, wooden panels or bark | 19–24 | 1.5 | 45–60 | 4 |
|
| ||||
| Porcelain, ceramics, grès, terracotta, non-excavation tiles and excavated tiles if demineralized | NR | - | NR | 10 |
| Stones, rocks, minerals, stable (porous) meteorites | 19–24 | - | 40–60 | 6 |
| Stome mosaics, stones **, rocks, minerals, meteorites (non porous), fossils and stone collections | 15–25 | - | 20–60 | 10 |
| Metals, polished metals, metal alloys, silver, armour, weapons, bronze, coins, copper, tin, iron, steel, lead, pewter *** | NR | - | <50 | - |
| Metals with active corrosion sites | NR | - | <40 | - |
| Gold | NR | - | NR | - |
| Chalk | 21–23 | 1.5 | 45–55 | 2 |
| Unstable, iridescent, sensitive glass mosaics | 20–24 | 1.5 | 40–45 | - |
|
| ||||
| Wall paintings, frescoes, sinopites (detached) | 10–24 | - | 55–65 | - |
| Dry wall paintings (detached) | 10–24 | - | 50–45 | - |
| Ivories, horns, malacological, collection, eggs, nests, corals | 19–24 | 1.5 | 40–60 | 6 |
| Synthetic fibres | 19–24 | - | 40–60 | - |
| Film and photographs **** | 0–15 | - | 30–45 | - |
* lower HR values are preferable for materials under tension. ** very specific relative humidity values (sample-dependent). *** in the case of objects made of different metal parts welded together, temperature fluctuations can be harmful. **** in the absence of specific manufacturer’s instructions.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the IoT-based system for microclimate monitoring.
Characteristic of the sensors.
| Device | Description | Main Performance | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| STM32L4R9 | Microcontrollori ARM-MCU Ultra-low-power FPU Arm Cortex-M4 |
Operating voltage 1.71 V to 3.6 V MCU 120 MHz 2048 kbytes of Flash USB OTG, DFSD | 7 mm × 7 mm × 0.50 mm |
| STTS751 | Low-voltage local digital temperature sensor |
Operating voltage 2.25 V to 3.6 V Operating temperature −40 °C to +125 °C Low supply current 3 μA (typical) standby Accuracy ± 0.5 °C (typ) −40 °C to +125 °C | 2 mm × 2 mm × 0.5 mm |
| HTS221 | Capacitive Digital Humidity Sensor |
Operating voltage 1.7 to 3.6 V 0% to 100% relative humidity range Low power consumption: 2 μA @ 1 Hz High RH sensitivity: 0.004% RH/LSB Humidity accuracy: ±4.5% RH, 20% to +80% RH | 2 mm × 2 mm × 0.9 mm |
| LIS2DW12 | MEMS Digital Output Motion Sensor |
Ultra-low power consumption: 50 nA in power-down mode, below 1 µA in active low-power mode Very low noise: down to 1.3 mg RMS in low-power mode Supply voltage, 1.62 V to 3.6 V ±2 g/±4 g/±8 g/±16 g full scale 10000 g high-shock survivability | 2.0 mm × 2.0 mm × 0.7 mm |
Figure 3Board used for the monitoring of the painting.
Figure 4Prototype under test, copy of The Deposition.
Figure 5Experimental setup used in laboratory to characterize the IoT-based measurement system: (a) sensor inside climate chamber for relative humidity and temperature, (b) sensor on copy structure on the shaker.
Figure 6Characterization in terms of temperature at 50% of relative humidity.
Figure 7Characterization in terms of relative humidity at 20 °C.
Figure 8Characterization in terms of vibrations.
Figure 9Microclimate monitoring system installed in the real painting (a) and a zoom (b) where the measurement system is installed inside the inlet.
Figure 10Evolution of the temperature obtained during the measurements campaign.
Figure 11Evolution of the relative humidity obtained during the measurement campaign.
Figure 12Evolution of the vibrations obtained during the measurement campaign.