| Literature DB >> 35890504 |
Ahmed H El-Ghorab1, Fathy A Behery2,3, Mohamed A Abdelgawad4, Ibrahim Hotan Alsohaimi1, Arafa Musa5, Ehab M Mostafa5, Hamud A Altaleb6, Ibrahim O Althobaiti7, Mohamed Hamza8, Mohammed H Elkomy9, Ahmed A Hamed10, Ahmed M Sayed11, Hossam M Hassan12, Mahmoud A Aboseada11.
Abstract
Origanum majoranum L. is a Lamiaceae medicinal plant with culinary and ethnomedical applications. Its biological and phytochemical profiles have been extensively researched. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the chemical composition and the antibacterial and antioxidant properties of O. majoranum high features, as well as to search for techniques for activity optimization. A metabolomics study of the crude extract of O. majoranum using liquid chromatography-high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC ± HR ± ESI ± MS) was conducted. Five fractions (petroleum ether, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and aqueous) were derived from the total extract of the aerial parts. Different chromatographic methods and NMR analysis were utilized to purify and identify the isolated phenolics (high features). Moreover, the antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and antioxidant activity of phenolics were performed. Results showed that metabolomic profiling of the crude extract of O. majoranum aerial parts revealed the presence of a variety of phytochemicals, predominantly phenolics, resulting in the isolation and identification of seven high-feature compounds comprising two phenolic acids, rosmarinic and caffeic acids, one phenolic diterpene, 7-methoxyepirosmanol, in addition to four flavonoids, quercetin, hesperitin, hesperidin, and luteolin. On the other hand, 7-methoxyepirosmanol (OM1) displayed the most antimicrobial and antioxidant potential. Such a phenolic principal activity improvement seems to be established after loading on gold nanoparticles.Entities:
Keywords: 7-methoxyepirosmanol; Origanum majoranum L.; antimicrobial; antioxidant potential; gold nanoparticles; high features; metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890504 PMCID: PMC9319600 DOI: 10.3390/plants11141871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
LC-HRESIMS analysis of OM extract.
| Experimentally Accurate | Theoretically Accurate | Quasi-Form | Suggested Formula a | Tentative Identification b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 302.0791 | 302.0790 | [M+H]+ | C16H14O6 | Hesperitin |
| 347.0762 | 347.0760 | [M+H]+ | C17H14O8 | Rosmarinic acid |
| 272.0893 | 272.0896 | [M+H]+ | C12H16O7 | Arbutin |
| 457.3670 | 457.3673 | [M+H]+ | C30H48O3 | Oleanolic acid |
| 456.3605 | 456.3603 | [M+H]+ | C30H48O3 | Ursolic acid |
| 170.0217 | 170.0215 | [M+H]+ | C7H6O5 | Gallic acid |
| 181.0495 | 181.0497 | [M+H]+ | C9H8O4 | Caffeic acid |
| 164.0471 | 164.0473 | [M+H]+ | C9H8O3 | |
| 194.0578 | 194.0579 | [M+H]+ | C10H10O4 | Ferulic acid |
| 270.0529 | 270.0528 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O5 | Apigenin |
| 164.0812 | 164.0815 | [M+H]+ | C10H12O2 | Trans-2-Hydrocinnamic acid |
| 392.1108 | 392.1107 | [M+H]+ | C19H20O9 | 6- |
| 290.0792 | 290.0790 | [M+H]+ | C15H14O6 | Catechin |
| 611.1606 | 611.1609 | [M+H]+ | C27H30O16 | Rutin |
| 302.0427 | 302.0426 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O7 | Quercetin |
| 539.0974 | 539.0975 | [M+H]+ | C30H18O10 | Amentoflavone |
| 449.1079 | 449.1077 | [M+H]+ | C21H20O11 | Luteolin 7- |
| 360.1905 | 360.1907 | [M+H]+ | C21H28O5 | 7-Methoxyepirosmanol |
| 611.1973 | 611.1972 | [M+H]+ | C28H34O15 | Hesperidin |
| 286.0476 | 286.0477 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O6 | Luteolin |
a High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) using XCalibur 3.0 and allowing for M+H/M+Na adduct. b The suggested compound according to the Dictionary of Natural Products (DNP 23.1, 2021 on DVD) and Reaxys online database.
High features of compounds (ranked by peak intensity) detected in hydromethanolic extracts of OM after dereplication of their metabolomes.
| No. | Accurate | Suggested Formula a | Quasi-Form | Tentative Detection b | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 302.0790 | [M+H]+ | C16H14O6 | Hesperitin | 2.2 × 104 |
| 2 | 347.0760 | [M+H]+ | C17H14O8 | Rosmarinic acid | 1.2 × 107 |
| 3 | 181.0497 | [M+H]+ | C9H8O4 | Caffeic acid | 4.4 × 107 |
| 4 | 270.0528 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O5 | Apigenin | 2.3 × 107 |
| 5 | 302.0426 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O7 | Quercetin | 8.8 × 105 |
| 6 | 360.1907 | [M+H]+ | C21H28O5 | 7-Methoxyepirosmanol | 3.6 × 106 |
| 7 | 611.1972 | [M+H]+ | C28H34O15 | Hesperidin | 1.1 × 104 |
| 8 | 286.0477 | [M+H]+ | C15H10O6 | Luteolin | 6.8 × 106 |
a High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) using XCalibur 3.0 and allowing for M+H/M+Na adduct. b The suggested compound according to the Dictionary of Natural Products (DNP 23.1, 2021 on DVD) and Reaxys online database.
Figure 1Structures of high features of compounds (ranked by peak intensity) detected in hydromethanolic extract of OM after dereplication of their metabolomes.
Figure 2In vitro antimicrobial activity. (A) Antibacterial activity of different purified compounds, compared to control (ciprofloxacin). (B) Antibacterial and antifungal activity of compound OM1, compared with AuNPs and AuNPs-OM1.
Biofilm inhibitory percentage (%) of OM1 and AgNPs-OM1.
| Biofilm Inhibitory Percentage (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Bacteria |
|
|
|
|
| Compound OM1 | 5.245 | 7.025 | 0 | 10.552 |
| AuNPs-OM1 | 19.251 | 15.551 | 0 | 30.021 |
Scavenging activity (%) of the purified compounds and AuNPs-OM1.
| Sample (100 µL) (Concentration = 4 µg) | Scavenging Activity (%) |
|---|---|
| OM1 | 91.59 |
| OM2 | 89.38 |
| OM3 | 76.078 |
| OM4 | 68.88 |
| OM5 | 58.58 |
| OM6 | 68.83 |
| OM7 | 65.63 |
| AuNPs-OM1 | 55.50 |
| Ascorbic acid | 99.86 |
Scavenging activity (%) of the compound OM1 at different concentrations.
| OM1 | O.D517nm | Scavenging Activity (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.759 | |
| 50 µL (1 µg) | 2.4145 | 12.48 |
| 100 µL (2 µg) | 1.83 | 33.67 |
| 200 µL (4 µg) | 0.7114 | 74.22 |
| 300 µL (6 µg) | 0.2936 | 89.35 |
| IC50 = 2.41 µg |
Figure 3Surface plasmon bands of the compound OM1 (a), AuNPs (b), and the AuNPs-OM1 conjugate (c). Color change of the gold alone (d) and extract (e), when mixed together (f) and the formation of AuNPs-OM1 (g). Surface plasmon absorption bands (SPR).
Figure 4TEM and SEM micrographs of the prepared AuNPs (a,c) and AuNPs-OM1 (b,d).
Figure 5The XRD of the prepared AuNPs.
Figure 6FTIR spectra for compound OM1 (a) and the prepared AuNPs-OM1 (b).